Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Does the assessment of different combinations of within-phase subjective measures influence electrodermal responding and between-phase subjective ratings during fear conditioning and extinction experiments?
Biol Psychol. 2021 05; 162:108085.BP

Abstract

The type and number of dependent measures assessed have varied between fear conditioning and extinction experiments and it remains unclear whether methodological differences influence results. Measuring skin conductance responses (SCRs) and between-phase subjective ratings between four conditions; Con condition had no within-phase ratings; US Exp condition included within-phase US expectancy ratings only; CS Eval condition included within-phase CS evaluations only and All Meas condition included both. All Meas condition exhibited larger SCRs compared to other conditions during acquisition, extinction, and return of differential responding at test. Differential SCRs did not extinguish in CS Eval and Con conditions, and CS Eval condition exhibited smaller CS- SCRs than other conditions throughout phases. US Exp condition revealed differential conditioning, successful extinction, and no return of differential SCRs. Between-phase ratings were not affected by within-phase ratings. Researchers should consider assessing different combinations of within-phase subjective ratings depending on the aims of their research.

Links

Publisher Full Text (DOI)

Authors+Show Affiliations

Ryan KM
School of Applied Psychology, Griffith University, Australia. Electronic address: k.ryan@griffith.edu.au.
Neumann DL
School of Applied Psychology, Griffith University, Australia.
Waters AM
School of Applied Psychology, Griffith University, Australia. Electronic address: a.waters@griffith.edu.au.

MeSH

Conditioning, ClassicalExtinction, PsychologicalFearGalvanic Skin ResponseHumans

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

33775735

Citation

Ryan, Katherine M., et al. "Does the Assessment of Different Combinations of Within-phase Subjective Measures Influence Electrodermal Responding and Between-phase Subjective Ratings During Fear Conditioning and Extinction Experiments?" Biological Psychology, vol. 162, 2021, p. 108085.
Ryan KM, Neumann DL, Waters AM. Does the assessment of different combinations of within-phase subjective measures influence electrodermal responding and between-phase subjective ratings during fear conditioning and extinction experiments? Biol Psychol. 2021;162:108085.
Ryan, K. M., Neumann, D. L., & Waters, A. M. (2021). Does the assessment of different combinations of within-phase subjective measures influence electrodermal responding and between-phase subjective ratings during fear conditioning and extinction experiments? Biological Psychology, 162, 108085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2021.108085
Ryan KM, Neumann DL, Waters AM. Does the Assessment of Different Combinations of Within-phase Subjective Measures Influence Electrodermal Responding and Between-phase Subjective Ratings During Fear Conditioning and Extinction Experiments. Biol Psychol. 2021;162:108085. PubMed PMID: 33775735.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Does the assessment of different combinations of within-phase subjective measures influence electrodermal responding and between-phase subjective ratings during fear conditioning and extinction experiments? AU - Ryan,Katherine M, AU - Neumann,David L, AU - Waters,Allison M, Y1 - 2021/03/26/ PY - 2020/08/12/received PY - 2021/03/21/revised PY - 2021/03/22/accepted PY - 2021/3/30/pubmed PY - 2021/7/13/medline PY - 2021/3/29/entrez KW - CS evaluations KW - Dependent measures KW - Electrodermal responding KW - Fear conditioning KW - Fear extinction KW - Skin conductance responses KW - Subjective anxiety ratings KW - US expectancy ratings SP - 108085 EP - 108085 JF - Biological psychology JO - Biol Psychol VL - 162 N2 - The type and number of dependent measures assessed have varied between fear conditioning and extinction experiments and it remains unclear whether methodological differences influence results. Measuring skin conductance responses (SCRs) and between-phase subjective ratings between four conditions; Con condition had no within-phase ratings; US Exp condition included within-phase US expectancy ratings only; CS Eval condition included within-phase CS evaluations only and All Meas condition included both. All Meas condition exhibited larger SCRs compared to other conditions during acquisition, extinction, and return of differential responding at test. Differential SCRs did not extinguish in CS Eval and Con conditions, and CS Eval condition exhibited smaller CS- SCRs than other conditions throughout phases. US Exp condition revealed differential conditioning, successful extinction, and no return of differential SCRs. Between-phase ratings were not affected by within-phase ratings. Researchers should consider assessing different combinations of within-phase subjective ratings depending on the aims of their research. SN - 1873-6246 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/33775735/Does_the_assessment_of_different_combinations_of_within_phase_subjective_measures_influence_electrodermal_responding_and_between_phase_subjective_ratings_during_fear_conditioning_and_extinction_experiments DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -