Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Pass-through of the Oakland, California, sugar-sweetened beverage tax in food stores two years post-implementation: A difference-in-differences study.
PLoS One. 2021; 16(1):e0244884.Plos

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Taxes on sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) have gained support as a policy response to adverse health effects associated with SSB consumption. On July 1, 2017, Oakland, California, implemented a one-cent/ounce tax on SSBs with ≥25 calories/12 fluid ounces. This study estimated the long-term impact of the tax on taxed and untaxed beverage prices.

METHODS

Data on 5,830 taxed and 5,146 untaxed beverage prices were obtained from 99 stores in Oakland and 111 stores in Sacramento (comparison site), California, in late May-June 2017 and June 2019. Linear regression difference-in-differences models were computed with store and product fixed effects, with robust standard errors clustered on store, weighted based on volume sold by beverage sweetener status, type, and size.

RESULTS

Taxed beverage prices increased by 0.73 cents/ounce (95% CI = 0.47,1.00) on average in supermarkets and grocery stores in Oakland relative to Sacramento and 0.74 cents/ounce (95% CI = 0.39,1.09) in pharmacies, but did not change in convenience stores (-0.09 cents/ounce, 95% CI = -0.56,0.39). Untaxed beverage prices overall increased by 0.40 cents/ounce (95% CI = 0.05,0.75) in pharmacies but did not change in other store types. Prices of taxed individual-size soda specifically increased in all store types, by 0.91-2.39 cents/ounce (p<0.05), as did prices of untaxed individual-size soda in convenience stores (0.79 cents/ounce, 95% CI = 0.01,1.56) and pharmacies (1.66 cents/ounce, 95% CI = 0.09,3.23).

CONCLUSIONS

Two years following SSB tax implementation, there was partial tax pass-through with differences by store type and by beverage type and size within store type.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Institute for Health Research and Policy, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.Division of Health Policy and Administration, School of Public Health, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.Institute for Health Research and Policy, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America. Division of Health Policy and Administration, School of Public Health, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Language

eng

PubMed ID

33395444

Citation

Leider, Julien, et al. "Pass-through of the Oakland, California, Sugar-sweetened Beverage Tax in Food Stores Two Years Post-implementation: a Difference-in-differences Study." PloS One, vol. 16, no. 1, 2021, pp. e0244884.
Leider J, Li Y, Powell LM. Pass-through of the Oakland, California, sugar-sweetened beverage tax in food stores two years post-implementation: A difference-in-differences study. PLoS One. 2021;16(1):e0244884.
Leider, J., Li, Y., & Powell, L. M. (2021). Pass-through of the Oakland, California, sugar-sweetened beverage tax in food stores two years post-implementation: A difference-in-differences study. PloS One, 16(1), e0244884. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244884
Leider J, Li Y, Powell LM. Pass-through of the Oakland, California, Sugar-sweetened Beverage Tax in Food Stores Two Years Post-implementation: a Difference-in-differences Study. PLoS One. 2021;16(1):e0244884. PubMed PMID: 33395444.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Pass-through of the Oakland, California, sugar-sweetened beverage tax in food stores two years post-implementation: A difference-in-differences study. AU - Leider,Julien, AU - Li,Yu, AU - Powell,Lisa M, Y1 - 2021/01/04/ PY - 2020/06/26/received PY - 2020/12/17/accepted PY - 2021/1/4/entrez PY - 2021/1/5/pubmed PY - 2021/5/11/medline SP - e0244884 EP - e0244884 JF - PloS one JO - PLoS One VL - 16 IS - 1 N2 - INTRODUCTION: Taxes on sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) have gained support as a policy response to adverse health effects associated with SSB consumption. On July 1, 2017, Oakland, California, implemented a one-cent/ounce tax on SSBs with ≥25 calories/12 fluid ounces. This study estimated the long-term impact of the tax on taxed and untaxed beverage prices. METHODS: Data on 5,830 taxed and 5,146 untaxed beverage prices were obtained from 99 stores in Oakland and 111 stores in Sacramento (comparison site), California, in late May-June 2017 and June 2019. Linear regression difference-in-differences models were computed with store and product fixed effects, with robust standard errors clustered on store, weighted based on volume sold by beverage sweetener status, type, and size. RESULTS: Taxed beverage prices increased by 0.73 cents/ounce (95% CI = 0.47,1.00) on average in supermarkets and grocery stores in Oakland relative to Sacramento and 0.74 cents/ounce (95% CI = 0.39,1.09) in pharmacies, but did not change in convenience stores (-0.09 cents/ounce, 95% CI = -0.56,0.39). Untaxed beverage prices overall increased by 0.40 cents/ounce (95% CI = 0.05,0.75) in pharmacies but did not change in other store types. Prices of taxed individual-size soda specifically increased in all store types, by 0.91-2.39 cents/ounce (p<0.05), as did prices of untaxed individual-size soda in convenience stores (0.79 cents/ounce, 95% CI = 0.01,1.56) and pharmacies (1.66 cents/ounce, 95% CI = 0.09,3.23). CONCLUSIONS: Two years following SSB tax implementation, there was partial tax pass-through with differences by store type and by beverage type and size within store type. SN - 1932-6203 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/33395444/Pass_through_of_the_Oakland_California_sugar_sweetened_beverage_tax_in_food_stores_two_years_post_implementation:_A_difference_in_differences_study_ DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -