Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Dopamine Receptor Partial Agonists: Do They Differ in Their Clinical Efficacy?
Front Psychiatry. 2021; 12:781946.FP

Abstract

Dopamine receptor partial agonists (DRPAs; aripiprazole, brexpiprazole, and cariprazine) constitute a novel class of antipsychotics. Although they share a similar mechanism of action, DRPAs differ in their pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, drug interactions, or safety and tolerability. The antipsychotic efficacy of all three drugs was established in several placebo-controlled randomized trials (RCTs) in schizophrenia, both acute phase and relapse prevention. In addition, each of the DRPA agents has been tested in other psychiatric disorders, including bipolar disorder or major depression. However, a few studies have examined their comparative clinical efficacy. There are no head-to-head comparisons between aripiprazole, brexpiprazole, or cariprazine. In two acute schizophrenia RCTs of cariprazine and brexpiprazole, aripiprazole was used as an indirect comparator to control for study sensitivity. To assess potential differences in the efficacy of DRPAs, we reviewed data from controlled trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses. Our results showed that the acute antipsychotic effects of DRPAs, as measured by the number needed to treat, are comparable. The three agents were superior to placebo in acute treatment, and cariprazine was found to be effective in the reduction of primary negative symptoms of schizophrenia. In the therapy of bipolar disorder, aripiprazole and cariprazine showed antimanic efficacy, cariprazine was also effective in the management of bipolar depression, and aripiprazole was effective for relapse prevention. The addon administration of aripiprazole or brexpiprazole reduced symptoms of major depression. Aripiprazole can control acute agitation associated with psychosis or bipolar disorder; brexpiprazole showed the potential to manage agitation in dementia patients. Aripiprazole has also established evidence of efficacy in children and adolescents and other conditions: OCD, tic disorders, and autism spectrum disorder. Our review of published data suggests that in terms of clinical efficacy, DRPAs are a heterogeneous group, with each drug possessing its own therapeutic benefits.

Authors+Show Affiliations

National Institute of Mental Health, Klecany, Czechia. Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czechia.Psychiatric Clinic of the University Hospital Hradec Kràlové, Charles University, Hradec Kràlové, Czechia.National Institute of Mental Health, Klecany, Czechia. Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czechia.

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article
Review

Language

eng

PubMed ID

35145438

Citation

Mohr, Pavel, et al. "Dopamine Receptor Partial Agonists: Do They Differ in Their Clinical Efficacy?" Frontiers in Psychiatry, vol. 12, 2021, p. 781946.
Mohr P, Masopust J, Kopeček M. Dopamine Receptor Partial Agonists: Do They Differ in Their Clinical Efficacy? Front Psychiatry. 2021;12:781946.
Mohr, P., Masopust, J., & Kopeček, M. (2021). Dopamine Receptor Partial Agonists: Do They Differ in Their Clinical Efficacy? Frontiers in Psychiatry, 12, 781946. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.781946
Mohr P, Masopust J, Kopeček M. Dopamine Receptor Partial Agonists: Do They Differ in Their Clinical Efficacy. Front Psychiatry. 2021;12:781946. PubMed PMID: 35145438.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Dopamine Receptor Partial Agonists: Do They Differ in Their Clinical Efficacy? AU - Mohr,Pavel, AU - Masopust,Jirí, AU - Kopeček,Miloslav, Y1 - 2022/01/25/ PY - 2021/09/23/received PY - 2021/12/09/accepted PY - 2022/2/11/entrez PY - 2022/2/12/pubmed PY - 2022/2/12/medline KW - antipsychotics KW - aripiprazole KW - brexpiprazole KW - cariprazine KW - clinical efficacy KW - dopamine partial agonists SP - 781946 EP - 781946 JF - Frontiers in psychiatry JO - Front Psychiatry VL - 12 N2 - Dopamine receptor partial agonists (DRPAs; aripiprazole, brexpiprazole, and cariprazine) constitute a novel class of antipsychotics. Although they share a similar mechanism of action, DRPAs differ in their pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, drug interactions, or safety and tolerability. The antipsychotic efficacy of all three drugs was established in several placebo-controlled randomized trials (RCTs) in schizophrenia, both acute phase and relapse prevention. In addition, each of the DRPA agents has been tested in other psychiatric disorders, including bipolar disorder or major depression. However, a few studies have examined their comparative clinical efficacy. There are no head-to-head comparisons between aripiprazole, brexpiprazole, or cariprazine. In two acute schizophrenia RCTs of cariprazine and brexpiprazole, aripiprazole was used as an indirect comparator to control for study sensitivity. To assess potential differences in the efficacy of DRPAs, we reviewed data from controlled trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses. Our results showed that the acute antipsychotic effects of DRPAs, as measured by the number needed to treat, are comparable. The three agents were superior to placebo in acute treatment, and cariprazine was found to be effective in the reduction of primary negative symptoms of schizophrenia. In the therapy of bipolar disorder, aripiprazole and cariprazine showed antimanic efficacy, cariprazine was also effective in the management of bipolar depression, and aripiprazole was effective for relapse prevention. The addon administration of aripiprazole or brexpiprazole reduced symptoms of major depression. Aripiprazole can control acute agitation associated with psychosis or bipolar disorder; brexpiprazole showed the potential to manage agitation in dementia patients. Aripiprazole has also established evidence of efficacy in children and adolescents and other conditions: OCD, tic disorders, and autism spectrum disorder. Our review of published data suggests that in terms of clinical efficacy, DRPAs are a heterogeneous group, with each drug possessing its own therapeutic benefits. SN - 1664-0640 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/35145438/Dopamine_Receptor_Partial_Agonists:_Do_They_Differ_in_Their_Clinical_Efficacy DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -
Try the Free App:
Prime PubMed app for iOS iPhone iPad
Prime PubMed app for Android
Prime PubMed is provided
free to individuals by:
Unbound Medicine.