Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Why Oxford's positive COVID vaccine results are puzzling scientists.
Nature. 2020 Dec; 588(7836):16-18.Nat

Links

Publisher Full Text (DOI)

Authors

Callaway E
No affiliation info available

MeSH

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicDrug IndustryHumansImmunization ScheduleModels, ImmunologicalSARS-CoV-2Spike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusUnited KingdomVaccination

Pub Type(s)

News

Language

eng

PubMed ID

33230278

Citation

Callaway, Ewen. "Why Oxford's Positive COVID Vaccine Results Are Puzzling Scientists." Nature, vol. 588, no. 7836, 2020, pp. 16-18.
Callaway E. Why Oxford's positive COVID vaccine results are puzzling scientists. Nature. 2020;588(7836):16-18.
Callaway, E. (2020). Why Oxford's positive COVID vaccine results are puzzling scientists. Nature, 588(7836), 16-18. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-03326-w
Callaway E. Why Oxford's Positive COVID Vaccine Results Are Puzzling Scientists. Nature. 2020;588(7836):16-18. PubMed PMID: 33230278.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Why Oxford's positive COVID vaccine results are puzzling scientists. A1 - Callaway,Ewen, PY - 2020/11/25/pubmed PY - 2020/12/15/medline PY - 2020/11/24/entrez KW - SARS-CoV-2 KW - Vaccines SP - 16 EP - 18 JF - Nature JO - Nature VL - 588 IS - 7836 SN - 1476-4687 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/33230278/Why_Oxford's_positive_COVID_vaccine_results_are_puzzling_scientists_ DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -