Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Radioactive Seed Localization Versus Wire Localization for Nonpalpable Breast Lesions: A Two-Year Initial Experience at a Large Community Hospital.
Ann Surg Oncol 2018; 25(1):131-136AS

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Radioactive seed localization (RSL) is a safe and effective alternative to wire localization (WL) for nonpalpable breast lesions. While several large academic institutions currently utilize RSL, few community hospitals have adopted this technique.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to examine the experience of RSL versus WL at a large community hospital.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of patients who underwent RSL or WL for breast-conserving surgery from 1 November 2013 to 31 November 2015.

RESULTS

The total number of lesions examined was 382. RSL was utilized in 205 (54%) lesions, with 187 undergoing single RSL, while WL was used in 155 (40%) lesions, with 109 undergoing single WL; both techniques were used in 22 (6%) lesions. Pathology was benign in 142 (48%) lesions, with 93 RSLs and 49 WLs. For malignant lesions, mean specimen size was 36.3 g for single RSL and 35.9 g for single WL (p = 0.904). Re-excision for margin clearance was required for 16 (17%) malignant lesions in the RSL group and 10 (17%) in the WL group (p = 0.954). For malignant lesions, mean operating room time was 86 min for single RSL versus 70 min for single WL (p = 0.014).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of RSL is a viable option in the community setting, with several benefits over WL. While operative times were slightly longer with RSL, there was no difference in specimen size or re-excision rate for malignant lesions.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Carle Foundation Hospital, Urbana, IL, USA.University of Illinois - Urbana/Champaign, Champaign, IL, USA.University of Illinois - Urbana/Champaign, Champaign, IL, USA.University of Illinois - Urbana/Champaign, Champaign, IL, USA.University of Illinois - Urbana/Champaign, Champaign, IL, USA.Carle Foundation Hospital, Urbana, IL, USA.Carle Foundation Hospital, Urbana, IL, USA. anna.higham@carle.com.

Pub Type(s)

Comparative Study
Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

29134380

Citation

Stelle, Lacey, et al. "Radioactive Seed Localization Versus Wire Localization for Nonpalpable Breast Lesions: a Two-Year Initial Experience at a Large Community Hospital." Annals of Surgical Oncology, vol. 25, no. 1, 2018, pp. 131-136.
Stelle L, Schoenheit T, Brubaker A, et al. Radioactive Seed Localization Versus Wire Localization for Nonpalpable Breast Lesions: A Two-Year Initial Experience at a Large Community Hospital. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25(1):131-136.
Stelle, L., Schoenheit, T., Brubaker, A., Tang, X., Qu, P., Cradock, K., & Higham, A. (2018). Radioactive Seed Localization Versus Wire Localization for Nonpalpable Breast Lesions: A Two-Year Initial Experience at a Large Community Hospital. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 25(1), pp. 131-136. doi:10.1245/s10434-017-6102-1.
Stelle L, et al. Radioactive Seed Localization Versus Wire Localization for Nonpalpable Breast Lesions: a Two-Year Initial Experience at a Large Community Hospital. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25(1):131-136. PubMed PMID: 29134380.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Radioactive Seed Localization Versus Wire Localization for Nonpalpable Breast Lesions: A Two-Year Initial Experience at a Large Community Hospital. AU - Stelle,Lacey, AU - Schoenheit,Taylor, AU - Brubaker,Allison, AU - Tang,Xiwei, AU - Qu,Peiyong, AU - Cradock,Kimberly, AU - Higham,Anna, Y1 - 2017/11/13/ PY - 2017/08/04/received PY - 2017/11/15/pubmed PY - 2019/3/5/medline PY - 2017/11/15/entrez SP - 131 EP - 136 JF - Annals of surgical oncology JO - Ann. Surg. Oncol. VL - 25 IS - 1 N2 - BACKGROUND: Radioactive seed localization (RSL) is a safe and effective alternative to wire localization (WL) for nonpalpable breast lesions. While several large academic institutions currently utilize RSL, few community hospitals have adopted this technique. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine the experience of RSL versus WL at a large community hospital. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of patients who underwent RSL or WL for breast-conserving surgery from 1 November 2013 to 31 November 2015. RESULTS: The total number of lesions examined was 382. RSL was utilized in 205 (54%) lesions, with 187 undergoing single RSL, while WL was used in 155 (40%) lesions, with 109 undergoing single WL; both techniques were used in 22 (6%) lesions. Pathology was benign in 142 (48%) lesions, with 93 RSLs and 49 WLs. For malignant lesions, mean specimen size was 36.3 g for single RSL and 35.9 g for single WL (p = 0.904). Re-excision for margin clearance was required for 16 (17%) malignant lesions in the RSL group and 10 (17%) in the WL group (p = 0.954). For malignant lesions, mean operating room time was 86 min for single RSL versus 70 min for single WL (p = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS: The use of RSL is a viable option in the community setting, with several benefits over WL. While operative times were slightly longer with RSL, there was no difference in specimen size or re-excision rate for malignant lesions. SN - 1534-4681 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/29134380/Radioactive_Seed_Localization_Versus_Wire_Localization_for_Nonpalpable_Breast_Lesions:_A_Two_Year_Initial_Experience_at_a_Large_Community_Hospital_ L2 - https://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-017-6102-1 DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -