Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Acoustic properties of fracture of dental restorative materials and endocrown restorations under quasi-static loading.
Dent Mater. 2020 05; 36(5):617-625.DM

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

(1) To investigate the properties of acoustic emission (AE) signals from fracture of dental materials and endocrown restorations during quasi-static compression using the continuous wavelet transform analysis. (2) To determine by the parameters of AE signals in which structural element of tooth-endocrown system the fracture starts.

METHODS

Five restorative materials (zirconium dioxide (Prettau zirconia), ceramics (IPS e.max Press), metal ceramics (GC Initial MC+Nicrallium N2 BCS), composite resin (Nano Q), luting cement (Relyx™ U200)) were manufactured into discs, 13mm diameter, 5mm thick, which were divided into 5 groups (Group B, C, D, E, F, respectively) and included into Type 1. Twenty-five extracted human molars were divided into 5 groups and included into Type 2: Group A (control, no restoration); BE (tooth restored by zirconium dioxide endocrowns); CE (restored by ceramic endocrowns); DE (restored by metal ceramic endocrowns); EE (restored by composite resin endocrowns). An increasing load was applied to the center of the samples with a hard steel ball until a fracture occurred. The loading rate was 0.12mm/min. Two-channel AE detection system was used to record the AE activity during testing. The parameters including the peak frequency, bandwidth, duration time and energy of AE signals were analyzed.

RESULTS

The restorative materials (Type 1) differ from each other by acoustic properties such as the peak frequency main bands and energy of AE signals. The detected AE signals correspond to the different fracture types. The dominant fracture mechanism of Group C, E and F specimens was the macrocracking (brittle fracture), and of Group D specimens was the microcracking, which alternated with the plastic deformation and macrocracking. For the number of events corresponding to the brittle fracture, statistically significant differences (p<0.05) were found between all group pairs. AE signals were not released during compression test of the zirconium dioxide samples, thus the fracture was not detected. All the AE signals detected during compression test of the different endocrown systems (Type 2) had two peak frequency bands. The fracture of Groups A, BE, CE and DE samples characterized by alternating the micro- and macrocracking with plastic deformation, and the brittle fracture was the dominant fracture mechanism. The restorations of Group EE fractured without plastic deformation. For the number of events corresponding to the brittle fracture, statistically insignificant differences (p>0.05) were found between Groups A vs CE and A vs EE, and statistically significant differences (p<0.05) were found between Groups A vs BE and A vs DE.

SIGNIFICANCE

The initiation of fracture in the restorations with endocrowns made from different materials begins with the tooth damage. The metal ceramic endocrown restoration showed the highest fracture resistance, what is especially important for clinical use.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Department of Acoustic Methods of Technical Diagnostics, Karpenko Physico-Mechanical Institute of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 5 Naukova Str., Lviv 79060, Ukraine(1).Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Danylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University, 69 Pekarska Str., Lviv 79010, Ukraine(2).Department of Acoustic Methods of Technical Diagnostics, Karpenko Physico-Mechanical Institute of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 5 Naukova Str., Lviv 79060, Ukraine(1). Electronic address: stan_olena@yahoo.com.Department of Automobile and Transport Technology, Lutsk National Technical University, 75 Lvivska Str., Lutsk 43018, Ukraine(3).

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

32299664

Citation

Skalskyi, Valentyn, et al. "Acoustic Properties of Fracture of Dental Restorative Materials and Endocrown Restorations Under Quasi-static Loading." Dental Materials : Official Publication of the Academy of Dental Materials, vol. 36, no. 5, 2020, pp. 617-625.
Skalskyi V, Makeev V, Stankevych O, et al. Acoustic properties of fracture of dental restorative materials and endocrown restorations under quasi-static loading. Dent Mater. 2020;36(5):617-625.
Skalskyi, V., Makeev, V., Stankevych, O., & Dubytskyi, O. (2020). Acoustic properties of fracture of dental restorative materials and endocrown restorations under quasi-static loading. Dental Materials : Official Publication of the Academy of Dental Materials, 36(5), 617-625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2020.03.014
Skalskyi V, et al. Acoustic Properties of Fracture of Dental Restorative Materials and Endocrown Restorations Under Quasi-static Loading. Dent Mater. 2020;36(5):617-625. PubMed PMID: 32299664.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Acoustic properties of fracture of dental restorative materials and endocrown restorations under quasi-static loading. AU - Skalskyi,Valentyn, AU - Makeev,Valentyn, AU - Stankevych,Olena, AU - Dubytskyi,Olexandr, Y1 - 2020/04/13/ PY - 2019/09/20/received PY - 2020/02/17/revised PY - 2020/03/12/accepted PY - 2020/4/18/pubmed PY - 2020/7/21/medline PY - 2020/4/18/entrez KW - Acoustic emission KW - Dental material KW - Endocrown KW - Fracture KW - Wavelet transform SP - 617 EP - 625 JF - Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials JO - Dent Mater VL - 36 IS - 5 N2 - OBJECTIVES: (1) To investigate the properties of acoustic emission (AE) signals from fracture of dental materials and endocrown restorations during quasi-static compression using the continuous wavelet transform analysis. (2) To determine by the parameters of AE signals in which structural element of tooth-endocrown system the fracture starts. METHODS: Five restorative materials (zirconium dioxide (Prettau zirconia), ceramics (IPS e.max Press), metal ceramics (GC Initial MC+Nicrallium N2 BCS), composite resin (Nano Q), luting cement (Relyx™ U200)) were manufactured into discs, 13mm diameter, 5mm thick, which were divided into 5 groups (Group B, C, D, E, F, respectively) and included into Type 1. Twenty-five extracted human molars were divided into 5 groups and included into Type 2: Group A (control, no restoration); BE (tooth restored by zirconium dioxide endocrowns); CE (restored by ceramic endocrowns); DE (restored by metal ceramic endocrowns); EE (restored by composite resin endocrowns). An increasing load was applied to the center of the samples with a hard steel ball until a fracture occurred. The loading rate was 0.12mm/min. Two-channel AE detection system was used to record the AE activity during testing. The parameters including the peak frequency, bandwidth, duration time and energy of AE signals were analyzed. RESULTS: The restorative materials (Type 1) differ from each other by acoustic properties such as the peak frequency main bands and energy of AE signals. The detected AE signals correspond to the different fracture types. The dominant fracture mechanism of Group C, E and F specimens was the macrocracking (brittle fracture), and of Group D specimens was the microcracking, which alternated with the plastic deformation and macrocracking. For the number of events corresponding to the brittle fracture, statistically significant differences (p<0.05) were found between all group pairs. AE signals were not released during compression test of the zirconium dioxide samples, thus the fracture was not detected. All the AE signals detected during compression test of the different endocrown systems (Type 2) had two peak frequency bands. The fracture of Groups A, BE, CE and DE samples characterized by alternating the micro- and macrocracking with plastic deformation, and the brittle fracture was the dominant fracture mechanism. The restorations of Group EE fractured without plastic deformation. For the number of events corresponding to the brittle fracture, statistically insignificant differences (p>0.05) were found between Groups A vs CE and A vs EE, and statistically significant differences (p<0.05) were found between Groups A vs BE and A vs DE. SIGNIFICANCE: The initiation of fracture in the restorations with endocrowns made from different materials begins with the tooth damage. The metal ceramic endocrown restoration showed the highest fracture resistance, what is especially important for clinical use. SN - 1879-0097 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/32299664/Acoustic_properties_of_fracture_of_dental_restorative_materials_and_endocrown_restorations_under_quasi_static_loading_ L2 - https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0109-5641(20)30069-5 DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -