Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Incorporating ecologically sustainable development policy goals within fisheries management: An assessment of integration and coherence in an Australian context.
J Environ Manage 2019; 249:109230JE

Abstract

Managing fisheries to meet social, economic and ecological objectives is a fundamental problem encountered in fisheries management worldwide. In Australia, fisheries management involves a complex set of national and sub-national policy arrangements, including those designed to deliver against ecologically sustainable development (ESD) objectives. The complex policy framework makes ensuring policy coherence and avoiding unintended consequences difficult, particularly where potential trade-offs are not made explicit. Coherence, or potential policy weakness, of Australian fisheries management in relation to ESD objectives was examined in a subset of Australian wild capture fisheries, at national and jurisdictional scales. Coherent policy frameworks with ESD objectives were found to be more likely at the legislative-level across jurisdictions (horizontal coherence), than other levels of implementation. Many fisheries had problems demonstrating coherence between legislation and management plans due to lack of inclusion of ESD policy themes at management and operational levels. Case studies revealed substantial variation in the likelihood for horizontal and vertical coherence between fisheries policy frameworks managing the same species. The lack of explicit ESD objectives observed in many Australian fisheries suggests a high likelihood of incoherence in fisheries management, or alternatively that managers may be informally persuing higher levels of policy coordination and coherence than can be detected. Lack of detectability of coherence is problematic for demonstrating accountability and transparency in decision-making and public policy. Furthermore, use of discretion by managers when developing management plans, in order to overcome policy weakness, may lead to drifts in individual management direction within a jurisdiction.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Australian National Centre for Ocean Resources and Security, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, 2500, Australia. Electronic address: afarmery@uow.edu.au.Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, 7001, Australia. Electronic address: emily.ogier@utas.edu.au.Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, 7001, Australia. Electronic address: gardner@utas.edu.au.Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, 7001, Australia. Electronic address: jabour@utas.edu.au.

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

31419669

Citation

Farmery, Anna K., et al. "Incorporating Ecologically Sustainable Development Policy Goals Within Fisheries Management: an Assessment of Integration and Coherence in an Australian Context." Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 249, 2019, p. 109230.
Farmery AK, Ogier E, Gardner C, et al. Incorporating ecologically sustainable development policy goals within fisheries management: An assessment of integration and coherence in an Australian context. J Environ Manage. 2019;249:109230.
Farmery, A. K., Ogier, E., Gardner, C., & Jabour, J. (2019). Incorporating ecologically sustainable development policy goals within fisheries management: An assessment of integration and coherence in an Australian context. Journal of Environmental Management, 249, p. 109230. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.07.001.
Farmery AK, et al. Incorporating Ecologically Sustainable Development Policy Goals Within Fisheries Management: an Assessment of Integration and Coherence in an Australian Context. J Environ Manage. 2019 Aug 13;249:109230. PubMed PMID: 31419669.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Incorporating ecologically sustainable development policy goals within fisheries management: An assessment of integration and coherence in an Australian context. AU - Farmery,Anna K, AU - Ogier,Emily, AU - Gardner,Caleb, AU - Jabour,Julia, Y1 - 2019/08/13/ PY - 2019/03/18/received PY - 2019/06/07/revised PY - 2019/07/02/accepted PY - 2019/8/17/pubmed PY - 2019/8/17/medline PY - 2019/8/17/entrez KW - Internal coherence KW - Legislative objectives KW - Policy analysis KW - Public policy KW - Sub-national fisheries management SP - 109230 EP - 109230 JF - Journal of environmental management JO - J. Environ. Manage. VL - 249 N2 - Managing fisheries to meet social, economic and ecological objectives is a fundamental problem encountered in fisheries management worldwide. In Australia, fisheries management involves a complex set of national and sub-national policy arrangements, including those designed to deliver against ecologically sustainable development (ESD) objectives. The complex policy framework makes ensuring policy coherence and avoiding unintended consequences difficult, particularly where potential trade-offs are not made explicit. Coherence, or potential policy weakness, of Australian fisheries management in relation to ESD objectives was examined in a subset of Australian wild capture fisheries, at national and jurisdictional scales. Coherent policy frameworks with ESD objectives were found to be more likely at the legislative-level across jurisdictions (horizontal coherence), than other levels of implementation. Many fisheries had problems demonstrating coherence between legislation and management plans due to lack of inclusion of ESD policy themes at management and operational levels. Case studies revealed substantial variation in the likelihood for horizontal and vertical coherence between fisheries policy frameworks managing the same species. The lack of explicit ESD objectives observed in many Australian fisheries suggests a high likelihood of incoherence in fisheries management, or alternatively that managers may be informally persuing higher levels of policy coordination and coherence than can be detected. Lack of detectability of coherence is problematic for demonstrating accountability and transparency in decision-making and public policy. Furthermore, use of discretion by managers when developing management plans, in order to overcome policy weakness, may lead to drifts in individual management direction within a jurisdiction. SN - 1095-8630 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/31419669/Incorporating_ecologically_sustainable_development_policy_goals_within_fisheries_management:_An_assessment_of_integration_and_coherence_in_an_Australian_context L2 - https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0301-4797(19)30932-6 DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -