Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Association Between Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Inhibitors and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 03 01; 4(3):e213594.JN

Abstract

Importance

The chronic receipt of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) has been assumed to exacerbate complications associated with COVID-19 and produce worse clinical outcomes.

Objective

To conduct an updated and comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis comparing mortality and severe adverse events (AEs) associated with receipt vs nonreceipt of ACEIs or ARBs among patients with COVID-19.

Data Sources

PubMed and Embase databases were systematically searched from December 31, 2019, until September 1, 2020.

Study Selection

The meta-analysis included any study design, with the exception of narrative reviews or opinion-based articles, in which COVID-19 was diagnosed through laboratory or radiological test results and in which clinical outcomes (unadjusted or adjusted) associated with COVID-19 were assessed among adult patients (≥18 years) receiving ACEIs or ARBs.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

Three authors independently extracted data on mortality and severe AEs associated with COVID-19. Severe AEs were defined as intensive care unit admission or the need for assisted ventilation. For each outcome, a random-effects model was used to compare the odds ratio (OR) between patients receiving ACEIs or ARBs vs those not receiving ACEIs or ARBs.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Unadjusted and adjusted ORs for mortality and severe AEs associated with COVID-19.

Results

A total of 1788 records from the PubMed and Embase databases were identified; after removal of duplicates, 1664 records were screened, and 71 articles underwent full-text evaluation. Clinical data were pooled from 52 eligible studies (40 cohort studies, 6 case series, 4 case-control studies, 1 randomized clinical trial, and 1 cross-sectional study) enrolling 101 949 total patients, of whom 26 545 (26.0%) were receiving ACEIs or ARBs. When adjusted for covariates, significant reductions in the risk of death (adjusted OR [aOR], 0.57; 95% CI, 0.43-0.76; P < .001) and severe AEs (aOR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.53-0.88; P < .001) were found. Unadjusted and adjusted analyses of a subgroup of patients with hypertension indicated decreases in the risk of death (unadjusted OR, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.49-0.91]; P = .01; aOR, 0.51 [95% CI, 0.32-0.84]; P = .008) and severe AEs (unadjusted OR, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.54-0.91]; P = .007; aOR, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.36-0.85]; P = .007).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, receipt of ACEIs or ARBs was not associated with a higher risk of multivariable-adjusted mortality and severe AEs among patients with COVID-19 who had either hypertension or multiple comorbidities, supporting the recommendations of medical societies. On the contrary, ACEIs and ARBs may be associated with protective benefits, particularly among patients with hypertension. Future randomized clinical trials are warranted to establish causality.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Department of Cardiology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, United Kingdom. Department of Cardiology, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom.Department of Cardiology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, United Kingdom.Department of Cardiology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, United Kingdom.National Health Service 111 COVID-19 Clinical Assessment Service, Bicester, United Kingdom. Neasden Medical Centre, London, United Kingdom. Healix International, Esher, United Kingdom.Department of Cardiology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, United Kingdom. Department of Cardiology, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom.Department of Medical Statistics, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom.Department of Cardiology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, United Kingdom. Department of Cardiology, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom.

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Systematic Review

Language

eng

PubMed ID

33787911

Citation

Baral, Ranu, et al. "Association Between Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Inhibitors and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With COVID-19: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis." JAMA Network Open, vol. 4, no. 3, 2021, pp. e213594.
Baral R, Tsampasian V, Debski M, et al. Association Between Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Inhibitors and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(3):e213594.
Baral, R., Tsampasian, V., Debski, M., Moran, B., Garg, P., Clark, A., & Vassiliou, V. S. (2021). Association Between Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Inhibitors and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Network Open, 4(3), e213594. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.3594
Baral R, et al. Association Between Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Inhibitors and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With COVID-19: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2021 03 1;4(3):e213594. PubMed PMID: 33787911.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Association Between Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Inhibitors and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. AU - Baral,Ranu, AU - Tsampasian,Vasiliki, AU - Debski,Maciej, AU - Moran,Brendan, AU - Garg,Pankaj, AU - Clark,Allan, AU - Vassiliou,Vassilios S, Y1 - 2021/03/01/ PY - 2021/3/31/entrez PY - 2021/4/1/pubmed PY - 2021/4/10/medline SP - e213594 EP - e213594 JF - JAMA network open JO - JAMA Netw Open VL - 4 IS - 3 N2 - Importance: The chronic receipt of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) has been assumed to exacerbate complications associated with COVID-19 and produce worse clinical outcomes. Objective: To conduct an updated and comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis comparing mortality and severe adverse events (AEs) associated with receipt vs nonreceipt of ACEIs or ARBs among patients with COVID-19. Data Sources: PubMed and Embase databases were systematically searched from December 31, 2019, until September 1, 2020. Study Selection: The meta-analysis included any study design, with the exception of narrative reviews or opinion-based articles, in which COVID-19 was diagnosed through laboratory or radiological test results and in which clinical outcomes (unadjusted or adjusted) associated with COVID-19 were assessed among adult patients (≥18 years) receiving ACEIs or ARBs. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Three authors independently extracted data on mortality and severe AEs associated with COVID-19. Severe AEs were defined as intensive care unit admission or the need for assisted ventilation. For each outcome, a random-effects model was used to compare the odds ratio (OR) between patients receiving ACEIs or ARBs vs those not receiving ACEIs or ARBs. Main Outcomes and Measures: Unadjusted and adjusted ORs for mortality and severe AEs associated with COVID-19. Results: A total of 1788 records from the PubMed and Embase databases were identified; after removal of duplicates, 1664 records were screened, and 71 articles underwent full-text evaluation. Clinical data were pooled from 52 eligible studies (40 cohort studies, 6 case series, 4 case-control studies, 1 randomized clinical trial, and 1 cross-sectional study) enrolling 101 949 total patients, of whom 26 545 (26.0%) were receiving ACEIs or ARBs. When adjusted for covariates, significant reductions in the risk of death (adjusted OR [aOR], 0.57; 95% CI, 0.43-0.76; P < .001) and severe AEs (aOR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.53-0.88; P < .001) were found. Unadjusted and adjusted analyses of a subgroup of patients with hypertension indicated decreases in the risk of death (unadjusted OR, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.49-0.91]; P = .01; aOR, 0.51 [95% CI, 0.32-0.84]; P = .008) and severe AEs (unadjusted OR, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.54-0.91]; P = .007; aOR, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.36-0.85]; P = .007). Conclusions and Relevance: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, receipt of ACEIs or ARBs was not associated with a higher risk of multivariable-adjusted mortality and severe AEs among patients with COVID-19 who had either hypertension or multiple comorbidities, supporting the recommendations of medical societies. On the contrary, ACEIs and ARBs may be associated with protective benefits, particularly among patients with hypertension. Future randomized clinical trials are warranted to establish causality. SN - 2574-3805 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/33787911/Association_Between_Renin_Angiotensin_Aldosterone_System_Inhibitors_and_Clinical_Outcomes_in_Patients_With_COVID_19:_A_Systematic_Review_and_Meta_analysis_ DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -