Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Characterization of Corneal Donor Tissue Lesions by Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography Compared With Eye Bank Technician Slit-Lamp Examination.
Cornea 2018; 37(10):1318-1323C

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare anterior segment spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) with eye bank technician slit-lamp examination (SLE) in characterizing lesions in donor corneas.

METHODS

Twenty-nine donor corneas identified by eye bank technicians to have opacities or lesions potentially representing pathologic findings affecting the stroma were evaluated through the use of technician SLE, SLE photography, and OCT. Technicians were tasked with describing the lesion, estimating the lesion depth, and photographing their SLE findings. A masked grader evaluated the OCT images and measured the lesion depth using customized software. The lesions identified on OCT were then compared with those identified on SLE.

RESULTS

A total of 37 lesions were detected on SLE; 25 of the 37 lesions identified on SLE were matched to a lesion on OCT. SLE and OCT depth measurements were statistically significantly different (P = 0.0042, mean difference 4.8% ± 6.5%), and OCT graded lesions as slightly deeper. Of the 12 out of the 37 lesions that were noted on SLE (but not identified on OCT), these included 2 central and paracentral anterior stromal lesions (OCT showed loose epithelium), 5 peripheral anterior stromal lesions, and 5 corneas with LASIK.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study highlights both advantages and limitations of OCT compared with technician SLE in the evaluation of donor corneal tissue. Although OCT may miss some peripheral lesions and LASIK scars that are identifiable on SLE, OCT's depth resolution is helpful in differentiating whether shallow anterior opacities actually extend deeper into the stroma or are confined superficially to the epithelium.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Department of Ophthalmology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.Miracles in Sight, Winston-Salem, NC.Miracles in Sight, Winston-Salem, NC.Department of Ophthalmology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.Department of Ophthalmology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.Department of Ophthalmology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC. Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC.Department of Ophthalmology, Vanderbilt Eye Institute, Nashville, TN.

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

30044250

Citation

Hsu, S Tammy, et al. "Characterization of Corneal Donor Tissue Lesions By Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography Compared With Eye Bank Technician Slit-Lamp Examination." Cornea, vol. 37, no. 10, 2018, pp. 1318-1323.
Hsu ST, Perry I, Botsay S, et al. Characterization of Corneal Donor Tissue Lesions by Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography Compared With Eye Bank Technician Slit-Lamp Examination. Cornea. 2018;37(10):1318-1323.
Hsu, S. T., Perry, I., Botsay, S., Ko, N., Stinnett, S. S., Kuo, A. N., & Shieh, C. (2018). Characterization of Corneal Donor Tissue Lesions by Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography Compared With Eye Bank Technician Slit-Lamp Examination. Cornea, 37(10), pp. 1318-1323. doi:10.1097/ICO.0000000000001700.
Hsu ST, et al. Characterization of Corneal Donor Tissue Lesions By Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography Compared With Eye Bank Technician Slit-Lamp Examination. Cornea. 2018;37(10):1318-1323. PubMed PMID: 30044250.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Characterization of Corneal Donor Tissue Lesions by Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography Compared With Eye Bank Technician Slit-Lamp Examination. AU - Hsu,S Tammy, AU - Perry,Isaac, AU - Botsay,Sara, AU - Ko,Narae, AU - Stinnett,Sandra S, AU - Kuo,Anthony N, AU - Shieh,Christine, PY - 2018/7/26/pubmed PY - 2018/10/26/medline PY - 2018/7/26/entrez SP - 1318 EP - 1323 JF - Cornea JO - Cornea VL - 37 IS - 10 N2 - PURPOSE: To compare anterior segment spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) with eye bank technician slit-lamp examination (SLE) in characterizing lesions in donor corneas. METHODS: Twenty-nine donor corneas identified by eye bank technicians to have opacities or lesions potentially representing pathologic findings affecting the stroma were evaluated through the use of technician SLE, SLE photography, and OCT. Technicians were tasked with describing the lesion, estimating the lesion depth, and photographing their SLE findings. A masked grader evaluated the OCT images and measured the lesion depth using customized software. The lesions identified on OCT were then compared with those identified on SLE. RESULTS: A total of 37 lesions were detected on SLE; 25 of the 37 lesions identified on SLE were matched to a lesion on OCT. SLE and OCT depth measurements were statistically significantly different (P = 0.0042, mean difference 4.8% ± 6.5%), and OCT graded lesions as slightly deeper. Of the 12 out of the 37 lesions that were noted on SLE (but not identified on OCT), these included 2 central and paracentral anterior stromal lesions (OCT showed loose epithelium), 5 peripheral anterior stromal lesions, and 5 corneas with LASIK. CONCLUSIONS: Our study highlights both advantages and limitations of OCT compared with technician SLE in the evaluation of donor corneal tissue. Although OCT may miss some peripheral lesions and LASIK scars that are identifiable on SLE, OCT's depth resolution is helpful in differentiating whether shallow anterior opacities actually extend deeper into the stroma or are confined superficially to the epithelium. SN - 1536-4798 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/30044250/Characterization_of_Corneal_Donor_Tissue_Lesions_by_Anterior_Segment_Optical_Coherence_Tomography_Compared_With_Eye_Bank_Technician_Slit_Lamp_Examination_ L2 - http://Insights.ovid.com/pubmed?pmid=30044250 DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -