Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Impact on grafted kidney function of rocuronium-sugammadex vs cisatracurium-neostigmine strategy for neuromuscular block management. An Italian single-center, 2014-2017 retrospective cohort case-control study.
Perioper Med (Lond). 2022 Jan 13; 11(1):3.PM

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The impact of sugammadex in patients with end-stage renal disease undergoing kidney transplantation is still far from being defined. The aim of the study is to compare sugammadex to neostigmine for reversal of rocuronium- and cisatracurium-induced neuromuscular block (NMB), respectively, in patients undergoing kidney transplantation.

METHODS

A single-center, 2014-2017 retrospective cohort case-control study was performed. A total of 350 patients undergoing kidney transplantation, equally divided between a sugammadex group (175 patients) and a neostigmine group (175 patients), were considered. Postoperative kidney function, evaluated by monitoring of serum creatinine and urea and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), was the endpoint. Other endpoints were anesthetic and surgical times, post-anesthesia care unit length of stay, postoperative intensive care unit admission, and recurrent NMB or complications.

RESULTS

No significant differences in patient or, with the exception of drugs involved in NMB management, anesthetic, and surgical characteristics, were observed between the two groups. Serum creatinine (median [interquartile range]: 596.0 [478.0-749.0] vs 639.0 [527.7-870.0] μmol/L, p = 0.0128) and serum urea (14.9 [10.8-21.6] vs 17.1 [13.1-22.0] mmol/L, p = 0.0486) were lower, while eGFR (8.0 [6.0-11.0] vs 8.0 [6.0-10.0], p = 0.0473) was higher in the sugammadex group than in the neostigmine group after surgery. The sugammadex group showed significantly lower incidence of postoperative severe hypoxemia (0.6% vs 6.3%, p = 0.006), shorter PACU stay (70 [60-90] min vs 90 [60-105] min, p < 0.001), and reduced ICU admissions (0.6% vs 8.0%, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to cisatracurium-neostigmine, the rocuronium-sugammadex strategy for reversal of NMB showed a better recovery profile in patients undergoing kidney transplantation.

Links

PMC Free PDF

Authors+Show Affiliations

Carron M
Department of Medicine, DIMED, Section of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Padova, Via V. Gallucci, 13, 35121, Padova, Italy. michele.carron@unipd.it.
Andreatta G
Department of Medicine, DIMED, Section of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Padova, Via V. Gallucci, 13, 35121, Padova, Italy.
Pesenti E
Department of Medicine, DIMED, Section of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Padova, Via V. Gallucci, 13, 35121, Padova, Italy.
De Cassai A
Institute of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Azienda Ospedale Università Padova, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padova, Italy.
Feltracco P
Department of Medicine, DIMED, Section of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Padova, Via V. Gallucci, 13, 35121, Padova, Italy.
Linassi F
Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Ca' Foncello Treviso Regional Hospital, Piazzale Ospedale 1, 31100, Treviso, Italy.
Sergi M
Institute of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Azienda Ospedale Università Padova, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padova, Italy.
Di Bella C
Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation Unit, University of Padova, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padova, Italy.
Di Bello M
Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation Unit, University of Padova, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padova, Italy.
Neri F
Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation Unit, University of Padova, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padova, Italy.
Silvestre C
Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation Unit, Azienda Ospedale Università Padova, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padova, Italy.
Furian L
Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation Unit, University of Padova, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padova, Italy.
Navalesi P
Department of Medicine, DIMED, Section of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Padova, Via V. Gallucci, 13, 35121, Padova, Italy.

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

35022076

Citation

Carron, M, et al. "Impact On Grafted Kidney Function of Rocuronium-sugammadex Vs Cisatracurium-neostigmine Strategy for Neuromuscular Block Management. an Italian Single-center, 2014-2017 Retrospective Cohort Case-control Study." Perioperative Medicine (London, England), vol. 11, no. 1, 2022, p. 3.
Carron M, Andreatta G, Pesenti E, et al. Impact on grafted kidney function of rocuronium-sugammadex vs cisatracurium-neostigmine strategy for neuromuscular block management. An Italian single-center, 2014-2017 retrospective cohort case-control study. Perioper Med (Lond). 2022;11(1):3.
Carron, M., Andreatta, G., Pesenti, E., De Cassai, A., Feltracco, P., Linassi, F., Sergi, M., Di Bella, C., Di Bello, M., Neri, F., Silvestre, C., Furian, L., & Navalesi, P. (2022). Impact on grafted kidney function of rocuronium-sugammadex vs cisatracurium-neostigmine strategy for neuromuscular block management. An Italian single-center, 2014-2017 retrospective cohort case-control study. Perioperative Medicine (London, England), 11(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13741-021-00231-2
Carron M, et al. Impact On Grafted Kidney Function of Rocuronium-sugammadex Vs Cisatracurium-neostigmine Strategy for Neuromuscular Block Management. an Italian Single-center, 2014-2017 Retrospective Cohort Case-control Study. Perioper Med (Lond). 2022 Jan 13;11(1):3. PubMed PMID: 35022076.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Impact on grafted kidney function of rocuronium-sugammadex vs cisatracurium-neostigmine strategy for neuromuscular block management. An Italian single-center, 2014-2017 retrospective cohort case-control study. AU - Carron,M, AU - Andreatta,G, AU - Pesenti,E, AU - De Cassai,A, AU - Feltracco,P, AU - Linassi,F, AU - Sergi,M, AU - Di Bella,C, AU - Di Bello,M, AU - Neri,F, AU - Silvestre,C, AU - Furian,L, AU - Navalesi,P, Y1 - 2022/01/13/ PY - 2021/02/22/received PY - 2021/11/18/accepted PY - 2022/1/13/entrez PY - 2022/1/14/pubmed PY - 2022/1/14/medline KW - Anesthesia KW - Cisatracurium KW - End-stage renal disease KW - Kidney transplantation KW - Neostigmine KW - Neuromuscular block KW - Rocuronium KW - Sugammadex SP - 3 EP - 3 JF - Perioperative medicine (London, England) JO - Perioper Med (Lond) VL - 11 IS - 1 N2 - BACKGROUND: The impact of sugammadex in patients with end-stage renal disease undergoing kidney transplantation is still far from being defined. The aim of the study is to compare sugammadex to neostigmine for reversal of rocuronium- and cisatracurium-induced neuromuscular block (NMB), respectively, in patients undergoing kidney transplantation. METHODS: A single-center, 2014-2017 retrospective cohort case-control study was performed. A total of 350 patients undergoing kidney transplantation, equally divided between a sugammadex group (175 patients) and a neostigmine group (175 patients), were considered. Postoperative kidney function, evaluated by monitoring of serum creatinine and urea and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), was the endpoint. Other endpoints were anesthetic and surgical times, post-anesthesia care unit length of stay, postoperative intensive care unit admission, and recurrent NMB or complications. RESULTS: No significant differences in patient or, with the exception of drugs involved in NMB management, anesthetic, and surgical characteristics, were observed between the two groups. Serum creatinine (median [interquartile range]: 596.0 [478.0-749.0] vs 639.0 [527.7-870.0] μmol/L, p = 0.0128) and serum urea (14.9 [10.8-21.6] vs 17.1 [13.1-22.0] mmol/L, p = 0.0486) were lower, while eGFR (8.0 [6.0-11.0] vs 8.0 [6.0-10.0], p = 0.0473) was higher in the sugammadex group than in the neostigmine group after surgery. The sugammadex group showed significantly lower incidence of postoperative severe hypoxemia (0.6% vs 6.3%, p = 0.006), shorter PACU stay (70 [60-90] min vs 90 [60-105] min, p < 0.001), and reduced ICU admissions (0.6% vs 8.0%, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to cisatracurium-neostigmine, the rocuronium-sugammadex strategy for reversal of NMB showed a better recovery profile in patients undergoing kidney transplantation. SN - 2047-0525 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/35022076/Impact_on_grafted_kidney_function_of_rocuronium_sugammadex_vs_cisatracurium_neostigmine_strategy_for_neuromuscular_block_management__An_Italian_single_center_2014_2017_retrospective_cohort_case_control_study_ DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -