TY - JOUR T1 - Evaluation of the Maternal-Fetal Triage Index in a tertiary care labor and delivery unit. AU - Kodama,Samantha, AU - Mokhtari,Neggin B, AU - Iqbal,Sara N, AU - Kawakita,Tetsuya, Y1 - 2021/03/20/ PY - 2021/02/02/received PY - 2021/03/03/revised PY - 2021/03/15/accepted PY - 2021/3/25/pubmed PY - 2021/9/11/medline PY - 2021/3/24/entrez KW - acuity KW - labor and delivery KW - obstetrical triage KW - quality improvement study KW - triage evaluation SP - 100351 EP - 100351 JF - American journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM JO - Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM VL - 3 IS - 4 N2 - BACKGROUND: The Maternal-Fetal Triage Index is a 5-level system to facilitate the care of pregnant women seeking care in an obstetrical triage unit (priority 1 being the highest acuity and priority 5 being the lowest acuity). Although the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommends implementing labor and delivery triage tools, it remains unclear whether the Maternal-Fetal Triage Index facilitates the timely evaluation of high-acuity pregnant women. OBJECTIVE: We sought to examine the duration of a labor and delivery triage evaluation before and after the implementation of the Maternal-Fetal Triage Index. We also sought to examine the duration of a labor and delivery triage evaluation according to priority levels by the Maternal-Fetal Triage Index. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective quality improvement study of all women presenting to an urban, tertiary labor and delivery triage unit at 16 weeks' gestation or later from December 2017 to February 2018 (historical cohort) and December 2018 to February 2019 (study cohort). As part of a quality improvement initiative, the Maternal-Fetal Triage Index was implemented in the labor and delivery unit in May 2018. All registered nurses who worked in the labor and delivery unit completed a formal education course and assigned the priority levels at the time of triage presentation. The primary outcome was the duration of a labor and delivery triage evaluation, which was defined as the time interval from triage presentation to the completion of history and physical examination in the electronic medical record. Secondary outcomes included the rates of labor and delivery unit admissions. RESULTS: There were 1305 and 1374 women in the historical cohort and study cohort, respectively. The duration of labor and delivery triage evaluation was longer for the study cohort than for the historical cohort (64 minutes vs 61 minutes; P=.02). Of the 1374 women in the study cohort, there were 28 (2%), 290 (21%), 459 (33%), 462 (34%), and 135 (10%) women with priority levels 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 assigned, respectively. Women with a higher priority according to the Maternal-Fetal Triage Index had a shorter labor and delivery triage evaluation (priority 1, 57 minutes; priority 2, 66 minutes; priority 3, 63 minutes; priority 4, 62 minutes; and priority 5, 83 minutes; P<.001). The rates of admission were higher in the priority 1 and 5 groups (priority 1, 89.3%; priority 2, 41.4%; priority 3, 57.3%; priority 4, 53.3%; and priority 5, 92.6%; P<.001). CONCLUSION: Compared with the historical cohort, the duration of labor and delivery triage evaluation was longer in the study cohort. However, in the study cohort, women classified as higher priority according to the Maternal-Fetal Triage Index had a shorter labor and delivery triage evaluation. Our study supports the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' recommendation on the implementation and utilization of labor and delivery triage tools such as the Maternal-Fetal Triage Index. SN - 2589-9333 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/33757932/Evaluation_of_the_Maternal_Fetal_Triage_Index_in_a_tertiary_care_labor_and_delivery_unit_ DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -