Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Lateral Medullary Infarction with or without Extra-Lateral Medullary Lesions: What Is the Difference?
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2018; 45(3-4):132-140.CD

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lateral medullary infarction (LMI) is not an uncommon disease. Although lesions are usually restricted to the lateral medullary area, some patients have additional infarcts in other parts of the brain. The clinical features and prognosis of isolated LMI (pure LMI, LMIpr) have been investigated. However, it remains unclear whether clinical characteristics, prognosis and factors associated with prognosis differ between patients with LMIpr and those with additional lesions (LMI plus, LMIpl).

METHODS

Patients with LMI identified by MRI were enrolled. The demographic and clinical characteristics, in-hospital outcome (intensive care unit [ICU] admission, pneumonia and modified Rankin scale [mRS] at discharge), and long-term residual symptoms (vertigo/dizziness, sensory disturbances, dysphagia) and outcomes (occurrence of stroke, acute coronary syndrome [ACS], death, and mRS at follow-up) were compared between LMIpr and LMIpl patients. Factors associated with poor functional outcome (mRS 2-6) at the follow-up were analyzed.

RESULTS

Among 248 LMI patients, 161 (64.9%) had LMIpr and 87 (35.1%) had LMIpl. During admission, patients with LMIpl more frequently experienced ICU care, pneumonia and had a higher discharge mRS (3 vs. 2; p < 0.001) than LMIpr patients. The occurrence of stroke, ACS, frequency of death and functional outcome was not different during follow-up. However, residual neurologic symptoms such as dizziness (p = 0.002), dysphagia (p = 0.04) and sensory symptoms (p < 0.001) were more frequent in LMIpr than in LMIpl patients. In LMIpr patients, the rostral location of LMI was associated with poor functional outcome (p = 0.041), whereas in LMIpl patients, the presence of medial posterior-inferior cerebellar artery lesion was associated with good functional outcome (p = 0.030).

CONCLUSION

Although the short-term outcome is poorer in LMIpl than LMIpr patients, long-term residual symptoms are more common in LMIpr patients. The location of the LMI and extra-medullary lesion affects the long-term functional outcome of LMIpr and LMIpl patients respectively.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Department of Neurology, Chosun University Hospital, Gwang-ju, Republic of Korea.Department of Neurology, Kyung Hee University Hospital, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.Departments of Neurology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.Departments of Neurology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.Departments of Neurology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.Departments of Neurology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Pub Type(s)

Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Language

eng

PubMed ID

29558752

Citation

Kang, Hyun Goo, et al. "Lateral Medullary Infarction With or Without Extra-Lateral Medullary Lesions: what Is the Difference?" Cerebrovascular Diseases (Basel, Switzerland), vol. 45, no. 3-4, 2018, pp. 132-140.
Kang HG, Kim BJ, Lee SH, et al. Lateral Medullary Infarction with or without Extra-Lateral Medullary Lesions: What Is the Difference? Cerebrovasc Dis. 2018;45(3-4):132-140.
Kang, H. G., Kim, B. J., Lee, S. H., Kang, D. W., Kwon, S. U., & Kim, J. S. (2018). Lateral Medullary Infarction with or without Extra-Lateral Medullary Lesions: What Is the Difference? Cerebrovascular Diseases (Basel, Switzerland), 45(3-4), 132-140. https://doi.org/10.1159/000487672
Kang HG, et al. Lateral Medullary Infarction With or Without Extra-Lateral Medullary Lesions: what Is the Difference. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2018;45(3-4):132-140. PubMed PMID: 29558752.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Lateral Medullary Infarction with or without Extra-Lateral Medullary Lesions: What Is the Difference? AU - Kang,Hyun Goo, AU - Kim,Bum Joon, AU - Lee,Sang Hun, AU - Kang,Dong-Wha, AU - Kwon,Sun U, AU - Kim,Jong S, Y1 - 2018/03/20/ PY - 2017/11/25/received PY - 2018/02/13/accepted PY - 2018/3/21/pubmed PY - 2019/3/15/medline PY - 2018/3/21/entrez KW - Lateral medullary infarction KW - Prognosis KW - Stroke mechanism SP - 132 EP - 140 JF - Cerebrovascular diseases (Basel, Switzerland) JO - Cerebrovasc Dis VL - 45 IS - 3-4 N2 - BACKGROUND: Lateral medullary infarction (LMI) is not an uncommon disease. Although lesions are usually restricted to the lateral medullary area, some patients have additional infarcts in other parts of the brain. The clinical features and prognosis of isolated LMI (pure LMI, LMIpr) have been investigated. However, it remains unclear whether clinical characteristics, prognosis and factors associated with prognosis differ between patients with LMIpr and those with additional lesions (LMI plus, LMIpl). METHODS: Patients with LMI identified by MRI were enrolled. The demographic and clinical characteristics, in-hospital outcome (intensive care unit [ICU] admission, pneumonia and modified Rankin scale [mRS] at discharge), and long-term residual symptoms (vertigo/dizziness, sensory disturbances, dysphagia) and outcomes (occurrence of stroke, acute coronary syndrome [ACS], death, and mRS at follow-up) were compared between LMIpr and LMIpl patients. Factors associated with poor functional outcome (mRS 2-6) at the follow-up were analyzed. RESULTS: Among 248 LMI patients, 161 (64.9%) had LMIpr and 87 (35.1%) had LMIpl. During admission, patients with LMIpl more frequently experienced ICU care, pneumonia and had a higher discharge mRS (3 vs. 2; p < 0.001) than LMIpr patients. The occurrence of stroke, ACS, frequency of death and functional outcome was not different during follow-up. However, residual neurologic symptoms such as dizziness (p = 0.002), dysphagia (p = 0.04) and sensory symptoms (p < 0.001) were more frequent in LMIpr than in LMIpl patients. In LMIpr patients, the rostral location of LMI was associated with poor functional outcome (p = 0.041), whereas in LMIpl patients, the presence of medial posterior-inferior cerebellar artery lesion was associated with good functional outcome (p = 0.030). CONCLUSION: Although the short-term outcome is poorer in LMIpl than LMIpr patients, long-term residual symptoms are more common in LMIpr patients. The location of the LMI and extra-medullary lesion affects the long-term functional outcome of LMIpr and LMIpl patients respectively. SN - 1421-9786 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/29558752/Lateral_Medullary_Infarction_with_or_without_Extra_Lateral_Medullary_Lesions:_What_Is_the_Difference DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -