Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

A comparison of COVID-19, SARS and MERS.
PeerJ. 2020; 8:e9725.P

Abstract

In mid-December 2019, a novel atypical pneumonia broke out in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China and was caused by a newly identified coronavirus, initially termed 2019 Novel Coronavirus and subsequently severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). As of 19 May 2020, a total of 4,731,458 individuals were reported as infected with SARS-CoV-2 among 213 countries, areas or territories with recorded cases, and the overall case-fatality rate was 6.6% (316,169 deaths among 4,731,458 recorded cases), according to the World Health Organization. Studies have shown that SARS-CoV-2 is notably similar to (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus) SARS-CoV that emerged in 2002-2003 and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) that spread during 2012, and these viruses all contributed to global pandemics. The ability of SARS-CoV-2 to rapidly spread a pneumonia-like disease from Hubei Province, China, throughout the world has provoked widespread concern. The main symptoms of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) include fever, cough, myalgia, fatigue and lower respiratory signs. At present, nucleic acid tests are widely recommended as the optimal method for detecting SARS-CoV-2. However, obstacles remain, including the global shortage of testing kits and the presentation of false negatives. Experts suggest that almost everyone in China is susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 infection, and to date, there are no effective treatments. In light of the references published, this review demonstrates the biological features, spread, diagnosis and treatment of SARS-CoV-2 as a whole and aims to analyse the similarities and differences among SARS-CoV-2, SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV to provide new ideas and suggestions for prevention, diagnosis and clinical treatment.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Department of Pediatrics, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.Department of Pediatrics, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.Department of Pediatrics, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.Transplantation Center, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.Department of Biomedical Informatics, School of Life Sciences, Central South University, Changsha, China.Department of Pediatrics, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

32879801

Citation

Hu, Tingting, et al. "A Comparison of COVID-19, SARS and MERS." PeerJ, vol. 8, 2020, pp. e9725.
Hu T, Liu Y, Zhao M, et al. A comparison of COVID-19, SARS and MERS. PeerJ. 2020;8:e9725.
Hu, T., Liu, Y., Zhao, M., Zhuang, Q., Xu, L., & He, Q. (2020). A comparison of COVID-19, SARS and MERS. PeerJ, 8, e9725. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9725
Hu T, et al. A Comparison of COVID-19, SARS and MERS. PeerJ. 2020;8:e9725. PubMed PMID: 32879801.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - A comparison of COVID-19, SARS and MERS. AU - Hu,Tingting, AU - Liu,Ying, AU - Zhao,Mingyi, AU - Zhuang,Quan, AU - Xu,Linyong, AU - He,Qingnan, Y1 - 2020/08/19/ PY - 2020/03/29/received PY - 2020/07/24/accepted PY - 2020/9/4/entrez PY - 2020/9/4/pubmed PY - 2020/9/4/medline KW - COVID-19 KW - Clinical presentations KW - Epidemiology KW - Laboratory diagnosis KW - MERS-CoV KW - Radiological features KW - SARS-CoV SP - e9725 EP - e9725 JF - PeerJ JO - PeerJ VL - 8 N2 - In mid-December 2019, a novel atypical pneumonia broke out in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China and was caused by a newly identified coronavirus, initially termed 2019 Novel Coronavirus and subsequently severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). As of 19 May 2020, a total of 4,731,458 individuals were reported as infected with SARS-CoV-2 among 213 countries, areas or territories with recorded cases, and the overall case-fatality rate was 6.6% (316,169 deaths among 4,731,458 recorded cases), according to the World Health Organization. Studies have shown that SARS-CoV-2 is notably similar to (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus) SARS-CoV that emerged in 2002-2003 and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) that spread during 2012, and these viruses all contributed to global pandemics. The ability of SARS-CoV-2 to rapidly spread a pneumonia-like disease from Hubei Province, China, throughout the world has provoked widespread concern. The main symptoms of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) include fever, cough, myalgia, fatigue and lower respiratory signs. At present, nucleic acid tests are widely recommended as the optimal method for detecting SARS-CoV-2. However, obstacles remain, including the global shortage of testing kits and the presentation of false negatives. Experts suggest that almost everyone in China is susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 infection, and to date, there are no effective treatments. In light of the references published, this review demonstrates the biological features, spread, diagnosis and treatment of SARS-CoV-2 as a whole and aims to analyse the similarities and differences among SARS-CoV-2, SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV to provide new ideas and suggestions for prevention, diagnosis and clinical treatment. SN - 2167-8359 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/32879801/A_comparison_of_COVID_19_SARS_and_MERS_ DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -
Try the Free App:
Prime PubMed app for iOS iPhone iPad
Prime PubMed app for Android
Prime PubMed is provided
free to individuals by:
Unbound Medicine.