Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Enhancing mentoring experiences through e-mentoring: a systematic scoping review of e-mentoring programs between 2000 and 2017.
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2020 03; 25(1):195-226.AH

Abstract

Mentoring is suffering from a shortage of trained mentors which compromise the efficacy of novice mentoring or mentoring between a senior clinician and a junior clinician. E-mentoring is proposed as a means of supplementing this dominant form of mentoring in medicine by providing accessible, timely and longitudinal support for mentees. However, with little is known about e-mentoring nor its role in a blended mentoring approach, a systematic scoping review is proposed to evaluate these gaps in understanding in order to better understand e-mentoring and assess the viability of employing e-mentoring practice to support novice mentoring. Using Arksey and O'Malley's (Int J Soc Res Methodol 8(1):19-32, 2005) approach, 5 reviewers carried out independent literature reviews of e-mentoring as an adjuvant to novice mentoring in PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, ERIC, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Google Scholar, Scopus, GreyLit, OpenGrey, and Web of Science databases. Braun and Clarke's (Qual Res Psychol 3(2):77-101, 2006) thematic analysis approach was used to thematically analyse accounts of e-mentoring across different settings. 6557 abstracts were identified, 109 full text articles were reviewed, and 18 articles were included and thematically analysed. The themes identified include definitions, role, stages, processes, platforms, evaluation, and relationships in e-mentoring. The themes identified provide a clinically relevant definition of e-mentoring, and in highlighting the similarities in the phases of novice and e-mentoring reaffirms the validity of a blended approach as a means of addressing shortfalls in mentoring in medicine.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.Family Medicine Residency, National University Hospital Singapore, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, S119228, Singapore. yingpintoh@gmail.com.Palliative Care Institute Liverpool, Academic Palliative and End of Life Care Centre, University of Liverpool, North West Cancer Research Centre, Liverpool, Merseyside, UK.Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore. Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore. Palliative Care Institute Liverpool, Academic Palliative and End of Life Care Centre, University of Liverpool, North West Cancer Research Centre, Liverpool, Merseyside, UK. Centre for Biomedical Ethics, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore. Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article
Review

Language

eng

PubMed ID

30830505

Citation

Chong, Jia Yan, et al. "Enhancing Mentoring Experiences Through E-mentoring: a Systematic Scoping Review of E-mentoring Programs Between 2000 and 2017." Advances in Health Sciences Education : Theory and Practice, vol. 25, no. 1, 2020, pp. 195-226.
Chong JY, Ching AH, Renganathan Y, et al. Enhancing mentoring experiences through e-mentoring: a systematic scoping review of e-mentoring programs between 2000 and 2017. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2020;25(1):195-226.
Chong, J. Y., Ching, A. H., Renganathan, Y., Lim, W. Q., Toh, Y. P., Mason, S., & Krishna, L. K. R. (2020). Enhancing mentoring experiences through e-mentoring: a systematic scoping review of e-mentoring programs between 2000 and 2017. Advances in Health Sciences Education : Theory and Practice, 25(1), 195-226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-019-09883-8
Chong JY, et al. Enhancing Mentoring Experiences Through E-mentoring: a Systematic Scoping Review of E-mentoring Programs Between 2000 and 2017. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2020;25(1):195-226. PubMed PMID: 30830505.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Enhancing mentoring experiences through e-mentoring: a systematic scoping review of e-mentoring programs between 2000 and 2017. AU - Chong,Jia Yan, AU - Ching,Ann Hui, AU - Renganathan,Yaazhini, AU - Lim,Wei Qiang, AU - Toh,Ying Pin, AU - Mason,Stephen, AU - Krishna,Lalit K R, Y1 - 2019/03/04/ PY - 2018/07/02/received PY - 2019/02/27/accepted PY - 2019/3/5/pubmed PY - 2019/3/5/medline PY - 2019/3/5/entrez KW - Blended mentoring KW - E-mentoring KW - Medical education KW - Mentoring KW - Mentoring framework KW - Mentoring relationship KW - Online mentoring SP - 195 EP - 226 JF - Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice JO - Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract VL - 25 IS - 1 N2 - Mentoring is suffering from a shortage of trained mentors which compromise the efficacy of novice mentoring or mentoring between a senior clinician and a junior clinician. E-mentoring is proposed as a means of supplementing this dominant form of mentoring in medicine by providing accessible, timely and longitudinal support for mentees. However, with little is known about e-mentoring nor its role in a blended mentoring approach, a systematic scoping review is proposed to evaluate these gaps in understanding in order to better understand e-mentoring and assess the viability of employing e-mentoring practice to support novice mentoring. Using Arksey and O'Malley's (Int J Soc Res Methodol 8(1):19-32, 2005) approach, 5 reviewers carried out independent literature reviews of e-mentoring as an adjuvant to novice mentoring in PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, ERIC, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Google Scholar, Scopus, GreyLit, OpenGrey, and Web of Science databases. Braun and Clarke's (Qual Res Psychol 3(2):77-101, 2006) thematic analysis approach was used to thematically analyse accounts of e-mentoring across different settings. 6557 abstracts were identified, 109 full text articles were reviewed, and 18 articles were included and thematically analysed. The themes identified include definitions, role, stages, processes, platforms, evaluation, and relationships in e-mentoring. The themes identified provide a clinically relevant definition of e-mentoring, and in highlighting the similarities in the phases of novice and e-mentoring reaffirms the validity of a blended approach as a means of addressing shortfalls in mentoring in medicine. SN - 1573-1677 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/30830505/Enhancing_mentoring_experiences_through_e_mentoring:_a_systematic_scoping_review_of_e_mentoring_programs_between_2000_and_2017_ L2 - https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-019-09883-8 DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -
Try the Free App:
Prime PubMed app for iOS iPhone iPad
Prime PubMed app for Android
Prime PubMed is provided
free to individuals by:
Unbound Medicine.