Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Global incidence of incomplete surgical excision in adult patients with non-melanoma skin cancer: study protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.
Syst Rev. 2020 04 17; 9(1):83.SR

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Non-melanoma skin cancer, which includes basal cell carcinoma and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, is the commonest malignancy worldwide. The mainstay of treatment is surgical excision. Despite this being an exceptionally common procedure, it is not known what the accepted standard is for incomplete excision. Multiple single-centre, regional and national studies have previously reported their incidence of incomplete excision in isolation. Furthermore, is it not known what effect potential risk factors such as the operating group, location of lesions, type of reconstruction, histological components or use of loupe magnification have on the incidence of incomplete excisions. The objective of this study will be to systematically evaluate observational data that present incidence of incomplete surgical excision amongst adult patients with non-melanoma skin cancer worldwide.

METHODS

We designed and registered a study protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of descriptive epidemiology data. A comprehensive literature search will be conducted (from January 2000 onwards) in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, CINAHL, EMCare and Cochrane Library. Grey literature will be identified through searching Open Grey, dissertation databases (e.g. Open Access Theses and Dissertations) and clinical trial registers (e.g. WHO ICTRP). Observational studies (cohort, cross-sectional, case series and clinical audits) reporting the incidence of incomplete surgical excision and conducted in adult patients with non-melanoma skin cancer will be included. The primary outcome will be the incidence of incomplete surgical excision (defined as residual tumour at either the peripheral or deep margin). Secondary outcomes will be risk factors that may affect incomplete excision (e.g. operating group, location of lesions, types of reconstruction, histological components). Data will not be extracted if the study uses other surgical techniques such as Mohs micrographic surgery, intra-operative frozen section, incision, shave or punch biopsies. Two investigators will independently screen all citations, full-text articles and abstract data. Potential conflicts will be resolved through discussion. No limitations will be imposed on publication status or language of publication. The study methodological quality (or bias) will be appraised using an appropriate tool. If feasible, we will conduct a random effect meta-analysis of observational data. Incidence estimates will be stratified according to cancer type (e.g. basal cell carcinoma vs squamous cell carcinoma) and operating group (e.g. dermatology, plastic surgery and general practice). Additional analyses will be conducted to explore the potential sources of heterogeneity (e.g. methodological quality, sample size).

DISCUSSION

This systematic review will summarise the best available evidence and definitively establish the incidence of incomplete surgical excision in non-melanoma skin cancer. It will determine if there is variation observed amongst different operating groups and provide some evidence for potential other factors causing this difference. This knowledge will provide a standard for future audits and will contribute to improving the treatment of non-melanoma skin cancer treatment.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42019157936.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, Royal Free Hospital, Pond Street, London, NW3 2QG, UK. grant.nolan@nhs.net. Whiston Hospital, St Helens and Knowsley Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Warrington Road, Prescot, Merseyside, L35 5DR, UK. grant.nolan@nhs.net.Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford, OX3 7LD, UK. Stoke Mandeville Hospital, Buckinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust, Mandeville Rd, Aylesbury, HP21 8AL, UK.Royal Stoke University Hospital, Newcastle Rd, Stoke-on-Trent, ST4 6QG, UK.Castle Hill Hospital, Hull University Teaching Hospitals, Castle Road, Cottingham, East Riding of Yorkshire, HU16 5JQ, UK.Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford, OX3 7LD, UK.

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

32303259

Citation

Nolan, Grant S., et al. "Global Incidence of Incomplete Surgical Excision in Adult Patients With Non-melanoma Skin Cancer: Study Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies." Systematic Reviews, vol. 9, no. 1, 2020, p. 83.
Nolan GS, Wormald JCR, Kiely AL, et al. Global incidence of incomplete surgical excision in adult patients with non-melanoma skin cancer: study protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Syst Rev. 2020;9(1):83.
Nolan, G. S., Wormald, J. C. R., Kiely, A. L., Totty, J. P., & Jain, A. (2020). Global incidence of incomplete surgical excision in adult patients with non-melanoma skin cancer: study protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Systematic Reviews, 9(1), 83. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-01350-5
Nolan GS, et al. Global Incidence of Incomplete Surgical Excision in Adult Patients With Non-melanoma Skin Cancer: Study Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies. Syst Rev. 2020 04 17;9(1):83. PubMed PMID: 32303259.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Global incidence of incomplete surgical excision in adult patients with non-melanoma skin cancer: study protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. AU - Nolan,Grant S, AU - Wormald,Justin C R, AU - Kiely,Ailbhe L, AU - Totty,Joshua P, AU - Jain,Abhilash, Y1 - 2020/04/17/ PY - 2020/01/03/received PY - 2020/04/05/accepted PY - 2020/4/19/entrez PY - 2020/4/19/pubmed PY - 2021/6/25/medline KW - Carcinoma, Basal Cell KW - Carcinoma, Squamous Cell KW - Margins of excision KW - Skin neoplasia KW - Systematic review SP - 83 EP - 83 JF - Systematic reviews JO - Syst Rev VL - 9 IS - 1 N2 - BACKGROUND: Non-melanoma skin cancer, which includes basal cell carcinoma and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, is the commonest malignancy worldwide. The mainstay of treatment is surgical excision. Despite this being an exceptionally common procedure, it is not known what the accepted standard is for incomplete excision. Multiple single-centre, regional and national studies have previously reported their incidence of incomplete excision in isolation. Furthermore, is it not known what effect potential risk factors such as the operating group, location of lesions, type of reconstruction, histological components or use of loupe magnification have on the incidence of incomplete excisions. The objective of this study will be to systematically evaluate observational data that present incidence of incomplete surgical excision amongst adult patients with non-melanoma skin cancer worldwide. METHODS: We designed and registered a study protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of descriptive epidemiology data. A comprehensive literature search will be conducted (from January 2000 onwards) in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, CINAHL, EMCare and Cochrane Library. Grey literature will be identified through searching Open Grey, dissertation databases (e.g. Open Access Theses and Dissertations) and clinical trial registers (e.g. WHO ICTRP). Observational studies (cohort, cross-sectional, case series and clinical audits) reporting the incidence of incomplete surgical excision and conducted in adult patients with non-melanoma skin cancer will be included. The primary outcome will be the incidence of incomplete surgical excision (defined as residual tumour at either the peripheral or deep margin). Secondary outcomes will be risk factors that may affect incomplete excision (e.g. operating group, location of lesions, types of reconstruction, histological components). Data will not be extracted if the study uses other surgical techniques such as Mohs micrographic surgery, intra-operative frozen section, incision, shave or punch biopsies. Two investigators will independently screen all citations, full-text articles and abstract data. Potential conflicts will be resolved through discussion. No limitations will be imposed on publication status or language of publication. The study methodological quality (or bias) will be appraised using an appropriate tool. If feasible, we will conduct a random effect meta-analysis of observational data. Incidence estimates will be stratified according to cancer type (e.g. basal cell carcinoma vs squamous cell carcinoma) and operating group (e.g. dermatology, plastic surgery and general practice). Additional analyses will be conducted to explore the potential sources of heterogeneity (e.g. methodological quality, sample size). DISCUSSION: This systematic review will summarise the best available evidence and definitively establish the incidence of incomplete surgical excision in non-melanoma skin cancer. It will determine if there is variation observed amongst different operating groups and provide some evidence for potential other factors causing this difference. This knowledge will provide a standard for future audits and will contribute to improving the treatment of non-melanoma skin cancer treatment. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42019157936. SN - 2046-4053 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/32303259/Global_incidence_of_incomplete_surgical_excision_in_adult_patients_with_non_melanoma_skin_cancer:_study_protocol_for_a_systematic_review_and_meta_analysis_of_observational_studies_ DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -