Citation
Kim, Seong Eun, et al. "Viral Load Kinetics of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Saliva in Korean Patients: a Prospective Multi-center Comparative Study." Journal of Korean Medical Science, vol. 35, no. 31, 2020, pp. e287.
Kim SE, Lee JY, Lee A, et al. Viral Load Kinetics of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Saliva in Korean Patients: a Prospective Multi-center Comparative Study. J Korean Med Sci. 2020;35(31):e287.
Kim, S. E., Lee, J. Y., Lee, A., Kim, S., Park, K. H., Jung, S. I., Kang, S. J., Oh, T. H., Kim, U. J., Lee, S. Y., Kee, S. J., & Jang, H. C. (2020). Viral Load Kinetics of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Saliva in Korean Patients: a Prospective Multi-center Comparative Study. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 35(31), e287. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e287
Kim SE, et al. Viral Load Kinetics of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Saliva in Korean Patients: a Prospective Multi-center Comparative Study. J Korean Med Sci. 2020 Aug 10;35(31):e287. PubMed PMID: 32776725.
TY - JOUR
T1 - Viral Load Kinetics of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Saliva in Korean Patients: a Prospective Multi-center Comparative Study.
AU - Kim,Seong Eun,
AU - Lee,Ji Yeon,
AU - Lee,Ahrang,
AU - Kim,Soosung,
AU - Park,Kyung Hwa,
AU - Jung,Sook In,
AU - Kang,Seung Ji,
AU - Oh,Tae Hoon,
AU - Kim,Uh Jin,
AU - Lee,Seung Yeob,
AU - Kee,Seung Jung,
AU - Jang,Hee Chang,
Y1 - 2020/08/10/
PY - 2020/06/26/received
PY - 2020/08/03/accepted
PY - 2020/8/11/entrez
PY - 2020/8/11/pubmed
PY - 2020/8/20/medline
KW - Nasopharyngeal Swab
KW - Oropharyngeal Swab
KW - SARS-CoV-2 PCR
KW - Saliva
SP - e287
EP - e287
JF - Journal of Korean medical science
JO - J Korean Med Sci
VL - 35
IS - 31
N2 - BACKGROUND: This study was performed to compare the viral load and kinetics of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) in saliva with those in standard nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal (NP/OP) swabs. METHODS: Fifteen patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection from four hospitals were prospectively enrolled and matched samples of nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swabs and saliva were collected at Day 1 of admission and every other day till consequently negative for two times. Real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) was performed to detect the envelope (E) and RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRP) genes. RESULTS: The cycle threshold values of saliva were comparable to those of NP/OP swabs overall (P = 0.720, Mann-Whitney U test). However, the overall sensitivity of rRT-PCR using saliva was 64% (34/53), which is lower than the 77% (41/53) using NP/OP swabs. The sensitivity of rRT-PCR using saliva was especially lower in early stage of symptom onset (1-5 days; 8/15; 53%) and in patients who did not have sputum (12/22; 55%). CONCLUSION: Saliva sample itself is not appropriate for initial diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) to replace NP/OP swabs, especially for the person who does not produce sputum. COVID-19 cannot be excluded when the test using saliva is negative, and it is necessary to retest using NP/OP swabs.
SN - 1598-6357
UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/32776725/Viral_Load_Kinetics_of_SARS_CoV_2_Infection_in_Saliva_in_Korean_Patients:_a_Prospective_Multi_center_Comparative_Study_
L2 - https://jkms.org/DOIx.php?id=10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e287
DB - PRIME
DP - Unbound Medicine
ER -