Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Outcomes of a Community-Based Participatory Research Partnership Self-Evaluation: The Rochester Healthy Community Partnership Experience.
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2021; 15(2):161-175.PC

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Community-based participatory research (CBPR) can effectively address health disparities among groups that are historically difficult to reach, disadvantaged, of a minority status, or are otherwise underrepresented in research. Recent research has focused on the science of CBPR partnership constructs and on developing and testing tools for self-evaluation. Because CBPR requires substantial investment in human and material resources, specific factors that support successful and sustainable research partnerships must be identified. We sought to describe the evolution, implementation, and results of a self-evaluation of a CBPR partnership.

METHODS

Academic and community members of the Rochester Healthy Community Partnership (RHCP) and researchers from the University of New Mexico-Center for Participatory Research collaborated to evaluate RHCP with qualitative and quantitative research methods and group analysis.

RESULTS

The self-evaluation was used to provide an overall picture of the "health" of the partnership, in terms of sustainability and ability to effectively collaborate around community priorities. RHCP members revisited the partnership's mission and values; identified associations between partnership practices, dynamics, and outcomes; and elicited insight from community and academic partners to help guide decisions about future directions and the sustainability of the partnership. Positive partnership dynamics were associated with perceived improvements in health and equity outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Although engaging in a comprehensive self-evaluation requires substantial investment from stakeholders, such assessments have significant value because they enable partners to reflect on the mission and values of the partnership, explore the history and context for its existence, identify factors that have contributed to outcomes, and plan strategically for the future.

Authors

No affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Language

eng

PubMed ID

34248061

Citation

Hanza, Marcelo M., et al. "Outcomes of a Community-Based Participatory Research Partnership Self-Evaluation: the Rochester Healthy Community Partnership Experience." Progress in Community Health Partnerships : Research, Education, and Action, vol. 15, no. 2, 2021, pp. 161-175.
Hanza MM, Reese AL, Abbenyi A, et al. Outcomes of a Community-Based Participatory Research Partnership Self-Evaluation: The Rochester Healthy Community Partnership Experience. Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2021;15(2):161-175.
Hanza, M. M., Reese, A. L., Abbenyi, A., Formea, C., Njeru, J. W., Nigon, J. A., Meiers, S. J., Weis, J. A., Sussman, A. L., Boursaw, B., Wallerstein, N. B., Wieland, M. L., & Sia, I. G. (2021). Outcomes of a Community-Based Participatory Research Partnership Self-Evaluation: The Rochester Healthy Community Partnership Experience. Progress in Community Health Partnerships : Research, Education, and Action, 15(2), 161-175. https://doi.org/10.1353/cpr.2021.0019
Hanza MM, et al. Outcomes of a Community-Based Participatory Research Partnership Self-Evaluation: the Rochester Healthy Community Partnership Experience. Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2021;15(2):161-175. PubMed PMID: 34248061.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Outcomes of a Community-Based Participatory Research Partnership Self-Evaluation: The Rochester Healthy Community Partnership Experience. AU - Hanza,Marcelo M, AU - Reese,Abigail L, AU - Abbenyi,Adeline, AU - Formea,Christine, AU - Njeru,Jane W, AU - Nigon,Julie A, AU - Meiers,Sonja J, AU - Weis,Jennifer A, AU - Sussman,Andrew L, AU - Boursaw,Blake, AU - Wallerstein,Nina B, AU - Wieland,Mark L, AU - Sia,Irene G, PY - 2021/7/12/entrez PY - 2021/7/13/pubmed PY - 2021/10/29/medline SP - 161 EP - 175 JF - Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action JO - Prog Community Health Partnersh VL - 15 IS - 2 N2 - BACKGROUND: Community-based participatory research (CBPR) can effectively address health disparities among groups that are historically difficult to reach, disadvantaged, of a minority status, or are otherwise underrepresented in research. Recent research has focused on the science of CBPR partnership constructs and on developing and testing tools for self-evaluation. Because CBPR requires substantial investment in human and material resources, specific factors that support successful and sustainable research partnerships must be identified. We sought to describe the evolution, implementation, and results of a self-evaluation of a CBPR partnership. METHODS: Academic and community members of the Rochester Healthy Community Partnership (RHCP) and researchers from the University of New Mexico-Center for Participatory Research collaborated to evaluate RHCP with qualitative and quantitative research methods and group analysis. RESULTS: The self-evaluation was used to provide an overall picture of the "health" of the partnership, in terms of sustainability and ability to effectively collaborate around community priorities. RHCP members revisited the partnership's mission and values; identified associations between partnership practices, dynamics, and outcomes; and elicited insight from community and academic partners to help guide decisions about future directions and the sustainability of the partnership. Positive partnership dynamics were associated with perceived improvements in health and equity outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Although engaging in a comprehensive self-evaluation requires substantial investment from stakeholders, such assessments have significant value because they enable partners to reflect on the mission and values of the partnership, explore the history and context for its existence, identify factors that have contributed to outcomes, and plan strategically for the future. SN - 1557-055X UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/34248061/Outcomes_of_a_Community_Based_Participatory_Research_Partnership_Self_Evaluation:_The_Rochester_Healthy_Community_Partnership_Experience_ DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -