Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Dosimetric effects of a repositioning head frame system and treatment planning system dose calculation accuracy.
J Appl Clin Med Phys 2018; 19(6):124-132JA

Abstract

This work aims to study the effect on surface dose and dose distribution caused by the Elekta Fraxion cranial immobilization system. The effect of Fraxion inclusion in Elekta Monaco treatment planning system and its calculation accuracy is also checked. To study the dose attenuation, a cylindrical phantom was located over the Elekta Fraxion with an IBA CC13 ionization chamber placed in the central insert at the linac isocenter. Dose measurements at multiple gantry angles were performed for three open fields, 10 × 10 cm, 5 × 5 cm and other smaller 2 × 2 cm. Measured doses were compared with the ones calculated by Monaco. Surface dose and dose distribution in the buildup region were measured placing several Gafchromic Films EBT3 at linac CAX between the slabs of a RW3 phantom located over Fraxion and read using FilmQA Pro software. Measures were performed for two open field sizes and results were compared with Monaco calculations. Measurements show a 1% attenuation for 180° gantry angle but it can be as high as 3.4% (5 × 5 open field) for 150°/210° gantry angle, as with these angles the beam goes through the Fraxion's headrest twice. If Fraxion is not included in the calculation Monaco calculation can result in a 3% difference between measured and calculated doses, while with Fraxion in the calculation, the maximum difference is 0.9%. Fraxion increases 3.7 times the surface dose, which can be calculated by Monaco with a difference lower than 2%. Monaco also calculated correctly the PDD for both open fields (2%) when Fraxion is included in the calculation. This work shows that the attenuation varies with gantry angle. The inclusion of Fraxion in Monaco improves the calculation from 3% difference to 1% in the worst case. Furthermore, the surface dose increment and the dose in the buildup region are correctly calculated.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Department of Medical Physics and Radiation Protection, H.U. La Paz, Madrid, Spain.Department of Medical Physics and Radiation Protection, H.U. La Paz, Madrid, Spain.Department of Medical Physics and Radiation Protection, H.U. La Paz, Madrid, Spain.Department of Medical Physics and Radiation Protection, H.U. La Paz, Madrid, Spain.Department of Medical Physics and Radiation Protection, H.U. La Paz, Madrid, Spain.

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

30255659

Citation

Ferrer, Carlos, et al. "Dosimetric Effects of a Repositioning Head Frame System and Treatment Planning System Dose Calculation Accuracy." Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, vol. 19, no. 6, 2018, pp. 124-132.
Ferrer C, Huertas C, Plaza R, et al. Dosimetric effects of a repositioning head frame system and treatment planning system dose calculation accuracy. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2018;19(6):124-132.
Ferrer, C., Huertas, C., Plaza, R., Aza, Z., & Corredoira, E. (2018). Dosimetric effects of a repositioning head frame system and treatment planning system dose calculation accuracy. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, 19(6), pp. 124-132. doi:10.1002/acm2.12456.
Ferrer C, et al. Dosimetric Effects of a Repositioning Head Frame System and Treatment Planning System Dose Calculation Accuracy. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2018;19(6):124-132. PubMed PMID: 30255659.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Dosimetric effects of a repositioning head frame system and treatment planning system dose calculation accuracy. AU - Ferrer,Carlos, AU - Huertas,Concepción, AU - Plaza,Rodrigo, AU - Aza,Zulima, AU - Corredoira,Eva, Y1 - 2018/09/25/ PY - 2018/07/02/received PY - 2018/08/16/revised PY - 2018/08/26/accepted PY - 2018/9/27/pubmed PY - 2019/3/7/medline PY - 2018/9/27/entrez KW - Fraxion KW - attenuation KW - buildup KW - surface dose KW - treatment planning SP - 124 EP - 132 JF - Journal of applied clinical medical physics JO - J Appl Clin Med Phys VL - 19 IS - 6 N2 - This work aims to study the effect on surface dose and dose distribution caused by the Elekta Fraxion cranial immobilization system. The effect of Fraxion inclusion in Elekta Monaco treatment planning system and its calculation accuracy is also checked. To study the dose attenuation, a cylindrical phantom was located over the Elekta Fraxion with an IBA CC13 ionization chamber placed in the central insert at the linac isocenter. Dose measurements at multiple gantry angles were performed for three open fields, 10 × 10 cm, 5 × 5 cm and other smaller 2 × 2 cm. Measured doses were compared with the ones calculated by Monaco. Surface dose and dose distribution in the buildup region were measured placing several Gafchromic Films EBT3 at linac CAX between the slabs of a RW3 phantom located over Fraxion and read using FilmQA Pro software. Measures were performed for two open field sizes and results were compared with Monaco calculations. Measurements show a 1% attenuation for 180° gantry angle but it can be as high as 3.4% (5 × 5 open field) for 150°/210° gantry angle, as with these angles the beam goes through the Fraxion's headrest twice. If Fraxion is not included in the calculation Monaco calculation can result in a 3% difference between measured and calculated doses, while with Fraxion in the calculation, the maximum difference is 0.9%. Fraxion increases 3.7 times the surface dose, which can be calculated by Monaco with a difference lower than 2%. Monaco also calculated correctly the PDD for both open fields (2%) when Fraxion is included in the calculation. This work shows that the attenuation varies with gantry angle. The inclusion of Fraxion in Monaco improves the calculation from 3% difference to 1% in the worst case. Furthermore, the surface dose increment and the dose in the buildup region are correctly calculated. SN - 1526-9914 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/30255659/Dosimetric_effects_of_a_repositioning_head_frame_system_and_treatment_planning_system_dose_calculation_accuracy_ L2 - https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12456 DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -