TY - JOUR T1 - Measurement Approaches to Partnership Success: Theory and Methods for Measuring Success in Long-Standing Community-Based Participatory Research Partnerships. AU - Israel,Barbara A, AU - Lachance,Laurie, AU - Coombe,Chris M, AU - Lee,Shoou-Yih D, AU - Jensen,Megan, AU - Wilson-Powers,Eliza, AU - Mentz,Graciela, AU - Muhammad,Michael, AU - Rowe,Zachary, AU - Reyes,Angela G, AU - Brush,Barbara L, PY - 2020/4/14/entrez PY - 2020/4/14/pubmed PY - 2021/2/3/medline SP - 129 EP - 140 JF - Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action JO - Prog Community Health Partnersh VL - 14 IS - 1 N2 - BACKGROUND: Numerous conceptual frameworks have been developed to understand how community-based participatory research (CBPR) partnerships function, and multiple measurement approaches have been designed to evaluate them. However, most measures are not validated, and have focused on new partnerships. To define and assess the meaning of success in long-standing CBPR partnerships, we are conducting a CBPR study, Measurement Approaches to Partnership Success (MAPS). In this article we describe the theoretical underpinnings and methodological approaches used. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study are to 1) develop a questionnaire to evaluate success in long-standing CBPR partnerships, 2) test the psychometric qualities of the questionnaire, 3) assess the relationships between key variables and refine the questionnaire and theoretical model, and 4) develop mechanisms and a feedback tool to apply partnership evaluation findings. METHODS: Methodological approaches have included: engaged a community-academic national Expert Panel; conducted key informant interviews with Expert Panel; conducted a scoping literature review; conducted a Delphi process with the Expert Panel; and revised the measurement instrument. Additional methods include: conduct cognitive interviews and pilot testing; revise and test final version of the questionnaire with long-standing CBPR partnerships; examine the reliability and validity; analyze the relationship among variables in the framework; revise the framework; and develop a feedback mechanism for sharing partnership evaluation results. CONCLUSIONS: Through the application of a theoretical model and multiple methodological approaches, the MAPS study will result in a validated measurement instrument and will develop procedures for effectively feeding back evaluation findings in order to strengthen authentic partnerships to achieve health equity. SN - 1557-055X UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/32280130/Measurement_Approaches_to_Partnership_Success:_Theory_and_Methods_for_Measuring_Success_in_Long_Standing_Community_Based_Participatory_Research_Partnerships_ DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -