Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Surgery for Stress Urinary Incontinence: Autologous Fascial Sling.
Urol Clin North Am. 2019 Feb; 46(1):41-52.UC

Abstract

This article describes the operative technique of autologous fascial pubovaginal sling (AFPVS) surgery, examines the senior author's outcomes with AFPVS, compares these outcomes with those of other large studies and meta-analyses, and compares the safety and efficacy of AFPVS with those of the synthetic midurethral sling (SMUS). Recently, the SMUS has become the treatment of choice for most surgeons. The efficacy of the SMUS remains unchallenged and comparable with that of AFPVS, but SMUS are associated with more severe complications. In the author's opinion, the AFPVS should remain the gold standard for treating SUI.

Links

Publisher Full Text
linkinghub.elsevier.com
journals.elsevierhealth.com
Aggregator Full Text

Authors+Show Affiliations

Blaivas JG
Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1425 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10029, USA. Electronic address: jerry.blaivas@mountsinai.org.
Simma-Chiang V
Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1425 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10029, USA.
Gul Z
Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1425 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10029, USA.
Dayan L
Institute for Bladder and Prostate Research, 445 East 77 Street, New York, NY 10075, USA.
Kalkan S
Bezmialem Vakif University in Istanbul, Adnan Menderes Bulvarı Vatan Caddesi, 34093 Fatih/İstanbul, Turkey.
Daniel M
Department of Surgery, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, 450 Clarkson Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11203, USA.

MeSH

FasciaFemaleHumansSuburethral SlingsUrinary Incontinence, StressUrologic Surgical Procedures

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article
Review

Language

eng

PubMed ID

30466701

Citation

Blaivas, Jerry G., et al. "Surgery for Stress Urinary Incontinence: Autologous Fascial Sling." The Urologic Clinics of North America, vol. 46, no. 1, 2019, pp. 41-52.
Blaivas JG, Simma-Chiang V, Gul Z, et al. Surgery for Stress Urinary Incontinence: Autologous Fascial Sling. Urol Clin North Am. 2019;46(1):41-52.
Blaivas, J. G., Simma-Chiang, V., Gul, Z., Dayan, L., Kalkan, S., & Daniel, M. (2019). Surgery for Stress Urinary Incontinence: Autologous Fascial Sling. The Urologic Clinics of North America, 46(1), 41-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ucl.2018.08.014
Blaivas JG, et al. Surgery for Stress Urinary Incontinence: Autologous Fascial Sling. Urol Clin North Am. 2019;46(1):41-52. PubMed PMID: 30466701.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Surgery for Stress Urinary Incontinence: Autologous Fascial Sling. AU - Blaivas,Jerry G, AU - Simma-Chiang,Vannita, AU - Gul,Zeynep, AU - Dayan,Linda, AU - Kalkan,Senad, AU - Daniel,Melissa, PY - 2018/11/24/entrez PY - 2018/11/24/pubmed PY - 2018/12/12/medline KW - Autologous pubovaginal sling KW - Efficacy KW - Fascial sling KW - Operative technique KW - Pubovaginal sling KW - Safety KW - Stress urinary incontinence KW - Synthetic midurethral sling SP - 41 EP - 52 JF - The Urologic clinics of North America JO - Urol Clin North Am VL - 46 IS - 1 N2 - This article describes the operative technique of autologous fascial pubovaginal sling (AFPVS) surgery, examines the senior author's outcomes with AFPVS, compares these outcomes with those of other large studies and meta-analyses, and compares the safety and efficacy of AFPVS with those of the synthetic midurethral sling (SMUS). Recently, the SMUS has become the treatment of choice for most surgeons. The efficacy of the SMUS remains unchallenged and comparable with that of AFPVS, but SMUS are associated with more severe complications. In the author's opinion, the AFPVS should remain the gold standard for treating SUI. SN - 1558-318X UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/30466701/Surgery_for_Stress_Urinary_Incontinence:_Autologous_Fascial_Sling_ L2 - https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0094-0143(18)30074-0 DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -