Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Gestational weight gain in Chinese women -- results from a retrospective cohort in Changsha, China.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 May 29; 18(1):185.BP

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The generalizability of the gestational weight gain (GWG) ranges recommended by the Institute of Medicine (IOM) to Chinese women is disputed.

METHODS

In 2016, 16,780 pregnant women who gave birth to live singletons in Changsha, China, were enrolled. First, subjects with optimal pregnancy outcomes were identified for the GWG percentile distribution description and for comparison to the IOM recommendations. Second, all subjects with optimal GWG according to the IOM body mass index (BMI) cutoffs and those with optimal GWG according to the Asian BMI cutoffs were selected. Pregnancy outcomes were compared between those two groups.

RESULTS

A total of 13,717 births with optimal pregnancy outcomes were selected to describe the GWG distribution. The height and central position of the GWG distributions determined by the Asian BMI cutoffs differed from those determined by the IOM BMI cutoffs among the overweight and obese groups. The recommended IOM GWG ranges were narrower than and shifted to the left of the observed distributions. In both BMI classification schemes, however, the IOM-recommended ranges were within the middle 70% (Pc 15th-85th) and 50% (Pc 25th-75th) of the observed distribution. A total of 6438 (38.37%) and 6110 (36.41%) women gained optimal GWG, according to the IOM and Asian BMI classifications, respectively. Compared with those with optimal GWG according to IOM BMI cutoffs, women with optimal GWG according to the Asian BMI cutoffs had lower risks of both macrosomia (adjusted OR = 0.79, 95%CI: 0.67-0.94) and large-for-gestational age (adjusted OR = 0.86, 95%CI: 0.76, 0.98). However, no significantly different risks of preterm, low birthweight, small-for-gestational age, pregnancy-induced hypertension, or gestational diabetes were found between them.

CONCLUSIONS

The IOM-recommended GWG ranges are within the middle 70% of the distributions in Chinese women, and pre-pregnancy weight status should be determined by the Asian BMI cut-off points for monitoring and making GWG recommendations to Chinese women.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Department of Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, Hunan, China.Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, Xiangya School of Public Health, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.Maternity and Child Care Hospital of Yuelu District, Changsha, Hunan, China.Maternity and Child Care Hospital of Tianxin District, Changsha, Hunan, China.Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, 138 Tongzipo Road, Yuelu District, Changsha, 410013, Hunan, Province, China. 615871972@qq.com.Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, 138 Tongzipo Road, Yuelu District, Changsha, 410013, Hunan, Province, China. junlei.xy3yy@hotmail.com.

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

29843642

Citation

Huang, Xin, et al. "Gestational Weight Gain in Chinese Women -- Results From a Retrospective Cohort in Changsha, China." BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, vol. 18, no. 1, 2018, p. 185.
Huang X, Tan H, Cai M, et al. Gestational weight gain in Chinese women -- results from a retrospective cohort in Changsha, China. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018;18(1):185.
Huang, X., Tan, H., Cai, M., Shi, T., Mi, C., & Lei, J. (2018). Gestational weight gain in Chinese women -- results from a retrospective cohort in Changsha, China. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 18(1), 185. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-1833-y
Huang X, et al. Gestational Weight Gain in Chinese Women -- Results From a Retrospective Cohort in Changsha, China. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 May 29;18(1):185. PubMed PMID: 29843642.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Gestational weight gain in Chinese women -- results from a retrospective cohort in Changsha, China. AU - Huang,Xin, AU - Tan,Hongzhuan, AU - Cai,Ming, AU - Shi,Ting, AU - Mi,Chunmei, AU - Lei,Jun, Y1 - 2018/05/29/ PY - 2018/01/21/received PY - 2018/05/17/accepted PY - 2018/5/31/entrez PY - 2018/5/31/pubmed PY - 2019/3/16/medline KW - Body mass index KW - Chinese women KW - Gestational weight gain KW - Pregnancy SP - 185 EP - 185 JF - BMC pregnancy and childbirth JO - BMC Pregnancy Childbirth VL - 18 IS - 1 N2 - BACKGROUND: The generalizability of the gestational weight gain (GWG) ranges recommended by the Institute of Medicine (IOM) to Chinese women is disputed. METHODS: In 2016, 16,780 pregnant women who gave birth to live singletons in Changsha, China, were enrolled. First, subjects with optimal pregnancy outcomes were identified for the GWG percentile distribution description and for comparison to the IOM recommendations. Second, all subjects with optimal GWG according to the IOM body mass index (BMI) cutoffs and those with optimal GWG according to the Asian BMI cutoffs were selected. Pregnancy outcomes were compared between those two groups. RESULTS: A total of 13,717 births with optimal pregnancy outcomes were selected to describe the GWG distribution. The height and central position of the GWG distributions determined by the Asian BMI cutoffs differed from those determined by the IOM BMI cutoffs among the overweight and obese groups. The recommended IOM GWG ranges were narrower than and shifted to the left of the observed distributions. In both BMI classification schemes, however, the IOM-recommended ranges were within the middle 70% (Pc 15th-85th) and 50% (Pc 25th-75th) of the observed distribution. A total of 6438 (38.37%) and 6110 (36.41%) women gained optimal GWG, according to the IOM and Asian BMI classifications, respectively. Compared with those with optimal GWG according to IOM BMI cutoffs, women with optimal GWG according to the Asian BMI cutoffs had lower risks of both macrosomia (adjusted OR = 0.79, 95%CI: 0.67-0.94) and large-for-gestational age (adjusted OR = 0.86, 95%CI: 0.76, 0.98). However, no significantly different risks of preterm, low birthweight, small-for-gestational age, pregnancy-induced hypertension, or gestational diabetes were found between them. CONCLUSIONS: The IOM-recommended GWG ranges are within the middle 70% of the distributions in Chinese women, and pre-pregnancy weight status should be determined by the Asian BMI cut-off points for monitoring and making GWG recommendations to Chinese women. SN - 1471-2393 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/29843642/Gestational_weight_gain_in_Chinese_women____results_from_a_retrospective_cohort_in_Changsha_China_ L2 - https://bmcpregnancychildbirth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12884-018-1833-y DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -