Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Classical conditioning in oddball paradigm: A comparison between aversive and name conditioning.
Psychophysiology. 2019 07; 56(7):e13370.P

Abstract

The nature of cortical plasticity in learning is one of the most intriguing questions of modern cognitive neuroscience. Classical conditioning (as a typical case of associative learning) and electroencephalography together provide a good framework for expanding our knowledge about fast learning-related cortical changes. In our experiment, we employed a novel paradigm in which classical conditioning was combined with passive oddball. Nineteen subjects participated in the first experiment (aversive conditioning with painful shock as unconditioned stimulus (US) and neutral tones as conditioned stimulus (CS)), and 22 subjects in the second experiment (with a subject's own name as US). We used event-related potentials (ERPs) and time-frequency analyses to explore the CS-US interaction. We found a learning-induced increment of P3a in the first experiment and the late positive potential (LPP) in both experiments. These effects may be related to increased attentional and emotional significance of conditioned stimuli. We showed that the LPP and P3a effects, earlier found only in visual paradigms, generalize to the auditory sensory system. We also observed suppression of the low beta activity to CS+ in aversive conditioning over the hemisphere contralateral to expected electrical shocks, presumably indicating preparation of the somatosensory system to the expected nociceptive US.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Institute of Medical Psychology and Behavioral Neurobiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany. Department of Psychology, Ural Federal University, Ekaterinburg, Russian Federation.Institute of Medical Psychology and Behavioral Neurobiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

Pub Type(s)

Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Language

eng

PubMed ID

30908691

Citation

Pavlov, Yuri G., and Boris Kotchoubey. "Classical Conditioning in Oddball Paradigm: a Comparison Between Aversive and Name Conditioning." Psychophysiology, vol. 56, no. 7, 2019, pp. e13370.
Pavlov YG, Kotchoubey B. Classical conditioning in oddball paradigm: A comparison between aversive and name conditioning. Psychophysiology. 2019;56(7):e13370.
Pavlov, Y. G., & Kotchoubey, B. (2019). Classical conditioning in oddball paradigm: A comparison between aversive and name conditioning. Psychophysiology, 56(7), e13370. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13370
Pavlov YG, Kotchoubey B. Classical Conditioning in Oddball Paradigm: a Comparison Between Aversive and Name Conditioning. Psychophysiology. 2019;56(7):e13370. PubMed PMID: 30908691.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Classical conditioning in oddball paradigm: A comparison between aversive and name conditioning. AU - Pavlov,Yuri G, AU - Kotchoubey,Boris, Y1 - 2019/03/25/ PY - 2018/06/12/received PY - 2019/02/24/revised PY - 2019/03/02/accepted PY - 2019/3/26/pubmed PY - 2020/4/28/medline PY - 2019/3/26/entrez KW - EEG KW - P300 KW - anxiety KW - fear conditioning KW - late positive potential (LPP) SP - e13370 EP - e13370 JF - Psychophysiology JO - Psychophysiology VL - 56 IS - 7 N2 - The nature of cortical plasticity in learning is one of the most intriguing questions of modern cognitive neuroscience. Classical conditioning (as a typical case of associative learning) and electroencephalography together provide a good framework for expanding our knowledge about fast learning-related cortical changes. In our experiment, we employed a novel paradigm in which classical conditioning was combined with passive oddball. Nineteen subjects participated in the first experiment (aversive conditioning with painful shock as unconditioned stimulus (US) and neutral tones as conditioned stimulus (CS)), and 22 subjects in the second experiment (with a subject's own name as US). We used event-related potentials (ERPs) and time-frequency analyses to explore the CS-US interaction. We found a learning-induced increment of P3a in the first experiment and the late positive potential (LPP) in both experiments. These effects may be related to increased attentional and emotional significance of conditioned stimuli. We showed that the LPP and P3a effects, earlier found only in visual paradigms, generalize to the auditory sensory system. We also observed suppression of the low beta activity to CS+ in aversive conditioning over the hemisphere contralateral to expected electrical shocks, presumably indicating preparation of the somatosensory system to the expected nociceptive US. SN - 1540-5958 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/30908691/Classical_conditioning_in_oddball_paradigm:_A_comparison_between_aversive_and_name_conditioning_ DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -