Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Sustained Impact of the Philadelphia Beverage Tax on Beverage Prices and Sales Over 2 Years.
Am J Prev Med. 2022 06; 62(6):921-929.AJ

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

It is unclear whether changes in beverage price and sales after beverage tax implementation can be sustained long term. This study aims to quantify the changes in beverage prices and sales in large retailers 2 years after the implementation of the 1.5 cents per ounce Philadelphia beverage tax.

METHODS

Data on price and volume sales of beverages and potential food substitutes were collected from 109 supermarkets, 45 mass merchandizers, and 350 pharmacies in Philadelphia, Baltimore (control), and Pennsylvania ZIP codes bordering Philadelphia (to investigate potential cross-border shopping for tax avoidance). Difference-in-differences analyses compared beverage prices and volume sales in the year before tax implementation (2016) to 2 years after (2018). Data were analyzed in 2020-2021.

RESULTS

Difference-in-differences analyses found that after tax implementation, taxed beverage prices in Philadelphia increased by 1.02 cents per ounce (95% CI=0.94, 1.11; 68% pass through), and taxed beverage volume sales in stores decreased by 50% (95% CI=36%, 61%). After accounting for cross-border shopping, taxed beverage volume sales decreased in Philadelphia by 35% in 2018. Volume sales of nontaxed beverages did not change after tax implementation (difference-in-differences=4%, 95% CI= -3%, 12%). Volume sales of nontaxed beverage concentrates increased on average by 34% (95% CI=19%, 51%), but there was no evidence of substitution to high-calorie foods.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a large reduction in taxed beverage volume sales 2 years after Philadelphia tax implementation, even after accounting for cross-border shopping. Increases in nontaxed beverage concentrate sales likely partially offset this decline, but there was no evidence of post-tax food substitution.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Division of Chronic Disease Research Across the Lifecourse, Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, Massachusetts. Electronic address: jsp778@mail.harvard.edu.Department of Medical Ethics & Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.Department of Medical Ethics & Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology & Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology & Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.Division of Chronic Disease & Injury Prevention, Philadelphia Department of Public Health, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.Department of Medical Ethics & Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

Language

eng

PubMed ID

35221175

Citation

Petimar, Joshua, et al. "Sustained Impact of the Philadelphia Beverage Tax On Beverage Prices and Sales Over 2 Years." American Journal of Preventive Medicine, vol. 62, no. 6, 2022, pp. 921-929.
Petimar J, Gibson LA, Yan J, et al. Sustained Impact of the Philadelphia Beverage Tax on Beverage Prices and Sales Over 2 Years. Am J Prev Med. 2022;62(6):921-929.
Petimar, J., Gibson, L. A., Yan, J., Bleich, S. N., Mitra, N., Trego, M. L., Lawman, H. G., & Roberto, C. A. (2022). Sustained Impact of the Philadelphia Beverage Tax on Beverage Prices and Sales Over 2 Years. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 62(6), 921-929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2021.12.012
Petimar J, et al. Sustained Impact of the Philadelphia Beverage Tax On Beverage Prices and Sales Over 2 Years. Am J Prev Med. 2022;62(6):921-929. PubMed PMID: 35221175.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Sustained Impact of the Philadelphia Beverage Tax on Beverage Prices and Sales Over 2 Years. AU - Petimar,Joshua, AU - Gibson,Laura A, AU - Yan,Jiali, AU - Bleich,Sara N, AU - Mitra,Nandita, AU - Trego,Marsha L, AU - Lawman,Hannah G, AU - Roberto,Christina A, Y1 - 2022/02/25/ PY - 2021/08/30/received PY - 2021/12/02/revised PY - 2021/12/03/accepted PY - 2022/3/1/pubmed PY - 2022/5/25/medline PY - 2022/2/28/entrez SP - 921 EP - 929 JF - American journal of preventive medicine JO - Am J Prev Med VL - 62 IS - 6 N2 - INTRODUCTION: It is unclear whether changes in beverage price and sales after beverage tax implementation can be sustained long term. This study aims to quantify the changes in beverage prices and sales in large retailers 2 years after the implementation of the 1.5 cents per ounce Philadelphia beverage tax. METHODS: Data on price and volume sales of beverages and potential food substitutes were collected from 109 supermarkets, 45 mass merchandizers, and 350 pharmacies in Philadelphia, Baltimore (control), and Pennsylvania ZIP codes bordering Philadelphia (to investigate potential cross-border shopping for tax avoidance). Difference-in-differences analyses compared beverage prices and volume sales in the year before tax implementation (2016) to 2 years after (2018). Data were analyzed in 2020-2021. RESULTS: Difference-in-differences analyses found that after tax implementation, taxed beverage prices in Philadelphia increased by 1.02 cents per ounce (95% CI=0.94, 1.11; 68% pass through), and taxed beverage volume sales in stores decreased by 50% (95% CI=36%, 61%). After accounting for cross-border shopping, taxed beverage volume sales decreased in Philadelphia by 35% in 2018. Volume sales of nontaxed beverages did not change after tax implementation (difference-in-differences=4%, 95% CI= -3%, 12%). Volume sales of nontaxed beverage concentrates increased on average by 34% (95% CI=19%, 51%), but there was no evidence of substitution to high-calorie foods. CONCLUSIONS: There was a large reduction in taxed beverage volume sales 2 years after Philadelphia tax implementation, even after accounting for cross-border shopping. Increases in nontaxed beverage concentrate sales likely partially offset this decline, but there was no evidence of post-tax food substitution. SN - 1873-2607 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/35221175/Sustained_Impact_of_the_Philadelphia_Beverage_Tax_on_Beverage_Prices_and_Sales_Over_2_Years_ DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -