Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

A randomized comparison between interscalene and combined infraclavicular-suprascapular blocks for arthroscopic shoulder surgery.
Can J Anaesth. 2018 03; 65(3):280-287.CJ

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This randomized trial aimed to evaluate combined infraclavicular-suprascapular blocks (ICB-SSBs) as a diaphragm-sparing alternative to interscalene blocks (ISBs) for arthroscopic shoulder surgery. We hypothesized that ICB-SSB would provide equivalent postoperative analgesia to ISB 30 min after surgery without the risk of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis.

METHODS

Following research ethics board approval and written informed consent, participants in the ISB group received an ultrasound-guided ISB with 20 mL of levobupivacaine 0.25% and epinephrine 5 µg·mL-1. In the ICB-SSB group, ultrasound-guided ICB (20 mL) and SSB (10 mL) were carried out using the same local anesthetic. Thirty minutes after the block was performed, a blinded investigator assessed the presence of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis. Subsequently, all patients underwent general anesthesia. Postoperatively, a blinded investigator recorded pain scores at rest at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 6, 12 and 24 hr. Consumption of intra- and postoperative narcotics was also tabulated.

RESULTS

Compared to its ICB-SSB counterpart, the ISB group displayed non-equivalent (i.e., lower) postoperative pain scores at 30 min (difference of the medians, -4; 99% confidence interval [CI], -6 to -3), required less cumulative morphine iv at 24 hr (difference of the means, -6.1 mg; 95% CI, -10.5 to -1.6), and resulted in a higher incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis (18/20 vs 0/20 patients, respectively; P < 0.001). Although postoperative pain scores at one, two, and three hours appeared lower in the ISB group, the upper bounds of the 99% CIs did not exceed the equivalence margin.

CONCLUSION

Compared with ICB-SSB, ISB provided non-equivalent (i.e., lower) postoperative pain scores 30 min after arthroscopic shoulder surgery. Thereafter, postoperative analgesia was comparable between the two groups. Further trials are required to compare ISB with ICB-SSB using a proximal (i.e., costoclavicular) technique for ICB.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

www.clinicaltrials.gov , NCT02993939. Registered 12 December 2016.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Department of Anesthesia, Hospital Clínico Universidad de Chile, University of Chile, Office B222 Second Floor, Sector B, 999 Santos Dumont, Independencia, 8380456, Santiago, Chile. aliste3006@gmail.com.Department of Anesthesia, Hospital Clínico Universidad de Chile, University of Chile, Office B222 Second Floor, Sector B, 999 Santos Dumont, Independencia, 8380456, Santiago, Chile.Department of Anesthesia, Montreal General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.Department of Anesthesia, Montreal General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.

Pub Type(s)

Comparative Study
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial

Language

eng

PubMed ID

29270914

Citation

Aliste, Julian, et al. "A Randomized Comparison Between Interscalene and Combined Infraclavicular-suprascapular Blocks for Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery." Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia = Journal Canadien D'anesthesie, vol. 65, no. 3, 2018, pp. 280-287.
Aliste J, Bravo D, Finlayson RJ, et al. A randomized comparison between interscalene and combined infraclavicular-suprascapular blocks for arthroscopic shoulder surgery. Can J Anaesth. 2018;65(3):280-287.
Aliste, J., Bravo, D., Finlayson, R. J., & Tran, D. Q. (2018). A randomized comparison between interscalene and combined infraclavicular-suprascapular blocks for arthroscopic shoulder surgery. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia = Journal Canadien D'anesthesie, 65(3), 280-287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-017-1048-0
Aliste J, et al. A Randomized Comparison Between Interscalene and Combined Infraclavicular-suprascapular Blocks for Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery. Can J Anaesth. 2018;65(3):280-287. PubMed PMID: 29270914.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - A randomized comparison between interscalene and combined infraclavicular-suprascapular blocks for arthroscopic shoulder surgery. AU - Aliste,Julian, AU - Bravo,Daniela, AU - Finlayson,Roderick J, AU - Tran,De Q, Y1 - 2017/12/19/ PY - 2017/05/31/received PY - 2017/08/19/accepted PY - 2017/08/17/revised PY - 2017/12/23/pubmed PY - 2019/8/1/medline PY - 2017/12/23/entrez SP - 280 EP - 287 JF - Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie JO - Can J Anaesth VL - 65 IS - 3 N2 - BACKGROUND: This randomized trial aimed to evaluate combined infraclavicular-suprascapular blocks (ICB-SSBs) as a diaphragm-sparing alternative to interscalene blocks (ISBs) for arthroscopic shoulder surgery. We hypothesized that ICB-SSB would provide equivalent postoperative analgesia to ISB 30 min after surgery without the risk of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis. METHODS: Following research ethics board approval and written informed consent, participants in the ISB group received an ultrasound-guided ISB with 20 mL of levobupivacaine 0.25% and epinephrine 5 µg·mL-1. In the ICB-SSB group, ultrasound-guided ICB (20 mL) and SSB (10 mL) were carried out using the same local anesthetic. Thirty minutes after the block was performed, a blinded investigator assessed the presence of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis. Subsequently, all patients underwent general anesthesia. Postoperatively, a blinded investigator recorded pain scores at rest at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 6, 12 and 24 hr. Consumption of intra- and postoperative narcotics was also tabulated. RESULTS: Compared to its ICB-SSB counterpart, the ISB group displayed non-equivalent (i.e., lower) postoperative pain scores at 30 min (difference of the medians, -4; 99% confidence interval [CI], -6 to -3), required less cumulative morphine iv at 24 hr (difference of the means, -6.1 mg; 95% CI, -10.5 to -1.6), and resulted in a higher incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis (18/20 vs 0/20 patients, respectively; P < 0.001). Although postoperative pain scores at one, two, and three hours appeared lower in the ISB group, the upper bounds of the 99% CIs did not exceed the equivalence margin. CONCLUSION: Compared with ICB-SSB, ISB provided non-equivalent (i.e., lower) postoperative pain scores 30 min after arthroscopic shoulder surgery. Thereafter, postoperative analgesia was comparable between the two groups. Further trials are required to compare ISB with ICB-SSB using a proximal (i.e., costoclavicular) technique for ICB. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.clinicaltrials.gov , NCT02993939. Registered 12 December 2016. SN - 1496-8975 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/29270914/A_randomized_comparison_between_interscalene_and_combined_infraclavicular_suprascapular_blocks_for_arthroscopic_shoulder_surgery_ DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -