Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Midstream Clean-Catch Urine Culture Obtained by Stimulation Technique versus Catheter Specimen Urine Culture for Urinary Tract Infections in Newborns: A Paired Comparison of Urine Collection Methods.
Med Princ Pract. 2020; 29(4):326-331.MP

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The group of Herreros Fernández developed a new, safe, quick, and successful technique for collecting midstream clean-catch urine(MS-CCU) in newborns based on bladder stimulation and lumbar paravertebral massage maneuvers. The purpose of this study was to compare the contamination rates of catheter specimen urine (CSU) and MS-CCU by a lumbar/sacral stimulation technique in newborns.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Full-term newborns ranging in age from 2 to 28 days who needed an investigation for a presumed urinary tract infection (UTI) were included in the study. Two samples, MS-CCU by lumbar/sacral stimulation technique and CSU, were collected consecutively for each patient. Suitable samples were obtained from 90 patients.

RESULTS

The contamination rate in MS-CCU cultures (n = 24/90, 26.66%) was higher than in CSU cultures (n = 9/90, 10%), and the difference was statistically significant (p = 0.039). Thirteen patients had UTI according to both samples (14.14%). In urine analysis, while there was no statistically significant difference in bacteriuria (p = 0.61) and nitrite positivity (p = 0.14) between patients with and without UTI, pyuria (p = 0.01) and leukocyte esterase positivity (p = 0.01) were higher in patients with UTI, and the difference was statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

The contamination rate in MS-CCU cultures was two and a half times greater than in the CSU culture samples. Thus, MS-CCU cannot replace the catheter for the diagnosis of UTI.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey, nilgunaltuntas@hotmail.com.Department of Pediatrics, Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey.

Pub Type(s)

Comparative Study
Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

31665720

Citation

Altuntas, Nilgun, and Basak Alan. "Midstream Clean-Catch Urine Culture Obtained By Stimulation Technique Versus Catheter Specimen Urine Culture for Urinary Tract Infections in Newborns: a Paired Comparison of Urine Collection Methods." Medical Principles and Practice : International Journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre, vol. 29, no. 4, 2020, pp. 326-331.
Altuntas N, Alan B. Midstream Clean-Catch Urine Culture Obtained by Stimulation Technique versus Catheter Specimen Urine Culture for Urinary Tract Infections in Newborns: A Paired Comparison of Urine Collection Methods. Med Princ Pract. 2020;29(4):326-331.
Altuntas, N., & Alan, B. (2020). Midstream Clean-Catch Urine Culture Obtained by Stimulation Technique versus Catheter Specimen Urine Culture for Urinary Tract Infections in Newborns: A Paired Comparison of Urine Collection Methods. Medical Principles and Practice : International Journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre, 29(4), 326-331. https://doi.org/10.1159/000504443
Altuntas N, Alan B. Midstream Clean-Catch Urine Culture Obtained By Stimulation Technique Versus Catheter Specimen Urine Culture for Urinary Tract Infections in Newborns: a Paired Comparison of Urine Collection Methods. Med Princ Pract. 2020;29(4):326-331. PubMed PMID: 31665720.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Midstream Clean-Catch Urine Culture Obtained by Stimulation Technique versus Catheter Specimen Urine Culture for Urinary Tract Infections in Newborns: A Paired Comparison of Urine Collection Methods. AU - Altuntas,Nilgun, AU - Alan,Basak, Y1 - 2019/10/31/ PY - 2019/05/29/received PY - 2019/10/30/accepted PY - 2019/10/31/pubmed PY - 2021/7/17/medline PY - 2019/10/31/entrez KW - Catheter specimen urine KW - Midstream clean-catch urine KW - Newborn KW - Urinary tract infection SP - 326 EP - 331 JF - Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre JO - Med Princ Pract VL - 29 IS - 4 N2 - OBJECTIVE: The group of Herreros Fernández developed a new, safe, quick, and successful technique for collecting midstream clean-catch urine(MS-CCU) in newborns based on bladder stimulation and lumbar paravertebral massage maneuvers. The purpose of this study was to compare the contamination rates of catheter specimen urine (CSU) and MS-CCU by a lumbar/sacral stimulation technique in newborns. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Full-term newborns ranging in age from 2 to 28 days who needed an investigation for a presumed urinary tract infection (UTI) were included in the study. Two samples, MS-CCU by lumbar/sacral stimulation technique and CSU, were collected consecutively for each patient. Suitable samples were obtained from 90 patients. RESULTS: The contamination rate in MS-CCU cultures (n = 24/90, 26.66%) was higher than in CSU cultures (n = 9/90, 10%), and the difference was statistically significant (p = 0.039). Thirteen patients had UTI according to both samples (14.14%). In urine analysis, while there was no statistically significant difference in bacteriuria (p = 0.61) and nitrite positivity (p = 0.14) between patients with and without UTI, pyuria (p = 0.01) and leukocyte esterase positivity (p = 0.01) were higher in patients with UTI, and the difference was statistically significant. CONCLUSION: The contamination rate in MS-CCU cultures was two and a half times greater than in the CSU culture samples. Thus, MS-CCU cannot replace the catheter for the diagnosis of UTI. SN - 1423-0151 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/31665720/Midstream_Clean_Catch_Urine_Culture_Obtained_by_Stimulation_Technique_versus_Catheter_Specimen_Urine_Culture_for_Urinary_Tract_Infections_in_Newborns:_A_Paired_Comparison_of_Urine_Collection_Methods_ DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -