Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Outcomes versus intentions in fairness-related decision making: School-aged children's decisions are just like those of adults.
J Exp Child Psychol. 2020 01; 189:104704.JE

Abstract

The notion of what constitutes fairness has been assumed to change during childhood, in line with a marked shift from outcome-based to intention-based moral reasoning. However, the precise developmental profile of such a shift is still subject to debate. This study sought to determine the age at which the perceived intentions of others begin to influence fairness-related decision making in children (aged 6-8 and 9-11 years) and adolescents (aged 14 and 15 years) in the context of the mini-ultimatum game. The mini-ultimatum game has a forced-choice design, whereby a proposer needs to select one of two predetermined offers that a responder can either accept or reject. Due to these constraints, the procedure measures sensitivity to unfair intentions in addition to unfair outcomes. Participants needed to make judgments about how likely they would be to reject various offers, how fair they judged these offers to be, and the emotion they experienced when thinking about the offers. Contrary to previous published reports, we found that even 6- to 8-year-olds employed a sophisticated notion of fairness that took into account the alternatives the proposer had available. Crucially, decision making did not differ as a function of age. A further, and novel, aim was to trace the developmental origins of temporal asymmetries in judgments ab out fairness by testing the implications of adopting a past or future temporal perspective. Across all ages, we found no evidence that fairness-based decision making varies as a function of temporal location.

Authors+Show Affiliations

School of Psychology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast BT7 1NN, UK. Electronic address: a.jaroslawska@qub.ac.uk.School of Psychology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast BT7 1NN, UK.School of Psychology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast BT7 1NN, UK.UCLA Anderson School of Management, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Language

eng

PubMed ID

31634734

Citation

Jaroslawska, Agnieszka J., et al. "Outcomes Versus Intentions in Fairness-related Decision Making: School-aged Children's Decisions Are Just Like Those of Adults." Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, vol. 189, 2020, p. 104704.
Jaroslawska AJ, McCormack T, Burns P, et al. Outcomes versus intentions in fairness-related decision making: School-aged children's decisions are just like those of adults. J Exp Child Psychol. 2020;189:104704.
Jaroslawska, A. J., McCormack, T., Burns, P., & Caruso, E. M. (2020). Outcomes versus intentions in fairness-related decision making: School-aged children's decisions are just like those of adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 189, 104704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2019.104704
Jaroslawska AJ, et al. Outcomes Versus Intentions in Fairness-related Decision Making: School-aged Children's Decisions Are Just Like Those of Adults. J Exp Child Psychol. 2020;189:104704. PubMed PMID: 31634734.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Outcomes versus intentions in fairness-related decision making: School-aged children's decisions are just like those of adults. AU - Jaroslawska,Agnieszka J, AU - McCormack,Teresa, AU - Burns,Patrick, AU - Caruso,Eugene M, Y1 - 2019/10/18/ PY - 2019/01/31/received PY - 2019/08/25/revised PY - 2019/08/26/accepted PY - 2019/10/22/pubmed PY - 2020/12/23/medline PY - 2019/10/22/entrez KW - Decision making KW - Development KW - Fairness KW - Intentionality KW - Temporal asymmetry KW - Time SP - 104704 EP - 104704 JF - Journal of experimental child psychology JO - J Exp Child Psychol VL - 189 N2 - The notion of what constitutes fairness has been assumed to change during childhood, in line with a marked shift from outcome-based to intention-based moral reasoning. However, the precise developmental profile of such a shift is still subject to debate. This study sought to determine the age at which the perceived intentions of others begin to influence fairness-related decision making in children (aged 6-8 and 9-11 years) and adolescents (aged 14 and 15 years) in the context of the mini-ultimatum game. The mini-ultimatum game has a forced-choice design, whereby a proposer needs to select one of two predetermined offers that a responder can either accept or reject. Due to these constraints, the procedure measures sensitivity to unfair intentions in addition to unfair outcomes. Participants needed to make judgments about how likely they would be to reject various offers, how fair they judged these offers to be, and the emotion they experienced when thinking about the offers. Contrary to previous published reports, we found that even 6- to 8-year-olds employed a sophisticated notion of fairness that took into account the alternatives the proposer had available. Crucially, decision making did not differ as a function of age. A further, and novel, aim was to trace the developmental origins of temporal asymmetries in judgments ab out fairness by testing the implications of adopting a past or future temporal perspective. Across all ages, we found no evidence that fairness-based decision making varies as a function of temporal location. SN - 1096-0457 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/31634734/Outcomes_versus_intentions_in_fairness_related_decision_making:_School_aged_children's_decisions_are_just_like_those_of_adults_ L2 - https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0022-0965(19)30059-1 DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -