Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Effect of acupuncture and metformin on insulin sensitivity in women with polycystic ovary syndrome and insulin resistance: a three-armed randomized controlled trial.
Hum Reprod. 2022 Mar 01; 37(3):542-552.HR

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION

Does acupuncture improve insulin sensitivity more effectively than metformin or sham acupuncture in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and insulin resistance (IR)?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Among women with PCOS and IR, acupuncture was not more effective than metformin or sham acupuncture in improving insulin sensitivity.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Uncontrolled trials have shown that acupuncture improved insulin sensitivity with fewer side effects compared with metformin in women with PCOS and IR. However, data from randomized trials between acupuncture and metformin or sham acupuncture are lacking.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

This was a three-armed randomized controlled trial enrolling a total of 342 women with PCOS and IR from three hospitals between November 2015 and February 2018, with a 3-month follow-up until October 2018.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

Women aged from 18 to 40 years with PCOS and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) ≥2.14 were randomly assigned (n = 114 per group) to receive true acupuncture plus placebo (true acupuncture), metformin plus sham acupuncture (metformin, 0.5 g three times daily) or sham acupuncture plus placebo (sham acupuncture) for 4 months, with an additional 3-month follow-up. True or sham acupuncture was given three times per week, and 0.5 g metformin or placebo was given three times daily. The primary outcome was change in HOMA-IR from baseline to 4 months after baseline visit. Secondary outcomes included changes in the glucose AUC during an oral glucose tolerance test, BMI and side effects at 4 months after baseline visit.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

After 4 months of treatment, the changes of HOMA-IR were -0.5 (decreased 14.7%) in the true acupuncture group, -1.0 (decreased 25.0%) in the metformin group and -0.3 (decreased 8.6%) in the sham acupuncture group, when compared with baseline. True acupuncture is not as effective as metformin in improving HOMA-IR at 4 months after baseline visit (difference, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.1-1.1). No significant difference was found in change in HOMA-IR between true and sham acupuncture groups at 4 months after baseline visit (difference, -0.2; 95% CI, -0.7 to 0.3). During the 4 months of treatment, gastrointestinal side effects were more frequent in the metformin group, including diarrhea, nausea, loss of appetite, fatigue, vomiting and stomach discomfort (31.6%, 13.2%, 11.4%, 8.8%, 14.0% and 8.8%, respectively). Bruising was more common in the true acupuncture group (14.9%).

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

This study might have underestimated the sample size in the true acupuncture group with 4 months of treatment to enable detection of statistically significant changes in HOMA-IR with fixed acupuncture (i.e. a non-personalized protocol). Participants who withdrew because of pregnancy did not have further blood tests and this can introduce bias.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

True acupuncture did not improve insulin sensitivity as effectively as metformin in women with PCOS and IR, but it is better than metformin in improving glucose metabolism (which might reduce the risk of type 2 diabetes) and has less side effects. Metformin had a higher incidence of gastrointestinal adverse effects than acupuncture groups, and thus acupuncture might be a non-pharmacological treatment with low risk for women with PCOS. Further studies are needed to evaluate the effect of acupuncture combined with metformin on insulin sensitivity in these women.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

This work was supported by grants 2017A020213004 and 2014A020221060 from the Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province. The authors have no conflicts of interest.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Clinicaltrials.gov number: NCT02491333.

TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE

8 July 2015.

DATE OF FIRST PATIENT’S ENROLLMENT

11 November 2015.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. Institute of Integration of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Western Medicine, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. Institute of Integration of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Western Medicine, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. Institute of Integration of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Western Medicine, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.Department of Gynecology, Xuzhou Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China.Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dongguan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Dongguan, Guangdong, China.Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. Institute of Integration of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Western Medicine, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, Shenzhen, China.Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. Institute of Integration of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Western Medicine, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Language

eng

PubMed ID

34907435

Citation

Wen, Qidan, et al. "Effect of Acupuncture and Metformin On Insulin Sensitivity in Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome and Insulin Resistance: a Three-armed Randomized Controlled Trial." Human Reproduction (Oxford, England), vol. 37, no. 3, 2022, pp. 542-552.
Wen Q, Hu M, Lai M, et al. Effect of acupuncture and metformin on insulin sensitivity in women with polycystic ovary syndrome and insulin resistance: a three-armed randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2022;37(3):542-552.
Wen, Q., Hu, M., Lai, M., Li, J., Hu, Z., Quan, K., Liu, J., Liu, H., Meng, Y., Wang, S., Wen, X., Yu, C., Li, S., Huang, S., Zheng, Y., Lin, H., Liang, X., Lu, L., Mai, Z., ... Ma, H. (2022). Effect of acupuncture and metformin on insulin sensitivity in women with polycystic ovary syndrome and insulin resistance: a three-armed randomized controlled trial. Human Reproduction (Oxford, England), 37(3), 542-552. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deab272
Wen Q, et al. Effect of Acupuncture and Metformin On Insulin Sensitivity in Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome and Insulin Resistance: a Three-armed Randomized Controlled Trial. Hum Reprod. 2022 Mar 1;37(3):542-552. PubMed PMID: 34907435.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Effect of acupuncture and metformin on insulin sensitivity in women with polycystic ovary syndrome and insulin resistance: a three-armed randomized controlled trial. AU - Wen,Qidan, AU - Hu,Min, AU - Lai,Maohua, AU - Li,Juan, AU - Hu,Zhenxing, AU - Quan,Kewei, AU - Liu,Jia, AU - Liu,Hua, AU - Meng,Yanbing, AU - Wang,Suling, AU - Wen,Xiaohui, AU - Yu,Chuyi, AU - Li,Shuna, AU - Huang,Shiya, AU - Zheng,Yanhua, AU - Lin,Han, AU - Liang,Xingyan, AU - Lu,Lingjing, AU - Mai,Zhefen, AU - Zhang,Chunren, AU - Wu,Taixiang, AU - Ng,Ernest H Y, AU - Stener-Victorin,Elisabet, AU - Ma,Hongxia, PY - 2021/04/11/received PY - 2021/11/15/revised PY - 2021/12/16/pubmed PY - 2022/5/3/medline PY - 2021/12/15/entrez KW - acupuncture KW - glucose metabolism KW - homeostasis model assessment of insulin KW - insulin resistance KW - insulin sensitivity KW - metformin KW - polycystic ovary syndrome KW - sham acupuncture SP - 542 EP - 552 JF - Human reproduction (Oxford, England) JO - Hum Reprod VL - 37 IS - 3 N2 - STUDY QUESTION: Does acupuncture improve insulin sensitivity more effectively than metformin or sham acupuncture in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and insulin resistance (IR)? SUMMARY ANSWER: Among women with PCOS and IR, acupuncture was not more effective than metformin or sham acupuncture in improving insulin sensitivity. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Uncontrolled trials have shown that acupuncture improved insulin sensitivity with fewer side effects compared with metformin in women with PCOS and IR. However, data from randomized trials between acupuncture and metformin or sham acupuncture are lacking. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This was a three-armed randomized controlled trial enrolling a total of 342 women with PCOS and IR from three hospitals between November 2015 and February 2018, with a 3-month follow-up until October 2018. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Women aged from 18 to 40 years with PCOS and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) ≥2.14 were randomly assigned (n = 114 per group) to receive true acupuncture plus placebo (true acupuncture), metformin plus sham acupuncture (metformin, 0.5 g three times daily) or sham acupuncture plus placebo (sham acupuncture) for 4 months, with an additional 3-month follow-up. True or sham acupuncture was given three times per week, and 0.5 g metformin or placebo was given three times daily. The primary outcome was change in HOMA-IR from baseline to 4 months after baseline visit. Secondary outcomes included changes in the glucose AUC during an oral glucose tolerance test, BMI and side effects at 4 months after baseline visit. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: After 4 months of treatment, the changes of HOMA-IR were -0.5 (decreased 14.7%) in the true acupuncture group, -1.0 (decreased 25.0%) in the metformin group and -0.3 (decreased 8.6%) in the sham acupuncture group, when compared with baseline. True acupuncture is not as effective as metformin in improving HOMA-IR at 4 months after baseline visit (difference, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.1-1.1). No significant difference was found in change in HOMA-IR between true and sham acupuncture groups at 4 months after baseline visit (difference, -0.2; 95% CI, -0.7 to 0.3). During the 4 months of treatment, gastrointestinal side effects were more frequent in the metformin group, including diarrhea, nausea, loss of appetite, fatigue, vomiting and stomach discomfort (31.6%, 13.2%, 11.4%, 8.8%, 14.0% and 8.8%, respectively). Bruising was more common in the true acupuncture group (14.9%). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: This study might have underestimated the sample size in the true acupuncture group with 4 months of treatment to enable detection of statistically significant changes in HOMA-IR with fixed acupuncture (i.e. a non-personalized protocol). Participants who withdrew because of pregnancy did not have further blood tests and this can introduce bias. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: True acupuncture did not improve insulin sensitivity as effectively as metformin in women with PCOS and IR, but it is better than metformin in improving glucose metabolism (which might reduce the risk of type 2 diabetes) and has less side effects. Metformin had a higher incidence of gastrointestinal adverse effects than acupuncture groups, and thus acupuncture might be a non-pharmacological treatment with low risk for women with PCOS. Further studies are needed to evaluate the effect of acupuncture combined with metformin on insulin sensitivity in these women. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This work was supported by grants 2017A020213004 and 2014A020221060 from the Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province. The authors have no conflicts of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Clinicaltrials.gov number: NCT02491333. TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE: 8 July 2015. DATE OF FIRST PATIENT’S ENROLLMENT: 11 November 2015. SN - 1460-2350 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/34907435/Effect_of_acupuncture_and_metformin_on_insulin_sensitivity_in_women_with_polycystic_ovary_syndrome_and_insulin_resistance:_a_three_armed_randomized_controlled_trial_ DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -