Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Use of briefing and debriefing in neonatal resuscitation, a scoping review.
Resusc Plus. 2021 Mar; 5:100059.RP

Abstract

AIM

To review the literature on briefing and debriefing in neonatal resuscitation using International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) methodology to see if a formal systematic review is justified.

METHODS

This scoping review was undertaken by an ILCOR Newborn Life Support scoping review team and guided by the ILCOR methodological framework and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Studies were eligible for inclusion if they were peer-reviewed, compared briefing/debriefing of healthcare professionals who had completed a neonatal resuscitation or simulated resuscitation and reported outcomes for infants, families or staff. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases were searched.

RESULTS

This review included four studies that reported on three briefing/debriefing interventions: video debriefing, the use of checklists with a briefing/debriefing component and rapid cycle deliberate practice. Video debriefing was associated with improvements in the process of care and adherence to resuscitation guidelines. Use of checklists was associated with improvements in short term clinical outcomes and a reduction in communication problems. Rapid cycle deliberate practice may lead to short but not sustained improvements in algorithm compliance and timely completion of resuscitation steps.

CONCLUSION

This scoping review did not identify sufficient new evidence to justify conducting new systematic reviews or review of current resuscitation guidelines. Improvements in the process of care, short term clinical outcomes and reduction in communication problems were associated with briefing/debriefing supported by video, checklists or rapid, cycle deliberate practice. It highlights knowledge gaps, including the need to consider briefing/debriefing separately from other interventions, the effect of briefing/debriefing on short- and long-term clinical outcomes and the effect of rapid cycle deliberate practice on resuscitation training.

Authors+Show Affiliations

University Hospitals Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK.Stanford University Library, CA, USA.Stanford University School of Medicine, Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, CA, USA.

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article
Review

Language

eng

PubMed ID

34223331

Citation

Fawke, Joe, et al. "Use of Briefing and Debriefing in Neonatal Resuscitation, a Scoping Review." Resuscitation Plus, vol. 5, 2021, p. 100059.
Fawke J, Stave C, Yamada N. Use of briefing and debriefing in neonatal resuscitation, a scoping review. Resusc Plus. 2021;5:100059.
Fawke, J., Stave, C., & Yamada, N. (2021). Use of briefing and debriefing in neonatal resuscitation, a scoping review. Resuscitation Plus, 5, 100059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resplu.2020.100059
Fawke J, Stave C, Yamada N. Use of Briefing and Debriefing in Neonatal Resuscitation, a Scoping Review. Resusc Plus. 2021;5:100059. PubMed PMID: 34223331.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Use of briefing and debriefing in neonatal resuscitation, a scoping review. AU - Fawke,Joe, AU - Stave,Christopher, AU - Yamada,Nicole, Y1 - 2020/12/25/ PY - 2020/09/09/received PY - 2020/10/22/revised PY - 2020/11/28/accepted PY - 2021/7/5/entrez PY - 2021/7/6/pubmed PY - 2021/7/6/medline KW - Neonatal CPR KW - Neonatal advanced life support KW - Neonatal basic life support KW - Neonatal cardiopulmonary resuscitation KW - Neonatal resuscitation KW - Scoping review SP - 100059 EP - 100059 JF - Resuscitation plus JO - Resusc Plus VL - 5 N2 - AIM: To review the literature on briefing and debriefing in neonatal resuscitation using International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) methodology to see if a formal systematic review is justified. METHODS: This scoping review was undertaken by an ILCOR Newborn Life Support scoping review team and guided by the ILCOR methodological framework and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Studies were eligible for inclusion if they were peer-reviewed, compared briefing/debriefing of healthcare professionals who had completed a neonatal resuscitation or simulated resuscitation and reported outcomes for infants, families or staff. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases were searched. RESULTS: This review included four studies that reported on three briefing/debriefing interventions: video debriefing, the use of checklists with a briefing/debriefing component and rapid cycle deliberate practice. Video debriefing was associated with improvements in the process of care and adherence to resuscitation guidelines. Use of checklists was associated with improvements in short term clinical outcomes and a reduction in communication problems. Rapid cycle deliberate practice may lead to short but not sustained improvements in algorithm compliance and timely completion of resuscitation steps. CONCLUSION: This scoping review did not identify sufficient new evidence to justify conducting new systematic reviews or review of current resuscitation guidelines. Improvements in the process of care, short term clinical outcomes and reduction in communication problems were associated with briefing/debriefing supported by video, checklists or rapid, cycle deliberate practice. It highlights knowledge gaps, including the need to consider briefing/debriefing separately from other interventions, the effect of briefing/debriefing on short- and long-term clinical outcomes and the effect of rapid cycle deliberate practice on resuscitation training. SN - 2666-5204 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/34223331/Use_of_briefing_and_debriefing_in_neonatal_resuscitation_a_scoping_review_ L2 - https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2666-5204(20)30060-6 DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -