Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Guidelines-similarities and dissimilarities: a systematic review of international clinical practice guidelines for pregnancy hypertension.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 02; 226(2S):S1222-S1236.AJ

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to review pregnancy hypertension clinical practice guidelines to inform international clinical practice and research priorities.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Relevant national and international clinical practice guidelines, 2009-19, published in English, French, Dutch or German.

STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS

Following published methods and prospective registration (CRD42019123787), a literature search was updated. CPGs were identified by 2 authors independently who scored quality and usefulness for practice (Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II instrument), abstracted data, and resolved any disagreement by consensus.

RESULTS

Of note, 15 of 17 identified clinical practice guidelines (4 international) were deemed "clinically useful" and had recommendations abstracted. The highest Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II scores were from government organizations, and scores have improved over time. The following were consistently recommended: (1) automated blood pressure measurement with devices validated for pregnancy and preeclampsia, reflecting increasing recognition of the prevalence of white-coat hypertension and the potential usefulness of home blood pressure monitoring; (2) use of dipstick proteinuria testing for screening followed by quantitative testing by urinary protein-to-creatinine ratio or 24-hour urine collection; (3) key definitions and most aspects of classification, including a broad definition of preeclampsia (which includes proteinuria and maternal end-organ dysfunction, including headache and visual symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of platelets, creatinine, or liver enzymes) and a recognition that it can worsen after delivery; (4) preeclampsia prevention with aspirin; (5) treatment of severe hypertension, most commonly with intravenous labetalol, oral nifedipine, or intravenous hydralazine; (6) treatment for nonsevere hypertension when undertaken, with oral labetalol (in particular), methyldopa, or nifedipine, with recommendations against the use of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone inhibitors; (7) magnesium sulfate for eclampsia treatment and prevention among women with "severe" preeclampsia; (8) antenatal corticosteroids for preterm birth but not hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelet count syndrome; (9) delivery at term for preeclampsia; (10) a focus on usual labor and delivery care but avoidance of ergometrine; and (11) an appreciation that long-term health complications are increased in incidence, mandating lifestyle change and risk factor modification. Lack of uniformity was seen in the following areas: (1) the components of a broad preeclampsia definition (specifically respiratory and gastrointestinal symptoms, fetal manifestations, and biomarkers), what constitutes severe preeclampsia, and whether the definition has utility because at present what constitutes severe preeclampsia by some guidelines that mandate proteinuria now defines any preeclampsia for most other clinical practice guidelines; (2) how preeclampsia risk should be identified early in pregnancy, and aspirin administered for preeclampsia prevention, because multivariable models (with biomarkers and ultrasonography added to clinical risk markers) used in this way to guide aspirin therapy can substantially reduce the incidence of preterm preeclampsia; (3) the value of calcium added to aspirin for preeclampsia prevention, particularly for women with low intake and at increased risk of preeclampsia; (4) emerging recommendations to normalize blood pressure with antihypertensive agents even in the absence of comorbidities; (5) fetal neuroprotection as an indication for magnesium sulfate in the absence of "severe" preeclampsia; and (6) timing of birth for chronic and gestational hypertension and preterm preeclampsia.

CONCLUSION

Consistent recommendations should be implemented and audited. Inconsistencies should be the focus of research.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Department of Women and Children's Health, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Frauenklinik, Bürgerspital Solothurn, Solothurn, Switzerland.Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.Department of Women and Children's Health, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.Department of Women and Children's Health, King's College London, London, United Kingdom. Electronic address: laura.a.magee@kcl.ac.uk.

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article
Systematic Review

Language

eng

PubMed ID

32828743

Citation

Scott, Georgia, et al. "Guidelines-similarities and Dissimilarities: a Systematic Review of International Clinical Practice Guidelines for Pregnancy Hypertension." American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 226, no. 2S, 2022, pp. S1222-S1236.
Scott G, Gillon TE, Pels A, et al. Guidelines-similarities and dissimilarities: a systematic review of international clinical practice guidelines for pregnancy hypertension. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022;226(2S):S1222-S1236.
Scott, G., Gillon, T. E., Pels, A., von Dadelszen, P., & Magee, L. A. (2022). Guidelines-similarities and dissimilarities: a systematic review of international clinical practice guidelines for pregnancy hypertension. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 226(2S), S1222-S1236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2020.08.018
Scott G, et al. Guidelines-similarities and Dissimilarities: a Systematic Review of International Clinical Practice Guidelines for Pregnancy Hypertension. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022;226(2S):S1222-S1236. PubMed PMID: 32828743.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Guidelines-similarities and dissimilarities: a systematic review of international clinical practice guidelines for pregnancy hypertension. AU - Scott,Georgia, AU - Gillon,Tessa E, AU - Pels,Anouk, AU - von Dadelszen,Peter, AU - Magee,Laura A, Y1 - 2020/08/20/ PY - 2020/06/03/received PY - 2020/07/15/revised PY - 2020/08/10/accepted PY - 2020/8/24/pubmed PY - 2022/3/9/medline PY - 2020/8/24/entrez KW - classification KW - clinical practice guideline KW - pregnancy hypertension KW - prevention KW - treatment SP - S1222 EP - S1236 JF - American journal of obstetrics and gynecology JO - Am J Obstet Gynecol VL - 226 IS - 2S N2 - OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to review pregnancy hypertension clinical practice guidelines to inform international clinical practice and research priorities. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Relevant national and international clinical practice guidelines, 2009-19, published in English, French, Dutch or German. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS: Following published methods and prospective registration (CRD42019123787), a literature search was updated. CPGs were identified by 2 authors independently who scored quality and usefulness for practice (Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II instrument), abstracted data, and resolved any disagreement by consensus. RESULTS: Of note, 15 of 17 identified clinical practice guidelines (4 international) were deemed "clinically useful" and had recommendations abstracted. The highest Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II scores were from government organizations, and scores have improved over time. The following were consistently recommended: (1) automated blood pressure measurement with devices validated for pregnancy and preeclampsia, reflecting increasing recognition of the prevalence of white-coat hypertension and the potential usefulness of home blood pressure monitoring; (2) use of dipstick proteinuria testing for screening followed by quantitative testing by urinary protein-to-creatinine ratio or 24-hour urine collection; (3) key definitions and most aspects of classification, including a broad definition of preeclampsia (which includes proteinuria and maternal end-organ dysfunction, including headache and visual symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of platelets, creatinine, or liver enzymes) and a recognition that it can worsen after delivery; (4) preeclampsia prevention with aspirin; (5) treatment of severe hypertension, most commonly with intravenous labetalol, oral nifedipine, or intravenous hydralazine; (6) treatment for nonsevere hypertension when undertaken, with oral labetalol (in particular), methyldopa, or nifedipine, with recommendations against the use of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone inhibitors; (7) magnesium sulfate for eclampsia treatment and prevention among women with "severe" preeclampsia; (8) antenatal corticosteroids for preterm birth but not hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelet count syndrome; (9) delivery at term for preeclampsia; (10) a focus on usual labor and delivery care but avoidance of ergometrine; and (11) an appreciation that long-term health complications are increased in incidence, mandating lifestyle change and risk factor modification. Lack of uniformity was seen in the following areas: (1) the components of a broad preeclampsia definition (specifically respiratory and gastrointestinal symptoms, fetal manifestations, and biomarkers), what constitutes severe preeclampsia, and whether the definition has utility because at present what constitutes severe preeclampsia by some guidelines that mandate proteinuria now defines any preeclampsia for most other clinical practice guidelines; (2) how preeclampsia risk should be identified early in pregnancy, and aspirin administered for preeclampsia prevention, because multivariable models (with biomarkers and ultrasonography added to clinical risk markers) used in this way to guide aspirin therapy can substantially reduce the incidence of preterm preeclampsia; (3) the value of calcium added to aspirin for preeclampsia prevention, particularly for women with low intake and at increased risk of preeclampsia; (4) emerging recommendations to normalize blood pressure with antihypertensive agents even in the absence of comorbidities; (5) fetal neuroprotection as an indication for magnesium sulfate in the absence of "severe" preeclampsia; and (6) timing of birth for chronic and gestational hypertension and preterm preeclampsia. CONCLUSION: Consistent recommendations should be implemented and audited. Inconsistencies should be the focus of research. SN - 1097-6868 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/32828743/Guidelines_similarities_and_dissimilarities:_a_systematic_review_of_international_clinical_practice_guidelines_for_pregnancy_hypertension_ DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -