Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Fear generalization of implicit conditioned facial features - Behavioral and magnetoencephalographic correlates.
Neuroimage. 2020 Jan 15; 205:116302.N

Abstract

Acquired fear responses often generalize from conditioned stimuli (CS) towards perceptually similar, but harmless generalization stimuli (GS). Knowledge on similarities between CS and GS may be explicit or implicit. Employing behavioral measures and whole-head magnetoencephalography, we here investigated the neurocognitive mechanisms underpinning implicit fear generalization. Twenty-nine participants underwent a classical conditioning procedure in which 32 different faces were either paired with an aversive scream (16 CS+) or remained unpaired (16 CS-). CS+ and CS- faces systematically differed from each other regarding their ratio of eye distance and mouth width. High versus low values on this "threat-related feature (TF)" implicitly predicted the presence or absence of the aversive scream. In pre- and post-conditioning phases, all CS and 32 novel GS faces were presented. 16 GS+ ​faces shared the TF of the 16 CS+ ​faces, while 16 ​GS- faces shared the TF of the 16 CS- faces. Behavioral tests confirmed that participants were fully unaware of TF-US contingencies. CS+ ​compared to CS- faces revealed higher unpleasantness, arousal and US-expectancy ratings. A generalization of these behavioral fear responses to GS+ ​compared to GS- faces was observed by trend only. Source-estimations of event-related fields showed stronger neural responses to both CS+ and GS+ ​compared to CS- and GS- in anterior temporal (<100 ​ms) and temporo-occipital (<150 ​ms; 553-587 ​ms) ventral brain regions. Reverse effects were found in dorsal frontal areas (<100 ​ms; 173-203 ​ms; 257-290 ​ms). Neural data also revealed selectively enhanced responses to CS+ ​but not GS+ ​stimuli in occipital regions (110-167 ​ms; 330-413 ​ms), indicating perceptual discrimination. Our data suggest that the prioritized perceptual analysis of threat-associated conditioned faces in ventral networks rapidly generalizes to novel faces sharing threat-related features. This generalization process occurs in absence of contingency awareness and may thus contribute to implicit attentional biases. The coexisting perceptual discrimination suggests that fear generalization is not a mere consequence of insufficient stimulus discrimination but rather an active, integrative process.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Institute for Biomagnetism and Biosignalanalysis, University of Münster, Malmedyweg 15, D-48149, Münster, Germany; Otto Creutzfeldt Center for Cognitive and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Münster, D-48149, Münster, Germany. Electronic address: k.roesmann@uni-muenster.de.Institute for Biomagnetism and Biosignalanalysis, University of Münster, Malmedyweg 15, D-48149, Münster, Germany.Institute for Biomagnetism and Biosignalanalysis, University of Münster, Malmedyweg 15, D-48149, Münster, Germany; Otto Creutzfeldt Center for Cognitive and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Münster, D-48149, Münster, Germany.Institute for Biomagnetism and Biosignalanalysis, University of Münster, Malmedyweg 15, D-48149, Münster, Germany; Otto Creutzfeldt Center for Cognitive and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Münster, D-48149, Münster, Germany.Institute for Biomagnetism and Biosignalanalysis, University of Münster, Malmedyweg 15, D-48149, Münster, Germany; Otto Creutzfeldt Center for Cognitive and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Münster, D-48149, Münster, Germany; Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University of Münster, Schmeddingstr. 50, D-48149, Münster, Germany.Institute for Biomagnetism and Biosignalanalysis, University of Münster, Malmedyweg 15, D-48149, Münster, Germany; Otto Creutzfeldt Center for Cognitive and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Münster, D-48149, Münster, Germany.

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Language

eng

PubMed ID

31639511

Citation

Roesmann, Kati, et al. "Fear Generalization of Implicit Conditioned Facial Features - Behavioral and Magnetoencephalographic Correlates." NeuroImage, vol. 205, 2020, p. 116302.
Roesmann K, Wiens N, Winker C, et al. Fear generalization of implicit conditioned facial features - Behavioral and magnetoencephalographic correlates. Neuroimage. 2020;205:116302.
Roesmann, K., Wiens, N., Winker, C., Rehbein, M. A., Wessing, I., & Junghoefer, M. (2020). Fear generalization of implicit conditioned facial features - Behavioral and magnetoencephalographic correlates. NeuroImage, 205, 116302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116302
Roesmann K, et al. Fear Generalization of Implicit Conditioned Facial Features - Behavioral and Magnetoencephalographic Correlates. Neuroimage. 2020 Jan 15;205:116302. PubMed PMID: 31639511.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Fear generalization of implicit conditioned facial features - Behavioral and magnetoencephalographic correlates. AU - Roesmann,Kati, AU - Wiens,Nele, AU - Winker,Constantin, AU - Rehbein,Maimu Alissa, AU - Wessing,Ida, AU - Junghoefer,Markus, Y1 - 2019/10/19/ PY - 2019/3/28/received PY - 2019/9/19/revised PY - 2019/10/17/accepted PY - 2019/10/23/pubmed PY - 2020/12/19/medline PY - 2019/10/23/entrez KW - Contingency awareness KW - EEG KW - Fear conditioning KW - Fear generalization KW - MEG KW - Motivated attention SP - 116302 EP - 116302 JF - NeuroImage JO - Neuroimage VL - 205 N2 - Acquired fear responses often generalize from conditioned stimuli (CS) towards perceptually similar, but harmless generalization stimuli (GS). Knowledge on similarities between CS and GS may be explicit or implicit. Employing behavioral measures and whole-head magnetoencephalography, we here investigated the neurocognitive mechanisms underpinning implicit fear generalization. Twenty-nine participants underwent a classical conditioning procedure in which 32 different faces were either paired with an aversive scream (16 CS+) or remained unpaired (16 CS-). CS+ and CS- faces systematically differed from each other regarding their ratio of eye distance and mouth width. High versus low values on this "threat-related feature (TF)" implicitly predicted the presence or absence of the aversive scream. In pre- and post-conditioning phases, all CS and 32 novel GS faces were presented. 16 GS+ ​faces shared the TF of the 16 CS+ ​faces, while 16 ​GS- faces shared the TF of the 16 CS- faces. Behavioral tests confirmed that participants were fully unaware of TF-US contingencies. CS+ ​compared to CS- faces revealed higher unpleasantness, arousal and US-expectancy ratings. A generalization of these behavioral fear responses to GS+ ​compared to GS- faces was observed by trend only. Source-estimations of event-related fields showed stronger neural responses to both CS+ and GS+ ​compared to CS- and GS- in anterior temporal (<100 ​ms) and temporo-occipital (<150 ​ms; 553-587 ​ms) ventral brain regions. Reverse effects were found in dorsal frontal areas (<100 ​ms; 173-203 ​ms; 257-290 ​ms). Neural data also revealed selectively enhanced responses to CS+ ​but not GS+ ​stimuli in occipital regions (110-167 ​ms; 330-413 ​ms), indicating perceptual discrimination. Our data suggest that the prioritized perceptual analysis of threat-associated conditioned faces in ventral networks rapidly generalizes to novel faces sharing threat-related features. This generalization process occurs in absence of contingency awareness and may thus contribute to implicit attentional biases. The coexisting perceptual discrimination suggests that fear generalization is not a mere consequence of insufficient stimulus discrimination but rather an active, integrative process. SN - 1095-9572 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/31639511/Fear_generalization_of_implicit_conditioned_facial_features___Behavioral_and_magnetoencephalographic_correlates_ DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -