Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Factors Related to Average Concentric Velocity of Four Barbell Exercises at Various Loads.
J Strength Cond Res. 2019 Mar; 33(3):597-605.JS

Abstract

Fahs, CA, Blumkaitis, JC, and Rossow, LM. Factors related to average concentric velocity of four barbell exercises at various loads. J Strength Cond Res 33(3): 597-605, 2019-The resistance exercise load is the primarily determinant of the average concentric velocity (ACV) during a repetition. It is unknown whether individual factors such as training experience or anthropometrics also influence the ACV. Previous research has shown the ACV during the 1 repetition maximum (1RM) varies between exercises, but it is not clear whether ACV is different between exercises at various percentages of the 1RM. This information could provide practical guidelines for trainees using ACV to select training loads. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine whether training age, current training frequency, limb length, height, and relative strength are related to ACV at loads between 35 and 100% of the 1RM for the squat, bench press, deadlift, and overhead press. A secondary purpose was to compare the ACV values between the 4 lifts at each relative load. Fifty-one (18 women and 33 men) completed 2 testing sessions in which the squat, bench press, deadlift, and overhead press ACV were measured during a modified 1RM protocol. Average concentric velocity values were significantly different among the 4 lifts (p < 0.05) at all relative loads between 35 and 100% 1RM except for 55% 1RM (p = 0.112). Generally, compared at the same relative loads, the overhead press exhibited the greatest ACV followed by the squat, bench press, and deadlift (in order). In addition, relative strength level was inversely related to ACV at maximal loads (≥95% 1RM) for the squat, bench press, and deadlift while height was positively related to ACV at moderate loads (55% 1RM) for all lifts (p < 0.05). These results suggest that the load-velocity profile is unique for each of these exercises, and that velocity ranges used for exercise prescription should be specific to the exercise. A trainee's relative strength and height may be a primary influence on the ACV.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Department of Exercise Science, Lindenwood University Belleville, Belleville, Illinois.Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri.Department of Exercise Science, Lindenwood University Belleville, Belleville, Illinois.

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

30640305

Citation

Fahs, Christopher A., et al. "Factors Related to Average Concentric Velocity of Four Barbell Exercises at Various Loads." Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, vol. 33, no. 3, 2019, pp. 597-605.
Fahs CA, Blumkaitis JC, Rossow LM. Factors Related to Average Concentric Velocity of Four Barbell Exercises at Various Loads. J Strength Cond Res. 2019;33(3):597-605.
Fahs, C. A., Blumkaitis, J. C., & Rossow, L. M. (2019). Factors Related to Average Concentric Velocity of Four Barbell Exercises at Various Loads. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 33(3), 597-605. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000003043
Fahs CA, Blumkaitis JC, Rossow LM. Factors Related to Average Concentric Velocity of Four Barbell Exercises at Various Loads. J Strength Cond Res. 2019;33(3):597-605. PubMed PMID: 30640305.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Factors Related to Average Concentric Velocity of Four Barbell Exercises at Various Loads. AU - Fahs,Christopher A, AU - Blumkaitis,Julia C, AU - Rossow,Lindy M, PY - 2019/1/15/pubmed PY - 2019/7/31/medline PY - 2019/1/15/entrez SP - 597 EP - 605 JF - Journal of strength and conditioning research JO - J Strength Cond Res VL - 33 IS - 3 N2 - Fahs, CA, Blumkaitis, JC, and Rossow, LM. Factors related to average concentric velocity of four barbell exercises at various loads. J Strength Cond Res 33(3): 597-605, 2019-The resistance exercise load is the primarily determinant of the average concentric velocity (ACV) during a repetition. It is unknown whether individual factors such as training experience or anthropometrics also influence the ACV. Previous research has shown the ACV during the 1 repetition maximum (1RM) varies between exercises, but it is not clear whether ACV is different between exercises at various percentages of the 1RM. This information could provide practical guidelines for trainees using ACV to select training loads. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine whether training age, current training frequency, limb length, height, and relative strength are related to ACV at loads between 35 and 100% of the 1RM for the squat, bench press, deadlift, and overhead press. A secondary purpose was to compare the ACV values between the 4 lifts at each relative load. Fifty-one (18 women and 33 men) completed 2 testing sessions in which the squat, bench press, deadlift, and overhead press ACV were measured during a modified 1RM protocol. Average concentric velocity values were significantly different among the 4 lifts (p < 0.05) at all relative loads between 35 and 100% 1RM except for 55% 1RM (p = 0.112). Generally, compared at the same relative loads, the overhead press exhibited the greatest ACV followed by the squat, bench press, and deadlift (in order). In addition, relative strength level was inversely related to ACV at maximal loads (≥95% 1RM) for the squat, bench press, and deadlift while height was positively related to ACV at moderate loads (55% 1RM) for all lifts (p < 0.05). These results suggest that the load-velocity profile is unique for each of these exercises, and that velocity ranges used for exercise prescription should be specific to the exercise. A trainee's relative strength and height may be a primary influence on the ACV. SN - 1533-4287 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/30640305/Factors_Related_to_Average_Concentric_Velocity_of_Four_Barbell_Exercises_at_Various_Loads_ DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -