Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Are YouTube™ videos a reliable source of information about genioplasty?
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Apr 30 [Online ahead of print]JS

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and quality of the information content of popular YouTube™ videos about genioplasty.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The keywords "genioplasty, sliding genioplasty and genioplasty surgery" were searched on YouTube™. It was filtered by the view count and the first 70 videos that met the inclusion criteria were evaluated. Each video was scored as ranging from 0 to 8 point and the videos were classified as bad, poor, good and excellent content. Kruskal-Wallis test was performed for statistical analysis. Intra-observer and inter-observer agreement were calculated Cohen's Kappa index.

RESULTS

The videos uploaded by the individuals were significantly higher total video duration (P<0.001), number of comments (P=0.048) and viewing rate (P=0.036) than the others and the videos generally included their treatment journey. Most of the videos included bad information content. The number of likes (P=0.037), dislikes (P=0.037) and the interaction index (P=0.026) of the bad information content videos were significantly higher than the others. The other parameters did not show a significant difference (P>0.05).

CONCLUSION

The results of this study would suggest that YouTube™ is not currently an appropriate source of information about genioplasty for the patients.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Ordu University, Ordu, Turkey.Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Ordu Oniversity, 52200 Ordu, Turkey. Electronic address: skbuyuk@gmail.com.Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Ordu University, Ordu, Turkey.

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

32360751

Citation

Ayranci, F, et al. "Are YouTube™ Videos a Reliable Source of Information About Genioplasty?" Journal of Stomatology, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2020.
Ayranci F, Buyuk SK, Kahveci K. Are YouTube™ videos a reliable source of information about genioplasty? J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020.
Ayranci, F., Buyuk, S. K., & Kahveci, K. (2020). Are YouTube™ videos a reliable source of information about genioplasty? Journal of Stomatology, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2020.04.009
Ayranci F, Buyuk SK, Kahveci K. Are YouTube™ Videos a Reliable Source of Information About Genioplasty. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Apr 30; PubMed PMID: 32360751.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Are YouTube™ videos a reliable source of information about genioplasty? AU - Ayranci,F, AU - Buyuk,S K, AU - Kahveci,K, Y1 - 2020/04/30/ PY - 2020/03/31/received PY - 2020/04/21/revised PY - 2020/04/23/accepted PY - 2020/5/4/pubmed PY - 2020/5/4/medline PY - 2020/5/4/entrez KW - Genioplasty KW - Patient information KW - Social media KW - YouTube JF - Journal of stomatology, oral and maxillofacial surgery JO - J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg N2 - BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and quality of the information content of popular YouTube™ videos about genioplasty. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The keywords "genioplasty, sliding genioplasty and genioplasty surgery" were searched on YouTube™. It was filtered by the view count and the first 70 videos that met the inclusion criteria were evaluated. Each video was scored as ranging from 0 to 8 point and the videos were classified as bad, poor, good and excellent content. Kruskal-Wallis test was performed for statistical analysis. Intra-observer and inter-observer agreement were calculated Cohen's Kappa index. RESULTS: The videos uploaded by the individuals were significantly higher total video duration (P<0.001), number of comments (P=0.048) and viewing rate (P=0.036) than the others and the videos generally included their treatment journey. Most of the videos included bad information content. The number of likes (P=0.037), dislikes (P=0.037) and the interaction index (P=0.026) of the bad information content videos were significantly higher than the others. The other parameters did not show a significant difference (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: The results of this study would suggest that YouTube™ is not currently an appropriate source of information about genioplasty for the patients. SN - 2468-7855 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/32360751/Are_YouTube™_videos_a_reliable_source_of_information_about_genioplasty L2 - https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2468-7855(20)30091-4 DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -
Try the Free App:
Prime PubMed app for iOS iPhone iPad
Prime PubMed app for Android
Prime PubMed is provided
free to individuals by:
Unbound Medicine.