Citation
Matsuzaki, Nanako, et al. "Evaluation of a Chemiluminescent Enzyme Immunoassay-based High-throughput SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Assay for the Diagnosis of COVID-19: the VITROS® SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Test." Journal of Medical Virology, vol. 93, no. 12, 2021, pp. 6778-6781.
Matsuzaki N, Orihara Y, Kodana M, et al. Evaluation of a chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay-based high-throughput SARS-CoV-2 antigen assay for the diagnosis of COVID-19: The VITROS® SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Test. J Med Virol. 2021;93(12):6778-6781.
Matsuzaki, N., Orihara, Y., Kodana, M., Kitagawa, Y., Matsuoka, M., Kawamura, R., Takeuchi, S., Imai, K., Tarumoto, N., Maesaki, S., & Maeda, T. (2021). Evaluation of a chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay-based high-throughput SARS-CoV-2 antigen assay for the diagnosis of COVID-19: The VITROS® SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Test. Journal of Medical Virology, 93(12), 6778-6781. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.27153
Matsuzaki N, et al. Evaluation of a Chemiluminescent Enzyme Immunoassay-based High-throughput SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Assay for the Diagnosis of COVID-19: the VITROS® SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Test. J Med Virol. 2021;93(12):6778-6781. PubMed PMID: 34170555.
TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluation of a chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay-based high-throughput SARS-CoV-2 antigen assay for the diagnosis of COVID-19: The VITROS® SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Test.
AU - Matsuzaki,Nanako,
AU - Orihara,Yuta,
AU - Kodana,Masahiro,
AU - Kitagawa,Yutaro,
AU - Matsuoka,Masaru,
AU - Kawamura,Rieko,
AU - Takeuchi,Shinichi,
AU - Imai,Kazuo,
AU - Tarumoto,Norihito,
AU - Maesaki,Shigefumi,
AU - Maeda,Takuya,
Y1 - 2021/08/12/
PY - 2021/06/17/received
PY - 2021/06/21/accepted
PY - 2021/6/26/pubmed
PY - 2021/10/28/medline
PY - 2021/6/25/entrez
KW - CLEIA
KW - COVID-19
KW - RT-qPCR
KW - SARS-CoV-2
KW - nasopharyngeal swab
SP - 6778
EP - 6781
JF - Journal of medical virology
JO - J Med Virol
VL - 93
IS - 12
N2 - A high-throughput, fully automated antigen detection test for SARS-CoV-2 is a viable alternative to reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) for mass screening during outbreaks. In this study, we compared RT-qPCR for viral load and the VITROS® SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Test with reference to the results of the LUMIPULSE® SARS-CoV-2 Ag Test. Of 128 nasopharyngeal swab specimens taken from patients suspected of being infected with SARS-CoV-2, 49 were positive and 79 were negative according to RT-qPCR. Consistent dose-dependent detection with VITROS® assay was successfully achieved when using nasopharyngeal swab specimens with Ct values of 32.0 or lesser, whereas the CLEIA-based LUMIPULSE® assay was able to detect lower viral loads compared with the VITROS® assay. Our results show that the performance of the VITROS® assay was satisfactory for the diagnosis of contagious COVID-19 patients in the clinical setting. Highlights The performance of the VITROS® SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Test was sufficient for the diagnosis of contagious COVID-19. This test showed high sensitivity and specificity in the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in samples with a Ct value of 32 or less.
SN - 1096-9071
UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/34170555/Evaluation_of_a_chemiluminescent_enzyme_immunoassay_based_high_throughput_SARS_CoV_2_antigen_assay_for_the_diagnosis_of_COVID_19:_The_VITROS®_SARS_CoV_2_Antigen_Test_
L2 - https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.27153
DB - PRIME
DP - Unbound Medicine
ER -