Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Coronavirus: why a permanent ban on wildlife trade might not work in China.
Nature. 2020 02; 578(7794):217.Nat

Authors

No affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Letter

Language

eng

PubMed ID

32047312

Citation

Ribeiro, Joana, et al. "Coronavirus: Why a Permanent Ban On Wildlife Trade Might Not Work in China." Nature, vol. 578, no. 7794, 2020, p. 217.
Ribeiro J, Bingre P, Strubbe D, et al. Coronavirus: why a permanent ban on wildlife trade might not work in China. Nature. 2020;578(7794):217.
Ribeiro, J., Bingre, P., Strubbe, D., & Reino, L. (2020). Coronavirus: why a permanent ban on wildlife trade might not work in China. Nature, 578(7794), 217. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-00377-x
Ribeiro J, et al. Coronavirus: Why a Permanent Ban On Wildlife Trade Might Not Work in China. Nature. 2020;578(7794):217. PubMed PMID: 32047312.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Coronavirus: why a permanent ban on wildlife trade might not work in China. AU - Ribeiro,Joana, AU - Bingre,Pedro, AU - Strubbe,Diederik, AU - Reino,Luís, PY - 2020/2/13/entrez PY - 2020/2/13/pubmed PY - 2020/4/21/medline KW - Diseases KW - Society SP - 217 EP - 217 JF - Nature JO - Nature VL - 578 IS - 7794 SN - 1476-4687 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/32047312/Coronavirus:_why_a_permanent_ban_on_wildlife_trade_might_not_work_in_China_ L2 - https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-00377-x DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -