Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Carrying asymmetric loads during stair negotiation: Loaded limb stance vs. unloaded limb stance.
Gait Posture. 2018 Jul; 64:213-219.GP

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Individuals often carry items in one hand instead of both hands during activities of daily living. Research Question The purpose of this study was to investigate low back and lower extremity frontal plane moments for loaded limb stance and unloaded limb stance when carrying symmetric and asymmetric loads during stair negotiation.

METHODS

Participants were instructed to ascend and descend a three-step staircase at preferred pace using a right leg lead and a left leg lead for each load condition: no load, 20% body weight (BW) bilateral load, and 20% BW unilateral load. L5/S1 contralateral bending, hip abduction, external knee varus, and ankle inversion moments were calculated using inverse dynamics.

RESULTS

Peak L5/S1 contralateral bending moments were significantly higher when carrying a 20% BW unilateral load as compared to a 20% BW bilateral load for both stair ascent and stair descent. In addition, peak L5/S1 contralateral bending moments were significantly higher during step one than for step two. Peak external knee varus and hip abduction moments were significantly higher in unloaded limb stance as compared to loaded limb stance when carrying a 20% BW unilateral load.

SIGNIFICANCE

General load carriage recommendations include carrying less than 20% BW loads and splitting loads bilaterally when feasible. Assessment recommendations include analyzing the first stair step and analyzing both the loaded and unloaded limbs.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA. Electronic address: Jwang0408@email.arizona.edu.Department of Kinesiology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA.

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

29933184

Citation

Wang, Junsig, and Jason C. Gillette. "Carrying Asymmetric Loads During Stair Negotiation: Loaded Limb Stance Vs. Unloaded Limb Stance." Gait & Posture, vol. 64, 2018, pp. 213-219.
Wang J, Gillette JC. Carrying asymmetric loads during stair negotiation: Loaded limb stance vs. unloaded limb stance. Gait Posture. 2018;64:213-219.
Wang, J., & Gillette, J. C. (2018). Carrying asymmetric loads during stair negotiation: Loaded limb stance vs. unloaded limb stance. Gait & Posture, 64, 213-219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.06.113
Wang J, Gillette JC. Carrying Asymmetric Loads During Stair Negotiation: Loaded Limb Stance Vs. Unloaded Limb Stance. Gait Posture. 2018;64:213-219. PubMed PMID: 29933184.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Carrying asymmetric loads during stair negotiation: Loaded limb stance vs. unloaded limb stance. AU - Wang,Junsig, AU - Gillette,Jason C, Y1 - 2018/06/19/ PY - 2017/06/22/received PY - 2018/06/08/revised PY - 2018/06/17/accepted PY - 2018/6/23/pubmed PY - 2018/11/6/medline PY - 2018/6/23/entrez KW - Asymmetric load KW - Gait KW - Joint moments KW - L5S1 KW - Stair negotiation SP - 213 EP - 219 JF - Gait & posture JO - Gait Posture VL - 64 N2 - BACKGROUND: Individuals often carry items in one hand instead of both hands during activities of daily living. Research Question The purpose of this study was to investigate low back and lower extremity frontal plane moments for loaded limb stance and unloaded limb stance when carrying symmetric and asymmetric loads during stair negotiation. METHODS: Participants were instructed to ascend and descend a three-step staircase at preferred pace using a right leg lead and a left leg lead for each load condition: no load, 20% body weight (BW) bilateral load, and 20% BW unilateral load. L5/S1 contralateral bending, hip abduction, external knee varus, and ankle inversion moments were calculated using inverse dynamics. RESULTS: Peak L5/S1 contralateral bending moments were significantly higher when carrying a 20% BW unilateral load as compared to a 20% BW bilateral load for both stair ascent and stair descent. In addition, peak L5/S1 contralateral bending moments were significantly higher during step one than for step two. Peak external knee varus and hip abduction moments were significantly higher in unloaded limb stance as compared to loaded limb stance when carrying a 20% BW unilateral load. SIGNIFICANCE: General load carriage recommendations include carrying less than 20% BW loads and splitting loads bilaterally when feasible. Assessment recommendations include analyzing the first stair step and analyzing both the loaded and unloaded limbs. SN - 1879-2219 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/29933184/Carrying_asymmetric_loads_during_stair_negotiation:_Loaded_limb_stance_vs__unloaded_limb_stance_ DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -