Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Identifying factors that conjointly influence nicotine vaping product relative harm perception among smokers and recent ex-smokers: Findings from the 2016 ITC Four Country Smoking and Vaping Survey.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021 01 01; 218:108370.DA

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Use of nicotine vaping products (NVPs) to replace smoking is often influenced by perceived harmfulness of these products relative to smoking. This study aimed to identify factors that conjointly influenced NVP relative harm perception among smokers and ex-smokers.

METHODS

Data (n = 11,838) from adult smokers and ex-smokers (quit < 2 years) who participated in the 2016 ITC 4 Country Smoking and Vaping Surveys in Australia, Canada, England and the US were analyzed. Decision tree models were used to classify respondents into those who perceived vaping as less harmful than smoking ("correct" perception) versus otherwise ("incorrect" perception) based on their socio-demographic, smoking and vaping related variables.

RESULTS

Decision tree analysis identified nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) harmfulness perceptions relative to smoking, perceived vaping portrayal in the media and other sources as positive, negative or balanced, recency of seeking online vaping information, and age as the key variables that interacted conjointly to classify respondents into those with "correct" versus "incorrect" harm perceptions of vaping relative to smoking (model performance accuracy = 0.70-0.74). In all countries, NRT relative harmfulness perception and vaping portrayal perception were consistently the two most important classifying variables, with other variables showing some country differences.

CONCLUSIONS

In all four countries, perception of NVP relative harmfulness among smokers and recent ex-smokers is strongly influenced by a combination of NRT relative harmfulness perception and vaping portrayal in the media and other sources. These conjoint factors can serve as useful markers for identifying subgroups more vulnerable to misperception about NVP relative harmfulness to benefit from corrective intervention.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia. Electronic address: hua.yong@deakin.edu.au.Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia.University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Ontario, Canada; University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Western University, Ontario, Canada; Lakehead University, Ontario, Canada.Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada.University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Language

eng

PubMed ID

33139154

Citation

Yong, Hua-Hie, et al. "Identifying Factors That Conjointly Influence Nicotine Vaping Product Relative Harm Perception Among Smokers and Recent Ex-smokers: Findings From the 2016 ITC Four Country Smoking and Vaping Survey." Drug and Alcohol Dependence, vol. 218, 2021, p. 108370.
Yong HH, Karmakar C, Motin MA, et al. Identifying factors that conjointly influence nicotine vaping product relative harm perception among smokers and recent ex-smokers: Findings from the 2016 ITC Four Country Smoking and Vaping Survey. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021;218:108370.
Yong, H. H., Karmakar, C., Motin, M. A., Borland, R., Elton-Marshall, T., Cummings, K. M., Fong, G. T., & Thompson, M. E. (2021). Identifying factors that conjointly influence nicotine vaping product relative harm perception among smokers and recent ex-smokers: Findings from the 2016 ITC Four Country Smoking and Vaping Survey. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 218, 108370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108370
Yong HH, et al. Identifying Factors That Conjointly Influence Nicotine Vaping Product Relative Harm Perception Among Smokers and Recent Ex-smokers: Findings From the 2016 ITC Four Country Smoking and Vaping Survey. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021 01 1;218:108370. PubMed PMID: 33139154.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Identifying factors that conjointly influence nicotine vaping product relative harm perception among smokers and recent ex-smokers: Findings from the 2016 ITC Four Country Smoking and Vaping Survey. AU - Yong,Hua-Hie, AU - Karmakar,Chandan, AU - Motin,Mohammod Abdul, AU - Borland,Ron, AU - Elton-Marshall,Tara, AU - Cummings,K Michael, AU - Fong,Geoffrey T, AU - Thompson,Mary E, Y1 - 2020/10/20/ PY - 2020/07/17/received PY - 2020/09/21/revised PY - 2020/10/11/accepted PY - 2020/11/4/pubmed PY - 2021/5/29/medline PY - 2020/11/3/entrez KW - Decision tree analysis KW - Ex-smokers KW - Nicotine vaping products KW - Risk perception KW - Smokers SP - 108370 EP - 108370 JF - Drug and alcohol dependence JO - Drug Alcohol Depend VL - 218 N2 - BACKGROUND: Use of nicotine vaping products (NVPs) to replace smoking is often influenced by perceived harmfulness of these products relative to smoking. This study aimed to identify factors that conjointly influenced NVP relative harm perception among smokers and ex-smokers. METHODS: Data (n = 11,838) from adult smokers and ex-smokers (quit < 2 years) who participated in the 2016 ITC 4 Country Smoking and Vaping Surveys in Australia, Canada, England and the US were analyzed. Decision tree models were used to classify respondents into those who perceived vaping as less harmful than smoking ("correct" perception) versus otherwise ("incorrect" perception) based on their socio-demographic, smoking and vaping related variables. RESULTS: Decision tree analysis identified nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) harmfulness perceptions relative to smoking, perceived vaping portrayal in the media and other sources as positive, negative or balanced, recency of seeking online vaping information, and age as the key variables that interacted conjointly to classify respondents into those with "correct" versus "incorrect" harm perceptions of vaping relative to smoking (model performance accuracy = 0.70-0.74). In all countries, NRT relative harmfulness perception and vaping portrayal perception were consistently the two most important classifying variables, with other variables showing some country differences. CONCLUSIONS: In all four countries, perception of NVP relative harmfulness among smokers and recent ex-smokers is strongly influenced by a combination of NRT relative harmfulness perception and vaping portrayal in the media and other sources. These conjoint factors can serve as useful markers for identifying subgroups more vulnerable to misperception about NVP relative harmfulness to benefit from corrective intervention. SN - 1879-0046 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/33139154/Identifying_factors_that_conjointly_influence_nicotine_vaping_product_relative_harm_perception_among_smokers_and_recent_ex_smokers:_Findings_from_the_2016_ITC_Four_Country_Smoking_and_Vaping_Survey_ DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -