Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Systematic review assessing the effectiveness of dietary intervention on gut microbiota in adults with type 2 diabetes.
Diabetologia. 2018 08; 61(8):1700-1711.D

Abstract

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS

Despite improved understanding of the pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes mellitus, explanations for individual variability in disease progression and response to treatment are incomplete. The gut microbiota has been linked to the pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes mellitus and may account for this variability. We conducted a systematic review to assess the effectiveness of dietary and physical activity/exercise interventions in modulating the gut microbiota and improving glucose control in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted to identify studies reporting on the effect of dietary and physical activity/exercise interventions on the gut microbiota and glucose control in individuals with a confirmed diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Study characteristics, methodological quality and details relating to interventions were captured using a data-extraction form. Meta-analyses were conducted where sufficient data were available, and other results were reported narratively.

RESULTS

Eight studies met the eligibility criteria of the systematic review. No studies were found that reported on the effects of physical activity/exercise on the gut microbiota and glucose control. However, studies reporting on dietary interventions showed that such interventions were associated with modifications to the composition and diversity of the gut microbiota. There was a statistically significant improvement in HbA1c (standardised mean difference [SMD] -2.31 mmol/mol [95% CI -2.76, -1.85] [0.21%; 95% CI -0.26, -0.16]; I2 = 0%, p < 0.01), but not in fasting blood glucose (SMD -0.25 mmol/l [95% CI -0.85, 0.35], I2 = 87%, p > 0.05), fasting insulin (SMD -1.82 pmol/l [95% CI -7.23, 3.60], I2 = 54%, p > 0.05) or HOMA-IR (SMD -0.15 [95% CI -0.63, 0.32], I2 = 69%, p > 0.05) when comparing dietary interventions with comparator groups. There were no significant changes in the relative abundance of bacteria in the genera Bifidobacterium (SMD 1.29% [95% CI -4.45, 7.03], I2 = 33%, p > 0.05), Roseburia (SMD -0.85% [95% CI -2.91, 1.21], I2 = 79%, p > 0.05) or Lactobacillus (SMD 0.04% [95% CI -0.01, 0.09], I2 = 0%, p > 0.05) when comparing dietary interventions with comparator groups. There were, however, other significant changes in the gut microbiota, including changes at various taxonomic levels, including phylum, family, genus and species, Firmicutes:Bacteroidetes ratios and changes in diversity matrices (α and β). Dietary intervention had minimal or no effect on inflammation, short-chain fatty acids or anthropometrics.

CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION

Dietary intervention was found to modulate the gut microbiota and improve glucose control in individuals with type 2 diabetes. Although the results of the included studies are encouraging, this review highlights the need for further well-conducted interventional studies to inform the clinical use of dietary interventions targeting the gut microbiota.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Institute of Cellular Medicine, 4th Floor William Leech Building, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK. david.houghton@ncl.ac.uk.Institute of Cellular Medicine, 4th Floor William Leech Building, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK. Liver Unit, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.Department of Molecular Virology and Microbiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.Institute of Cellular Medicine, 4th Floor William Leech Building, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK. Liver Unit, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.Institute of Cellular Medicine, 4th Floor William Leech Building, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK.Institute of Cellular Medicine, 4th Floor William Leech Building, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK.

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Systematic Review

Language

eng

PubMed ID

29754286

Citation

Houghton, David, et al. "Systematic Review Assessing the Effectiveness of Dietary Intervention On Gut Microbiota in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes." Diabetologia, vol. 61, no. 8, 2018, pp. 1700-1711.
Houghton D, Hardy T, Stewart C, et al. Systematic review assessing the effectiveness of dietary intervention on gut microbiota in adults with type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia. 2018;61(8):1700-1711.
Houghton, D., Hardy, T., Stewart, C., Errington, L., Day, C. P., Trenell, M. I., & Avery, L. (2018). Systematic review assessing the effectiveness of dietary intervention on gut microbiota in adults with type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia, 61(8), 1700-1711. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-018-4632-0
Houghton D, et al. Systematic Review Assessing the Effectiveness of Dietary Intervention On Gut Microbiota in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetologia. 2018;61(8):1700-1711. PubMed PMID: 29754286.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Systematic review assessing the effectiveness of dietary intervention on gut microbiota in adults with type 2 diabetes. AU - Houghton,David, AU - Hardy,Timothy, AU - Stewart,Christopher, AU - Errington,Linda, AU - Day,Christopher P, AU - Trenell,Michael I, AU - Avery,Leah, Y1 - 2018/05/12/ PY - 2017/12/11/received PY - 2018/03/05/accepted PY - 2018/5/14/pubmed PY - 2019/9/10/medline PY - 2018/5/14/entrez KW - Diet KW - Exercise KW - Gut microbiota KW - Intervention KW - Physical activity KW - Systematic review KW - Type 2 diabetes SP - 1700 EP - 1711 JF - Diabetologia JO - Diabetologia VL - 61 IS - 8 N2 - AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Despite improved understanding of the pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes mellitus, explanations for individual variability in disease progression and response to treatment are incomplete. The gut microbiota has been linked to the pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes mellitus and may account for this variability. We conducted a systematic review to assess the effectiveness of dietary and physical activity/exercise interventions in modulating the gut microbiota and improving glucose control in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted to identify studies reporting on the effect of dietary and physical activity/exercise interventions on the gut microbiota and glucose control in individuals with a confirmed diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Study characteristics, methodological quality and details relating to interventions were captured using a data-extraction form. Meta-analyses were conducted where sufficient data were available, and other results were reported narratively. RESULTS: Eight studies met the eligibility criteria of the systematic review. No studies were found that reported on the effects of physical activity/exercise on the gut microbiota and glucose control. However, studies reporting on dietary interventions showed that such interventions were associated with modifications to the composition and diversity of the gut microbiota. There was a statistically significant improvement in HbA1c (standardised mean difference [SMD] -2.31 mmol/mol [95% CI -2.76, -1.85] [0.21%; 95% CI -0.26, -0.16]; I2 = 0%, p < 0.01), but not in fasting blood glucose (SMD -0.25 mmol/l [95% CI -0.85, 0.35], I2 = 87%, p > 0.05), fasting insulin (SMD -1.82 pmol/l [95% CI -7.23, 3.60], I2 = 54%, p > 0.05) or HOMA-IR (SMD -0.15 [95% CI -0.63, 0.32], I2 = 69%, p > 0.05) when comparing dietary interventions with comparator groups. There were no significant changes in the relative abundance of bacteria in the genera Bifidobacterium (SMD 1.29% [95% CI -4.45, 7.03], I2 = 33%, p > 0.05), Roseburia (SMD -0.85% [95% CI -2.91, 1.21], I2 = 79%, p > 0.05) or Lactobacillus (SMD 0.04% [95% CI -0.01, 0.09], I2 = 0%, p > 0.05) when comparing dietary interventions with comparator groups. There were, however, other significant changes in the gut microbiota, including changes at various taxonomic levels, including phylum, family, genus and species, Firmicutes:Bacteroidetes ratios and changes in diversity matrices (α and β). Dietary intervention had minimal or no effect on inflammation, short-chain fatty acids or anthropometrics. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: Dietary intervention was found to modulate the gut microbiota and improve glucose control in individuals with type 2 diabetes. Although the results of the included studies are encouraging, this review highlights the need for further well-conducted interventional studies to inform the clinical use of dietary interventions targeting the gut microbiota. SN - 1432-0428 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/29754286/Systematic_review_assessing_the_effectiveness_of_dietary_intervention_on_gut_microbiota_in_adults_with_type_2_diabetes_ DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -