Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Symptom Persistence Despite Improvement in Cardiopulmonary Health - Insights from longitudinal CMR, CPET and lung function testing post-COVID-19.
EClinicalMedicine. 2021 Nov; 41:101159.E

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The longitudinal trajectories of cardiopulmonary abnormalities and symptoms following infection with coronavirus disease (COVID-19) are unclear. We sought to describe their natural history in previously hospitalised patients, compare this with controls, and assess the relationship between symptoms and cardiopulmonary impairment at 6 months post-COVID-19.

METHODS

Fifty-eight patients and thirty matched controls (single visit), recruited between 14th March - 25th May 2020, underwent symptom-questionnaires, cardiac and lung magnetic resonance imaging (CMR), cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET), and spirometry at 3 months following COVID-19. Of them, forty-six patients returned for follow-up assessments at 6 months.

FINDINGS

At 2-3 months, 83% of patients had at least one cardiopulmonary symptom versus 33% of controls. Patients and controls had comparable biventricular volumes and function. Native cardiac T1 (marker of fibroinflammation) and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE, marker of focal fibrosis) were increased in patients at 2-3 months. Sixty percent of patients had lung parenchymal abnormalities on CMR and 55% had reduced peak oxygen consumption (pV̇O2) on CPET. By 6 months, 52% of patients remained symptomatic. On CMR, indexed right ventricular (RV) end-diastolic volume (-4·3 mls/m2, P=0·005) decreased and RV ejection fraction (+3·2%, P=0·0003) increased. Native T1 and LGE improved and was comparable to controls. Lung parenchymal abnormalities and peak V̇O2, although better, were abnormal in patients versus controls. 31% had reduced pV̇O2 secondary to symptomatic limitation and muscular impairment. Cardiopulmonary symptoms in patients did not associate with CMR, lung function, or CPET measures.

INTERPRETATION

In patients, cardiopulmonary abnormalities improve over time, though some measures remain abnormal relative to controls. Persistent symptoms at 6 months post-COVID-19 did not associate with objective measures of cardiopulmonary health.

FUNDING

The authors' work was supported by the NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford British Heart Foundation (BHF) Centre of Research Excellence (RE/18/3/34214), United Kingdom Research Innovation and Wellcome Trust. This project is part of a tier 3 study (C-MORE) within the collaborative research programme entitled PHOSP-COVID Post-hospitalization COVID-19 study: a national consortium to understand and improve long-term health outcomes, funded by the Medical Research Council and Department of Health and Social Care/National Institute for Health Research Grant (MR/V027859/1) ISRCTN number 10980107.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Oxford Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom. Department of Cardiology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom.Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Oxford Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom. Department of Respiratory Medicine, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom.Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Oxford Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.Radcliffe Department of Medicine, British Heart Foundation Centre for Research Excellence, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom. Department of Radiology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom.Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Oxford Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom. Department of Cardiology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom.Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Oxford Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom. Department of Cardiology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom.NIHR Biomedical Research Centre (Respiratory theme), University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK. Department of Respiratory Science, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.NIHR Biomedical Research Centre (Respiratory theme), University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK. Department of Respiratory Science, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom. Department of Respiratory Medicine, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom.Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Oxford Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom. Department of Respiratory Medicine, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom.Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom. Department of Respiratory Medicine, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom.Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Oxford Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom. Department of Cardiology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom.Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Oxford Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom. Department of Cardiology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom. Radcliffe Department of Medicine, British Heart Foundation Centre for Research Excellence, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Oxford Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom. Department of Cardiology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom. Radcliffe Department of Medicine, British Heart Foundation Centre for Research Excellence, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

34693230

Citation

Cassar, Mark Philip, et al. "Symptom Persistence Despite Improvement in Cardiopulmonary Health - Insights From Longitudinal CMR, CPET and Lung Function Testing Post-COVID-19." EClinicalMedicine, vol. 41, 2021, p. 101159.
Cassar MP, Tunnicliffe EM, Petousi N, et al. Symptom Persistence Despite Improvement in Cardiopulmonary Health - Insights from longitudinal CMR, CPET and lung function testing post-COVID-19. EClinicalMedicine. 2021;41:101159.
Cassar, M. P., Tunnicliffe, E. M., Petousi, N., Lewandowski, A. J., Xie, C., Mahmod, M., Samat, A. H. A., Evans, R. A., Brightling, C. E., Ho, L. P., Piechnik, S. K., Talbot, N. P., Holdsworth, D., Ferreira, V. M., Neubauer, S., & Raman, B. (2021). Symptom Persistence Despite Improvement in Cardiopulmonary Health - Insights from longitudinal CMR, CPET and lung function testing post-COVID-19. EClinicalMedicine, 41, 101159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101159
Cassar MP, et al. Symptom Persistence Despite Improvement in Cardiopulmonary Health - Insights From Longitudinal CMR, CPET and Lung Function Testing Post-COVID-19. EClinicalMedicine. 2021;41:101159. PubMed PMID: 34693230.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Symptom Persistence Despite Improvement in Cardiopulmonary Health - Insights from longitudinal CMR, CPET and lung function testing post-COVID-19. AU - Cassar,Mark Philip, AU - Tunnicliffe,Elizabeth M, AU - Petousi,Nayia, AU - Lewandowski,Adam J, AU - Xie,Cheng, AU - Mahmod,Masliza, AU - Samat,Azlan Helmy Abd, AU - Evans,Rachael A, AU - Brightling,Christopher E, AU - Ho,Ling-Pei, AU - Piechnik,Stefan K, AU - Talbot,Nick P, AU - Holdsworth,David, AU - Ferreira,Vanessa M, AU - Neubauer,Stefan, AU - Raman,Betty, Y1 - 2021/10/20/ PY - 2021/07/28/received PY - 2021/09/25/revised PY - 2021/09/27/accepted PY - 2021/10/26/pubmed PY - 2021/10/26/medline PY - 2021/10/25/entrez KW - CMR KW - COVID-19 KW - CPET KW - SARS-CoV-2 KW - long COVID SP - 101159 EP - 101159 JF - EClinicalMedicine JO - EClinicalMedicine VL - 41 N2 - BACKGROUND: The longitudinal trajectories of cardiopulmonary abnormalities and symptoms following infection with coronavirus disease (COVID-19) are unclear. We sought to describe their natural history in previously hospitalised patients, compare this with controls, and assess the relationship between symptoms and cardiopulmonary impairment at 6 months post-COVID-19. METHODS: Fifty-eight patients and thirty matched controls (single visit), recruited between 14th March - 25th May 2020, underwent symptom-questionnaires, cardiac and lung magnetic resonance imaging (CMR), cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET), and spirometry at 3 months following COVID-19. Of them, forty-six patients returned for follow-up assessments at 6 months. FINDINGS: At 2-3 months, 83% of patients had at least one cardiopulmonary symptom versus 33% of controls. Patients and controls had comparable biventricular volumes and function. Native cardiac T1 (marker of fibroinflammation) and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE, marker of focal fibrosis) were increased in patients at 2-3 months. Sixty percent of patients had lung parenchymal abnormalities on CMR and 55% had reduced peak oxygen consumption (pV̇O2) on CPET. By 6 months, 52% of patients remained symptomatic. On CMR, indexed right ventricular (RV) end-diastolic volume (-4·3 mls/m2, P=0·005) decreased and RV ejection fraction (+3·2%, P=0·0003) increased. Native T1 and LGE improved and was comparable to controls. Lung parenchymal abnormalities and peak V̇O2, although better, were abnormal in patients versus controls. 31% had reduced pV̇O2 secondary to symptomatic limitation and muscular impairment. Cardiopulmonary symptoms in patients did not associate with CMR, lung function, or CPET measures. INTERPRETATION: In patients, cardiopulmonary abnormalities improve over time, though some measures remain abnormal relative to controls. Persistent symptoms at 6 months post-COVID-19 did not associate with objective measures of cardiopulmonary health. FUNDING: The authors' work was supported by the NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford British Heart Foundation (BHF) Centre of Research Excellence (RE/18/3/34214), United Kingdom Research Innovation and Wellcome Trust. This project is part of a tier 3 study (C-MORE) within the collaborative research programme entitled PHOSP-COVID Post-hospitalization COVID-19 study: a national consortium to understand and improve long-term health outcomes, funded by the Medical Research Council and Department of Health and Social Care/National Institute for Health Research Grant (MR/V027859/1) ISRCTN number 10980107. SN - 2589-5370 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/34693230/Symptom_Persistence_Despite_Improvement_in_Cardiopulmonary_Health___Insights_from_longitudinal_CMR_CPET_and_lung_function_testing_post_COVID_19_ DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -