Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Outcome expectancy and suboptimal risky choice in nonhuman primates.
Learn Behav. 2020 09; 48(3):301-321.LB

Abstract

Animals will favor a risky option when a stimulus signaling reward bridges the choice and the outcome. The present experiments investigated signal-induced risky choices and reward-outcome expectations in rhesus and capuchin monkeys. Risky choice was assessed by preference for a large-probabilistic reward over a modest-certain reward. Outcome expectancy was assessed by providing a truncation-response to shorten the delay period. In Experiment 1 both species generally favored the risky option compared to a safe option when the outcomes were signaled and generally shortened the delays except when a signaled-loss stimulus was presented. The use of the delay-truncation response suggested that the monkeys were sensitive to the information conveyed by the stimulus. Experiments 2 and 3 were designed to investigate whether the delay-truncation response used by capuchin monkeys was strategically used reflecting explicit decision-making versus a conditioned response to reward stimuli. A perceptual judgment task was included and the selective use of the delay-truncation response on unsignaled correct trials may suggest the involvement of metacognitive processes. The capuchin monkeys generally truncated the delays except under conditions where reward would not be expected (risky-loss or incorrect-judgment). When the outcomes were unsignaled during the delay some capuchin monkeys were less likely to truncate the delay following an incorrect task response. Overall, the monkeys: (1) made more risky choices when the outcomes were signaled - consistent with gambling-like behavior. (2) selectively truncated the unsignaled delays when rewards could be anticipated (even when metacognitive-like awareness guided anticipation) - suggesting that delay truncation responses reflect explicit outcome expectancy.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Department of Psychological Sciences, Kansas State University, 492 Bluemont Hall, 1114 Mid-Campus Dr North, Manhattan, KS, 66506-5302, USA. smith.travis.r@gmail.com.Language Research Center and Department of Psychology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

Language

eng

PubMed ID

31997252

Citation

Smith, Travis R., and Michael J. Beran. "Outcome Expectancy and Suboptimal Risky Choice in Nonhuman Primates." Learning & Behavior, vol. 48, no. 3, 2020, pp. 301-321.
Smith TR, Beran MJ. Outcome expectancy and suboptimal risky choice in nonhuman primates. Learn Behav. 2020;48(3):301-321.
Smith, T. R., & Beran, M. J. (2020). Outcome expectancy and suboptimal risky choice in nonhuman primates. Learning & Behavior, 48(3), 301-321. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13420-019-00406-4
Smith TR, Beran MJ. Outcome Expectancy and Suboptimal Risky Choice in Nonhuman Primates. Learn Behav. 2020;48(3):301-321. PubMed PMID: 31997252.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Outcome expectancy and suboptimal risky choice in nonhuman primates. AU - Smith,Travis R, AU - Beran,Michael J, PY - 2020/1/31/pubmed PY - 2020/11/21/medline PY - 2020/1/31/entrez KW - Capuchin monkeys KW - Gambling KW - Metacognition KW - Rhesus monkeys KW - Risk preference KW - Signaled reinforcement SP - 301 EP - 321 JF - Learning & behavior JO - Learn Behav VL - 48 IS - 3 N2 - Animals will favor a risky option when a stimulus signaling reward bridges the choice and the outcome. The present experiments investigated signal-induced risky choices and reward-outcome expectations in rhesus and capuchin monkeys. Risky choice was assessed by preference for a large-probabilistic reward over a modest-certain reward. Outcome expectancy was assessed by providing a truncation-response to shorten the delay period. In Experiment 1 both species generally favored the risky option compared to a safe option when the outcomes were signaled and generally shortened the delays except when a signaled-loss stimulus was presented. The use of the delay-truncation response suggested that the monkeys were sensitive to the information conveyed by the stimulus. Experiments 2 and 3 were designed to investigate whether the delay-truncation response used by capuchin monkeys was strategically used reflecting explicit decision-making versus a conditioned response to reward stimuli. A perceptual judgment task was included and the selective use of the delay-truncation response on unsignaled correct trials may suggest the involvement of metacognitive processes. The capuchin monkeys generally truncated the delays except under conditions where reward would not be expected (risky-loss or incorrect-judgment). When the outcomes were unsignaled during the delay some capuchin monkeys were less likely to truncate the delay following an incorrect task response. Overall, the monkeys: (1) made more risky choices when the outcomes were signaled - consistent with gambling-like behavior. (2) selectively truncated the unsignaled delays when rewards could be anticipated (even when metacognitive-like awareness guided anticipation) - suggesting that delay truncation responses reflect explicit outcome expectancy. SN - 1543-4508 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/31997252/Outcome_expectancy_and_suboptimal_risky_choice_in_nonhuman_primates_ DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -
Try the Free App:
Prime PubMed app for iOS iPhone iPad
Prime PubMed app for Android
Prime PubMed is provided
free to individuals by:
Unbound Medicine.