Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Outcomes of stress urinary incontinence in women undergoing TOT versus Burch colposuspension with abdominal sacrocolpopexy.
Int Urogynecol J. 2019 Feb; 30(2):245-250.IU

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

To compare postoperative rates of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in patients with pelvic organ prolapse and SUI undergoing abdominal sacrocolpopexy (ASC) with Burch colposuspension or a transobturator tape (TOT) sling.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, medical records of 117 patients who underwent ASC with Burch (n = 60) or TOT (n = 57) between 2008 and 2010 at NYU Winthrop Hospital were assessed. Preoperative evaluation included history, physical examination, cough stress test (CST), and multichannel urodynamic studies (MUDS). Primary outcomes were postoperative continence at follow-up up to 12 weeks. Patients considered incontinent reported symptoms of SUI and had a positive CST or MUDS. Secondary outcomes included intra- and postoperative complications. Associations were analyzed by Fisher's exact, McNemar's and Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney tests.

RESULTS

The groups were similar regarding age, BMI, parity, Valsalva leak point pressure (VLPP), and prior abdominal surgery (p = 0.07-0.76). They differed regarding preoperative SUI diagnosed by self-reported symptoms, CST, or MUDS (TOT 89.5-94.7%, Burch 60.7-76.3%, p < 0.0001-0.007). The TOT group had lower rates of postoperative SUI (TOT 12.5%, Burch 30%, OR = 0.15, 95% CI 0.04, 0.62). Relative risk reduction (RRR) in postoperative SUI for the TOT group compared with the Burch group was 79%-86%. There were no differences concerning intra- and postoperative complications. The Burch group had a higher rate of reoperation for persistent/recurrent SUI (Burch 25%, TOT 12% p = 0.078).

CONCLUSIONS

The TOT group experienced a greater reduction in postoperative incontinence, and the Burch group underwent more repeat surgeries. The TOT sling may be superior in patients undergoing concomitant ASC.

Links

Publisher Full Text (DOI)

Authors+Show Affiliations

Lazarou G
Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Women's Health, NYU Winthrop Hospital, 259 First Street, Mineola, NY, 11501, USA. glazarou@nyuwinthrop.org.
Minis E
Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Women's Health, NYU Winthrop Hospital, 259 First Street, Mineola, NY, 11501, USA.
Grigorescu B
Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Women's Health, NYU Winthrop Hospital, 259 First Street, Mineola, NY, 11501, USA.

MeSH

AbdomenAdultColposcopyCombined Modality TherapyFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPelvic Organ ProlapsePostoperative ComplicationsReoperationRetrospective StudiesSacrumSuburethral SlingsTreatment OutcomeUrinary Incontinence, Stress

Pub Type(s)

Evaluation Study
Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

29725708

Citation

Lazarou, George, et al. "Outcomes of Stress Urinary Incontinence in Women Undergoing TOT Versus Burch Colposuspension With Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy." International Urogynecology Journal, vol. 30, no. 2, 2019, pp. 245-250.
Lazarou G, Minis E, Grigorescu B. Outcomes of stress urinary incontinence in women undergoing TOT versus Burch colposuspension with abdominal sacrocolpopexy. Int Urogynecol J. 2019;30(2):245-250.
Lazarou, G., Minis, E., & Grigorescu, B. (2019). Outcomes of stress urinary incontinence in women undergoing TOT versus Burch colposuspension with abdominal sacrocolpopexy. International Urogynecology Journal, 30(2), 245-250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-018-3668-5
Lazarou G, Minis E, Grigorescu B. Outcomes of Stress Urinary Incontinence in Women Undergoing TOT Versus Burch Colposuspension With Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy. Int Urogynecol J. 2019;30(2):245-250. PubMed PMID: 29725708.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Outcomes of stress urinary incontinence in women undergoing TOT versus Burch colposuspension with abdominal sacrocolpopexy. AU - Lazarou,George, AU - Minis,Evelyn, AU - Grigorescu,Bogdan, Y1 - 2018/05/03/ PY - 2018/02/05/received PY - 2018/04/25/accepted PY - 2018/5/5/pubmed PY - 2019/12/25/medline PY - 2018/5/5/entrez KW - Abdominal sacral colpopexy KW - Burch colposuspension KW - Pelvic organ prolapse KW - Stress urinary incontinence KW - Transobturator tape sling SP - 245 EP - 250 JF - International urogynecology journal JO - Int Urogynecol J VL - 30 IS - 2 N2 - INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: To compare postoperative rates of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in patients with pelvic organ prolapse and SUI undergoing abdominal sacrocolpopexy (ASC) with Burch colposuspension or a transobturator tape (TOT) sling. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, medical records of 117 patients who underwent ASC with Burch (n = 60) or TOT (n = 57) between 2008 and 2010 at NYU Winthrop Hospital were assessed. Preoperative evaluation included history, physical examination, cough stress test (CST), and multichannel urodynamic studies (MUDS). Primary outcomes were postoperative continence at follow-up up to 12 weeks. Patients considered incontinent reported symptoms of SUI and had a positive CST or MUDS. Secondary outcomes included intra- and postoperative complications. Associations were analyzed by Fisher's exact, McNemar's and Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney tests. RESULTS: The groups were similar regarding age, BMI, parity, Valsalva leak point pressure (VLPP), and prior abdominal surgery (p = 0.07-0.76). They differed regarding preoperative SUI diagnosed by self-reported symptoms, CST, or MUDS (TOT 89.5-94.7%, Burch 60.7-76.3%, p < 0.0001-0.007). The TOT group had lower rates of postoperative SUI (TOT 12.5%, Burch 30%, OR = 0.15, 95% CI 0.04, 0.62). Relative risk reduction (RRR) in postoperative SUI for the TOT group compared with the Burch group was 79%-86%. There were no differences concerning intra- and postoperative complications. The Burch group had a higher rate of reoperation for persistent/recurrent SUI (Burch 25%, TOT 12% p = 0.078). CONCLUSIONS: The TOT group experienced a greater reduction in postoperative incontinence, and the Burch group underwent more repeat surgeries. The TOT sling may be superior in patients undergoing concomitant ASC. SN - 1433-3023 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/29725708/Outcomes_of_stress_urinary_incontinence_in_women_undergoing_TOT_versus_Burch_colposuspension_with_abdominal_sacrocolpopexy_ DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -