Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Self-Reported Exposure to Secondhand Smoke and Support for Complete Smoking Bans in Multiunit Housing Among Smokers in the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom.
Prev Chronic Dis. 2020 11 25; 17:E147.PC

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Involuntary exposure to secondhand smoke most frequently occurs at home, which is problematic for residents of multiunit housing (MUH). The primary objective of this study was to estimate the extent of secondhand smoke incursions into the homes of MUH smokers who banned smoking in their homes but lived in buildings where smoking is allowed.

METHODS

We used data from Wave 9 of the International Tobacco Control Four Country Survey. We estimated 1) the prevalence of complete smoking bans among smokers living in single-family homes vs MUH in the United States (n = 3,208), Canada (n = 1,592), and the United Kingdom (n = 1,403) from 2013 to 2015; 2) the extent of secondhand smoke incursions into the homes of MUH smokers who banned smoking in their units but lived in buildings that allow smoking; and 3) MUH smokers' preferences for complete smoking bans in MUH. Weighted multivariable logistic regression estimated the country-specific adjusted prevalence of all outcomes.

RESULTS

Overall, 53.0% of smokers living in single-family homes completely banned smoking in their homes, compared with 44.8% of smokers in MUH. Across all 3 countries, only 27.8% of MUH smokers reported that smoking was completely prohibited in their building. A similar percentage of MUH smokers who banned smoking in their home but lived in buildings allowing smoking reported a secondhand smoke incursion into their home in the United States (29.9%; 95% CI, 20.4%-41.5%), Canada (38.4%; 95% CI, 26.7%-51.6%), and the United Kingdom (24.7%; 95% CI, 15.7%-36.7%). Across all 3 countries, 36.1% (95% CI, 33.4%-38.9%) of smokers in MUH reported they preferred a complete smoking ban in all building areas.

CONCLUSION

A need remains to educate MUH operators and residents about the benefits of comprehensive smoke-free policies.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Department of Psychology, University of Waterloo, 200 University Ave W, Waterloo, ON, Canada, N2L 3G1. Email: prdriezen@uwaterloo.ca.University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada. Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York.University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.King's College London, London, United Kingdom.Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Language

eng

PubMed ID

33241991

Citation

Driezen, Pete, et al. "Self-Reported Exposure to Secondhand Smoke and Support for Complete Smoking Bans in Multiunit Housing Among Smokers in the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom." Preventing Chronic Disease, vol. 17, 2020, pp. E147.
Driezen P, Fong GT, Hyland A, et al. Self-Reported Exposure to Secondhand Smoke and Support for Complete Smoking Bans in Multiunit Housing Among Smokers in the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom. Prev Chronic Dis. 2020;17:E147.
Driezen, P., Fong, G. T., Hyland, A., Craig, L. V., Sansone, G., Hitchman, S. C., & Cummings, K. M. (2020). Self-Reported Exposure to Secondhand Smoke and Support for Complete Smoking Bans in Multiunit Housing Among Smokers in the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom. Preventing Chronic Disease, 17, E147. https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd17.200201
Driezen P, et al. Self-Reported Exposure to Secondhand Smoke and Support for Complete Smoking Bans in Multiunit Housing Among Smokers in the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom. Prev Chronic Dis. 2020 11 25;17:E147. PubMed PMID: 33241991.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Self-Reported Exposure to Secondhand Smoke and Support for Complete Smoking Bans in Multiunit Housing Among Smokers in the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom. AU - Driezen,Pete, AU - Fong,Geoffrey T, AU - Hyland,Andrew, AU - Craig,Lorraine V, AU - Sansone,Genevieve, AU - Hitchman,Sara C, AU - Cummings,K Michael, Y1 - 2020/11/25/ PY - 2020/11/26/entrez PY - 2020/11/27/pubmed PY - 2021/8/17/medline SP - E147 EP - E147 JF - Preventing chronic disease JO - Prev Chronic Dis VL - 17 N2 - INTRODUCTION: Involuntary exposure to secondhand smoke most frequently occurs at home, which is problematic for residents of multiunit housing (MUH). The primary objective of this study was to estimate the extent of secondhand smoke incursions into the homes of MUH smokers who banned smoking in their homes but lived in buildings where smoking is allowed. METHODS: We used data from Wave 9 of the International Tobacco Control Four Country Survey. We estimated 1) the prevalence of complete smoking bans among smokers living in single-family homes vs MUH in the United States (n = 3,208), Canada (n = 1,592), and the United Kingdom (n = 1,403) from 2013 to 2015; 2) the extent of secondhand smoke incursions into the homes of MUH smokers who banned smoking in their units but lived in buildings that allow smoking; and 3) MUH smokers' preferences for complete smoking bans in MUH. Weighted multivariable logistic regression estimated the country-specific adjusted prevalence of all outcomes. RESULTS: Overall, 53.0% of smokers living in single-family homes completely banned smoking in their homes, compared with 44.8% of smokers in MUH. Across all 3 countries, only 27.8% of MUH smokers reported that smoking was completely prohibited in their building. A similar percentage of MUH smokers who banned smoking in their home but lived in buildings allowing smoking reported a secondhand smoke incursion into their home in the United States (29.9%; 95% CI, 20.4%-41.5%), Canada (38.4%; 95% CI, 26.7%-51.6%), and the United Kingdom (24.7%; 95% CI, 15.7%-36.7%). Across all 3 countries, 36.1% (95% CI, 33.4%-38.9%) of smokers in MUH reported they preferred a complete smoking ban in all building areas. CONCLUSION: A need remains to educate MUH operators and residents about the benefits of comprehensive smoke-free policies. SN - 1545-1151 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/33241991/Self_Reported_Exposure_to_Secondhand_Smoke_and_Support_for_Complete_Smoking_Bans_in_Multiunit_Housing_Among_Smokers_in_the_United_States_Canada_and_the_United_Kingdom_ L2 - https://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2020/20_0201.htm DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -