Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Velocity Performance Feedback During the Free-Weight Bench Press Testing Procedure: An Effective Strategy to Increase the Reliability and One Repetition Maximum Accuracy Prediction.
J Strength Cond Res. 2022 Apr 01; 36(4):1077-1083.JS

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Jiménez-Alonso, A, García-Ramos, A, Cepero, M, Miras-Moreno, S, Rojas, FJ, and Pérez-Castilla, A. Velocity performance feedback during the free-weight bench press testing procedure: An effective strategy to increase the reliability and one repetition maximum accuracy prediction. J Strength Cond Res 36(4): 1077-1083, 2022-This study aimed to determine whether the verbal provision of velocity performance feedback during the free-weight bench press (BP) exercise influences (a) the within-session reliability and magnitude of mean concentric velocity (MCV) values recorded against a range of submaximal loads and (b) the accuracy of the individualized load-velocity profile to estimate the BP 1 repetition maximum (1RM). Fifteen men (BP 1RM relative to body mass = 1.08 ± 0.22) performed an incremental loading test until reaching the 1RM on 2 separate sessions. Subjects received verbal velocity performance feedback in 1 session (knowledge of results [KR]), and no KR was provided in another session (Control). A linear velocity transducer was used to collect the MCV against 4 loads (40-55-70-85% 1RM), and the BP 1RM was estimated from the individualized load-velocity relationship modeled through the multiple-point (40-55-70-85% 1RM) and 2-point methods (40-85% 1RM). The KR condition provided a higher reliability (coefficient of variation [CV]: KR = 2.41%, Control = 3.54%; CV ratio = 1.47) and magnitude (p = 0.001; effect size [ES] = 0.78) of MCV for the 40% 1RM, but no significant differences in reliability (CV ratio ≤1.15) nor in the magnitude (p ≥ 0.058; ES range = 0.00-0.32) were observed for higher loads. The accuracy in the estimation of the 1RM was higher for the KR (absolute errors: multiple-point = 3.1 ± 2.3 kg; 2-point = 3.5 ± 2.1 kg) compared with the Control condition (absolute errors: 4.1 ± 1.9 kg for both multiple-point and 2-point methods). These results encourage the provision of verbal velocity performance feedback during BP testing procedures.

Links

Publisher Full Text (DOI)

Authors+Show Affiliations

Jiménez-Alonso A
Department of Teaching Body Language, Faculty of Educational Sciences, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
García-Ramos A
Department of Sports Sciences and Physical Conditioning, Faculty of Education, Catholic University of the Most Holy Conception, Concepción, Chile; and. Department of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Cepero M
Department of Teaching Body Language, Faculty of Educational Sciences, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Miras-Moreno S
Department of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Rojas FJ
Department of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Pérez-Castilla A
Department of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.

MeSH

FeedbackHumansMaleMuscle StrengthReproducibility of ResultsResistance TrainingWeight Lifting

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

32282530

Citation

Jiménez-Alonso, Ainara, et al. "Velocity Performance Feedback During the Free-Weight Bench Press Testing Procedure: an Effective Strategy to Increase the Reliability and One Repetition Maximum Accuracy Prediction." Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, vol. 36, no. 4, 2022, pp. 1077-1083.
Jiménez-Alonso A, García-Ramos A, Cepero M, et al. Velocity Performance Feedback During the Free-Weight Bench Press Testing Procedure: An Effective Strategy to Increase the Reliability and One Repetition Maximum Accuracy Prediction. J Strength Cond Res. 2022;36(4):1077-1083.
Jiménez-Alonso, A., García-Ramos, A., Cepero, M., Miras-Moreno, S., Rojas, F. J., & Pérez-Castilla, A. (2022). Velocity Performance Feedback During the Free-Weight Bench Press Testing Procedure: An Effective Strategy to Increase the Reliability and One Repetition Maximum Accuracy Prediction. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 36(4), 1077-1083. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000003609
Jiménez-Alonso A, et al. Velocity Performance Feedback During the Free-Weight Bench Press Testing Procedure: an Effective Strategy to Increase the Reliability and One Repetition Maximum Accuracy Prediction. J Strength Cond Res. 2022 Apr 1;36(4):1077-1083. PubMed PMID: 32282530.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Velocity Performance Feedback During the Free-Weight Bench Press Testing Procedure: An Effective Strategy to Increase the Reliability and One Repetition Maximum Accuracy Prediction. AU - Jiménez-Alonso,Ainara, AU - García-Ramos,Amador, AU - Cepero,Mar, AU - Miras-Moreno,Sergio, AU - Rojas,Francisco Javier, AU - Pérez-Castilla,Alejandro, PY - 2020/4/14/pubmed PY - 2022/3/25/medline PY - 2020/4/14/entrez SP - 1077 EP - 1083 JF - Journal of strength and conditioning research JO - J Strength Cond Res VL - 36 IS - 4 N2 - ABSTRACT: Jiménez-Alonso, A, García-Ramos, A, Cepero, M, Miras-Moreno, S, Rojas, FJ, and Pérez-Castilla, A. Velocity performance feedback during the free-weight bench press testing procedure: An effective strategy to increase the reliability and one repetition maximum accuracy prediction. J Strength Cond Res 36(4): 1077-1083, 2022-This study aimed to determine whether the verbal provision of velocity performance feedback during the free-weight bench press (BP) exercise influences (a) the within-session reliability and magnitude of mean concentric velocity (MCV) values recorded against a range of submaximal loads and (b) the accuracy of the individualized load-velocity profile to estimate the BP 1 repetition maximum (1RM). Fifteen men (BP 1RM relative to body mass = 1.08 ± 0.22) performed an incremental loading test until reaching the 1RM on 2 separate sessions. Subjects received verbal velocity performance feedback in 1 session (knowledge of results [KR]), and no KR was provided in another session (Control). A linear velocity transducer was used to collect the MCV against 4 loads (40-55-70-85% 1RM), and the BP 1RM was estimated from the individualized load-velocity relationship modeled through the multiple-point (40-55-70-85% 1RM) and 2-point methods (40-85% 1RM). The KR condition provided a higher reliability (coefficient of variation [CV]: KR = 2.41%, Control = 3.54%; CV ratio = 1.47) and magnitude (p = 0.001; effect size [ES] = 0.78) of MCV for the 40% 1RM, but no significant differences in reliability (CV ratio ≤1.15) nor in the magnitude (p ≥ 0.058; ES range = 0.00-0.32) were observed for higher loads. The accuracy in the estimation of the 1RM was higher for the KR (absolute errors: multiple-point = 3.1 ± 2.3 kg; 2-point = 3.5 ± 2.1 kg) compared with the Control condition (absolute errors: 4.1 ± 1.9 kg for both multiple-point and 2-point methods). These results encourage the provision of verbal velocity performance feedback during BP testing procedures. SN - 1533-4287 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/32282530/Velocity_Performance_Feedback_During_the_Free_Weight_Bench_Press_Testing_Procedure:_An_Effective_Strategy_to_Increase_the_Reliability_and_One_Repetition_Maximum_Accuracy_Prediction_ DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -