Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

RETRACTED ARTICLE

Reliability and Validity of Using the Push Band v2.0 to Measure Repetition Velocity in Free-Weight and Smith Machine Exercises.
J Strength Cond Res. 2019 12 19 [Online ahead of print]JS

Abstract

Hughes, LJ, Peiffer, JJ, and Scott, BR. Reliability and validity of using the Push Band v2.0 to measure repetition velocity in free-weight and Smith machine exercises. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2019-The purpose of this study was to investigate the test-retest reliability and concurrent validity of using the Push Band device 2.0 (PUSH) to quantify repetition velocity across 4 common resistance training exercises performed using free-weight and Smith machine training modalities. Twenty well-trained men (age: 25.1 ± 2.9 years, height: 182.4 ± 6.0 cm, body mass: 77.9 ± 12.0 kg, training age: 5.2 ± 1.4 years) visited the laboratory on 6 occasions (3 free-weight and 3 Smith machine sessions). Baseline strength assessments were conducted in the first session with each modality for squat, bench press, overhead press, and prone row exercises. The subsequent sessions featured repetitions performed with 30, 60, and 90% 1-repetition maximum. During these sessions, velocity was measured simultaneously using a validated linear position transducer (LPT; considered the criterion for this study) and 2 PUSH devices, one in body mode (PUSHBODY) and the other bar mode (PUSHBAR). Test-retest reliability was examined using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and coefficient of variation (CV). The LPT demonstrated slightly greater reliability (ICC = 0.80-0.98, CV = 0.4-5.1%) than the PUSHBODY (ICC = 0.65-0.95, CV = 0.8-6.9%) and PUSHBAR (ICC = 0.50-0.93, CV = 0.7-7.1%) devices. Near-perfect correlations existed between velocity measured using LPT and PUSH devices (r = 0.96-0.99). No significant differences existed between mean velocity measures obtained using LPT and either PUSH device. The PUSH device can be used in either bar or body mode to obtain reliable and valid repetition velocity measures across a range of loads and exercises performed using either free weights or a Smith machine.

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article
Retracted Publication

Language

eng

PubMed ID

31860535

Citation

"Reliability and Validity of Using the Push Band V2.0 to Measure Repetition Velocity in Free-Weight and Smith Machine Exercises." Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 2019, pp. 365-370.
Reliability and Validity of Using the Push Band v2.0 to Measure Repetition Velocity in Free-Weight and Smith Machine Exercises. J Strength Cond Res. 2019.
(2019). Reliability and Validity of Using the Push Band v2.0 to Measure Repetition Velocity in Free-Weight and Smith Machine Exercises. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 365-370. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000003436
Reliability and Validity of Using the Push Band V2.0 to Measure Repetition Velocity in Free-Weight and Smith Machine Exercises. J Strength Cond Res. 2019 12 19;365-370. PubMed PMID: 31860535.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Reliability and Validity of Using the Push Band v2.0 to Measure Repetition Velocity in Free-Weight and Smith Machine Exercises. Y1 - 2019/12/19/ PY - 2019/12/21/entrez PY - 2019/12/21/pubmed PY - 2019/12/21/medline SP - 365 EP - 370 JF - Journal of strength and conditioning research JO - J Strength Cond Res N2 - Hughes, LJ, Peiffer, JJ, and Scott, BR. Reliability and validity of using the Push Band v2.0 to measure repetition velocity in free-weight and Smith machine exercises. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2019-The purpose of this study was to investigate the test-retest reliability and concurrent validity of using the Push Band device 2.0 (PUSH) to quantify repetition velocity across 4 common resistance training exercises performed using free-weight and Smith machine training modalities. Twenty well-trained men (age: 25.1 ± 2.9 years, height: 182.4 ± 6.0 cm, body mass: 77.9 ± 12.0 kg, training age: 5.2 ± 1.4 years) visited the laboratory on 6 occasions (3 free-weight and 3 Smith machine sessions). Baseline strength assessments were conducted in the first session with each modality for squat, bench press, overhead press, and prone row exercises. The subsequent sessions featured repetitions performed with 30, 60, and 90% 1-repetition maximum. During these sessions, velocity was measured simultaneously using a validated linear position transducer (LPT; considered the criterion for this study) and 2 PUSH devices, one in body mode (PUSHBODY) and the other bar mode (PUSHBAR). Test-retest reliability was examined using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and coefficient of variation (CV). The LPT demonstrated slightly greater reliability (ICC = 0.80-0.98, CV = 0.4-5.1%) than the PUSHBODY (ICC = 0.65-0.95, CV = 0.8-6.9%) and PUSHBAR (ICC = 0.50-0.93, CV = 0.7-7.1%) devices. Near-perfect correlations existed between velocity measured using LPT and PUSH devices (r = 0.96-0.99). No significant differences existed between mean velocity measures obtained using LPT and either PUSH device. The PUSH device can be used in either bar or body mode to obtain reliable and valid repetition velocity measures across a range of loads and exercises performed using either free weights or a Smith machine. SN - 1533-4287 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/31860535/Reliability_and_Validity_of_Using_the_Push_Band_v2_0_to_Measure_Repetition_Velocity_in_Free_Weight_and_Smith_Machine_Exercises_ DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -
Try the Free App:
Prime PubMed app for iOS iPhone iPad
Prime PubMed app for Android
Prime PubMed is provided
free to individuals by:
Unbound Medicine.