[Vitamin D and coronavirus: a new field of use?]Recenti Prog Med. 2020 Apr; 111(4):253-256.RP
Abstract
Given the succession of communications in scientific and popular circuits, tending to take for granted a role for vitamin D in the control of the coronavirus pandemic, the authors conducted an analysis of the literature currently available in order to recognize what is supported by opinions personal and what evidence of effectiveness. At the end of the bibliographic survey there is the current absence of evidence of efficacy in favor of vitamin D in the treatment of coronavirus infection in its various expressions. The diffusion of personal opinions as if they were evidence can be a disturbing factor for adequate assistance and for correct research.
Links
MeSH
Pub Type(s)
Journal Article
Review
Language
ita
PubMed ID
32319447
Citation
Maestri, Emilio, et al. "[Vitamin D and Coronavirus: a New Field of Use?]." Recenti Progressi in Medicina, vol. 111, no. 4, 2020, pp. 253-256.
Maestri E, Formoso G, Da Cas R, et al. [Vitamin D and coronavirus: a new field of use?]. Recenti Prog Med. 2020;111(4):253-256.
Maestri, E., Formoso, G., Da Cas, R., Mammarella, F., Guerrizio, M. A., & Trotta, F. (2020). [Vitamin D and coronavirus: a new field of use?]. Recenti Progressi in Medicina, 111(4), 253-256. https://doi.org/10.1701/3347.33188
Maestri E, et al. [Vitamin D and Coronavirus: a New Field of Use?]. Recenti Prog Med. 2020;111(4):253-256. PubMed PMID: 32319447.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR
T1 - [Vitamin D and coronavirus: a new field of use?]
AU - Maestri,Emilio,
AU - Formoso,Giulio,
AU - Da Cas,Roberto,
AU - Mammarella,Federica,
AU - Guerrizio,Maria Alessandra,
AU - Trotta,Francesco,
PY - 2020/4/23/entrez
PY - 2020/4/23/pubmed
PY - 2020/9/18/medline
SP - 253
EP - 256
JF - Recenti progressi in medicina
JO - Recenti Prog Med
VL - 111
IS - 4
N2 - Given the succession of communications in scientific and popular circuits, tending to take for granted a role for vitamin D in the control of the coronavirus pandemic, the authors conducted an analysis of the literature currently available in order to recognize what is supported by opinions personal and what evidence of effectiveness. At the end of the bibliographic survey there is the current absence of evidence of efficacy in favor of vitamin D in the treatment of coronavirus infection in its various expressions. The diffusion of personal opinions as if they were evidence can be a disturbing factor for adequate assistance and for correct research.
SN - 2038-1840
UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/32319447/[Vitamin_D_and_coronavirus:_a_new_field_of_use]
L2 - https://doi.org/10.1701/3347.33188
DB - PRIME
DP - Unbound Medicine
ER -