Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Understanding decisions to use e-cigarettes or behavioural support to quit tobacco: a qualitative study of current and ex-smokers and stop smoking service staff.
Addiction. 2020 03; 115(3):518-526.A

Abstract

AIM

To examine factors influencing current and ex-smokers' decisions to use e-cigarettes or behavioural support, including potential impacts of any differences in perspectives between smokers and their local stop smoking services (SSSs).

DESIGN

Semi-structured qualitative interviews followed by framework analysis, with the 'capability', 'opportunity', 'motivation' and 'behaviour' (COM-B) model of behaviour change used to frame findings.

SETTING

SSSs and surrounding local areas in England.

PARTICIPANTS

Interviewees (n = 46) were current or recent smokers (n = 29) and SSS staff or stakeholders (n = 17).

MEASUREMENTS

Interview topic guides explored influences on smokers' choice of quit method and characteristics of support offered by local SSSs.

FINDINGS

Current and ex-smokers showed a range of views on potential risks from long-term vaping, which appeared to be particularly relevant for the capability dimension of COM-B. These different attitudes to vaping appeared to be linked to variations in people's perceived capability to assess evidence around e-cigarettes' safety. Motivations for using or avoiding e-cigarettes and SSSs often appeared to overlap: attitudes to both e-cigarettes and nicotine replacement therapy from SSSs often reflected personal experiences and views on whether switching from smoking to these alternatives represented successful quitting or simply ongoing nicotine addiction. For smokers, opportunities to use e-cigarettes or SSSs appeared to be largely determined by perceived time requirements. Furthermore, interviews with SSS professionals suggested that opportunities to access SSSs for ex-smokers who were now regular vapers may be being influenced by different e-cigarette policies adopted in individual areas.

CONCLUSIONS

In England, smokers' decisions to use e-cigarettes and local stop smoking services appear to be determined by varied influences across the COM-B framework. Both smokers and stop smoking service professionals display diverse views about potential risks from e-cigarettes, which has relevance for the provision of behavioural support as well as the uptake of vaping.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Department of Public Health, Environments and Society, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, NIHR School for Public Health Research, London, UK.Department of Public Health, Environments and Society, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, NIHR School for Public Health Research, London, UK.Department of Public Health, Environments and Society, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, NIHR School for Public Health Research, London, UK.

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Language

eng

PubMed ID

31628817

Citation

Hartwell, Greg, et al. "Understanding Decisions to Use E-cigarettes or Behavioural Support to Quit Tobacco: a Qualitative Study of Current and Ex-smokers and Stop Smoking Service Staff." Addiction (Abingdon, England), vol. 115, no. 3, 2020, pp. 518-526.
Hartwell G, Egan M, Petticrew M. Understanding decisions to use e-cigarettes or behavioural support to quit tobacco: a qualitative study of current and ex-smokers and stop smoking service staff. Addiction. 2020;115(3):518-526.
Hartwell, G., Egan, M., & Petticrew, M. (2020). Understanding decisions to use e-cigarettes or behavioural support to quit tobacco: a qualitative study of current and ex-smokers and stop smoking service staff. Addiction (Abingdon, England), 115(3), 518-526. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.14844
Hartwell G, Egan M, Petticrew M. Understanding Decisions to Use E-cigarettes or Behavioural Support to Quit Tobacco: a Qualitative Study of Current and Ex-smokers and Stop Smoking Service Staff. Addiction. 2020;115(3):518-526. PubMed PMID: 31628817.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Understanding decisions to use e-cigarettes or behavioural support to quit tobacco: a qualitative study of current and ex-smokers and stop smoking service staff. AU - Hartwell,Greg, AU - Egan,Matt, AU - Petticrew,Mark, Y1 - 2019/12/11/ PY - 2019/03/27/received PY - 2019/06/28/revised PY - 2019/09/27/accepted PY - 2019/10/20/pubmed PY - 2021/2/20/medline PY - 2019/10/20/entrez KW - Behavioural support KW - COM-B KW - E-cigarettes KW - qualitative KW - smoking KW - stop smoking services SP - 518 EP - 526 JF - Addiction (Abingdon, England) JO - Addiction VL - 115 IS - 3 N2 - AIM: To examine factors influencing current and ex-smokers' decisions to use e-cigarettes or behavioural support, including potential impacts of any differences in perspectives between smokers and their local stop smoking services (SSSs). DESIGN: Semi-structured qualitative interviews followed by framework analysis, with the 'capability', 'opportunity', 'motivation' and 'behaviour' (COM-B) model of behaviour change used to frame findings. SETTING: SSSs and surrounding local areas in England. PARTICIPANTS: Interviewees (n = 46) were current or recent smokers (n = 29) and SSS staff or stakeholders (n = 17). MEASUREMENTS: Interview topic guides explored influences on smokers' choice of quit method and characteristics of support offered by local SSSs. FINDINGS: Current and ex-smokers showed a range of views on potential risks from long-term vaping, which appeared to be particularly relevant for the capability dimension of COM-B. These different attitudes to vaping appeared to be linked to variations in people's perceived capability to assess evidence around e-cigarettes' safety. Motivations for using or avoiding e-cigarettes and SSSs often appeared to overlap: attitudes to both e-cigarettes and nicotine replacement therapy from SSSs often reflected personal experiences and views on whether switching from smoking to these alternatives represented successful quitting or simply ongoing nicotine addiction. For smokers, opportunities to use e-cigarettes or SSSs appeared to be largely determined by perceived time requirements. Furthermore, interviews with SSS professionals suggested that opportunities to access SSSs for ex-smokers who were now regular vapers may be being influenced by different e-cigarette policies adopted in individual areas. CONCLUSIONS: In England, smokers' decisions to use e-cigarettes and local stop smoking services appear to be determined by varied influences across the COM-B framework. Both smokers and stop smoking service professionals display diverse views about potential risks from e-cigarettes, which has relevance for the provision of behavioural support as well as the uptake of vaping. SN - 1360-0443 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/31628817/Understanding_decisions_to_use_e_cigarettes_or_behavioural_support_to_quit_tobacco:_a_qualitative_study_of_current_and_ex_smokers_and_stop_smoking_service_staff_ DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -