Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Risk Markers for Physical Teen Dating Violence Victimization in the United States: A Meta-Analysis.
J Youth Adolesc. 2020 Mar; 49(3):575-589.JY

Abstract

Teen dating violence is a serious health concern in the United States. The goal of this study was to synthesize the current knowledge of risk markers for physical teen dating violence victimization through the use of a meta-analysis. A total of 50 studies, yielding 221 unique effect sizes, met the inclusion criteria for the analysis. Using Dutton's nested ecological model as a framework, a total of 29 risk markers for physical teen dating violence victimization were examined. There were enough effect sizes found to be able to examine 18 risk markers in the ontogenetic system, nine risk markers in the microsystem, and two risk markers in the exosystem. The results indicated that the strongest risk markers located in the ontogenetic system were substance use, risky sexual behaviors, having carried a weapon, suicide attempts, and disordered eating. The strongest risk markers found in the adolescents' microsystem were related to other forms of teen dating violence perpetration and victimization (i.e., physical dating violence perpetration, sexual dating violence victimization, emotional dating violence victimization). The two risk markers found in the exosystem (neighborhood disorganization and low socioeconomic status) were significant but small in magnitude. This study also compared the strength of 10 risk markers for teen dating violence victimization between male and female adolescents and did not find any significant differences related to gender. Examining which risk markers for physical teen dating violence are the strongest in magnitude can highlight various markers that might help identify adolescents who are being victimized in their romantic relationships and need additional resources.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA. cspencer@ksu.edu.Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA.Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA.Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA.

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article
Meta-Analysis

Language

eng

PubMed ID

31974737

Citation

Spencer, Chelsea M., et al. "Risk Markers for Physical Teen Dating Violence Victimization in the United States: a Meta-Analysis." Journal of Youth and Adolescence, vol. 49, no. 3, 2020, pp. 575-589.
Spencer CM, Anders KM, Toews ML, et al. Risk Markers for Physical Teen Dating Violence Victimization in the United States: A Meta-Analysis. J Youth Adolesc. 2020;49(3):575-589.
Spencer, C. M., Anders, K. M., Toews, M. L., & Emanuels, S. K. (2020). Risk Markers for Physical Teen Dating Violence Victimization in the United States: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 49(3), 575-589. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-020-01194-1
Spencer CM, et al. Risk Markers for Physical Teen Dating Violence Victimization in the United States: a Meta-Analysis. J Youth Adolesc. 2020;49(3):575-589. PubMed PMID: 31974737.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Risk Markers for Physical Teen Dating Violence Victimization in the United States: A Meta-Analysis. AU - Spencer,Chelsea M, AU - Anders,Kristin M, AU - Toews,Michelle L, AU - Emanuels,Sarah K, Y1 - 2020/01/23/ PY - 2019/11/11/received PY - 2020/01/11/accepted PY - 2020/1/25/pubmed PY - 2020/9/20/medline PY - 2020/1/25/entrez KW - Meta-analysis KW - Risk markers KW - Teen dating violence KW - Victimization SP - 575 EP - 589 JF - Journal of youth and adolescence JO - J Youth Adolesc VL - 49 IS - 3 N2 - Teen dating violence is a serious health concern in the United States. The goal of this study was to synthesize the current knowledge of risk markers for physical teen dating violence victimization through the use of a meta-analysis. A total of 50 studies, yielding 221 unique effect sizes, met the inclusion criteria for the analysis. Using Dutton's nested ecological model as a framework, a total of 29 risk markers for physical teen dating violence victimization were examined. There were enough effect sizes found to be able to examine 18 risk markers in the ontogenetic system, nine risk markers in the microsystem, and two risk markers in the exosystem. The results indicated that the strongest risk markers located in the ontogenetic system were substance use, risky sexual behaviors, having carried a weapon, suicide attempts, and disordered eating. The strongest risk markers found in the adolescents' microsystem were related to other forms of teen dating violence perpetration and victimization (i.e., physical dating violence perpetration, sexual dating violence victimization, emotional dating violence victimization). The two risk markers found in the exosystem (neighborhood disorganization and low socioeconomic status) were significant but small in magnitude. This study also compared the strength of 10 risk markers for teen dating violence victimization between male and female adolescents and did not find any significant differences related to gender. Examining which risk markers for physical teen dating violence are the strongest in magnitude can highlight various markers that might help identify adolescents who are being victimized in their romantic relationships and need additional resources. SN - 1573-6601 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/31974737/Risk_Markers_for_Physical_Teen_Dating_Violence_Victimization_in_the_United_States:_A_Meta_Analysis_ L2 - https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10964-020-01194-1 DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -