Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Diagnosis of fetal growth restriction in a cohort of small-for-gestational-age neonates at term: neonatal and maternal outcomes.
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2022 09; 4(5):100672.AJ

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Small-for-gestational-age neonates (birthweight of <10th percentile for gestational age) are significantly more likely to have multiple adverse outcomes than appropriate-for-gestational-age neonates (birthweight of 10th-90th percentile). Most small-for-gestational-age neonates are undetected during pregnancy (ie, not diagnosed as fetal growth restriction), but the sequela of being undetected remains uncertain.

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective of this study was to compare the composite neonatal adverse outcomes among singleton pregnancies that were at least 37 weeks and delivered small-for-gestational-age neonates, which were diagnosed as either fetal growth restriction during pregnancy (detected small for gestational age) or not (undetected small for gestational age).

STUDY DESIGN

This was a secondary analysis of a retrospective cohort, the Consortium for Safe Labor. Singleton births at 37.0 to 41.6 weeks of gestation without congenital anomalies born small for gestational age were included in the analysis. The primary outcome was the rate of composite neonatal adverse outcome, defined as any of the following: Apgar score of <5 at 5 minutes, cardiopulmonary resuscitation at birth, respiratory distress syndrome, continuous positive airway pressure, mechanical ventilation, neonatal seizures, hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy or diagnosis of asphyxia, intraventricular hemorrhage, necrotizing enterocolitis, neonatal sepsis, or fetal or neonatal death. The secondary outcome was the rate of composite maternal adverse outcome, which included any of the following: postpartum hemorrhage, peripartum infection, thromboembolism, hysterectomy, uterine rupture, eclampsia, intensive care unit admission, or maternal death. Small for gestational age with a prenatal diagnosis of fetal growth restriction (detected small for gestational age) was compared with small for gestational age without a prenatal diagnosis of fetal growth restriction (undetected small for gestational age). Multivariate logistic regression models were used to compare groups. A P value of <.05 was considered statistically significant. Gestational age-specific risks of composite neonatal adverse outcome and perinatal death were computed for each week of gestation among ongoing pregnancies.

RESULTS

Of the 228,438 deliveries in the Consortium for Safe Labor, 18,607 (8.1%) met the inclusion criteria. Among these deliveries, 17,689 (95.0%) were undetected small for gestational age, and 918 (5.0%) were detected small for gestational age. The overall rate of composite neonatal adverse outcome was 3.0%. Moreover, the rate of composite neonatal adverse outcome was similar between undetected small for gestational age and detected small for gestational age (3.0% vs 3.9%, respectively; adjusted odds ratio, 1.33; 95% confidence interval, 0.88-2.00). Some components of the composite-respiratory distress syndrome, mechanical ventilation, and necrotizing enterocolitis-were significantly higher among undetected small for gestational age than among detected small for gestational age. The overall rate of composite maternal adverse outcome was 6.2%. The rate of composite maternal adverse outcome between undetected small for gestational age and detected small for gestational age (6.2% vs 5.1%, respectively; adjusted odds ratio, 0.84; 95% confidence interval, 0.60-1.18) was similar. In gestational age-specific comparisons of composite neonatal adverse outcome, no difference was found between the undetected small-for-gestational-age group and the detected small-for-gestational-age group except for in pregnancies >41 weeks. In pregnancies at 41.0 to 41.6 weeks, the rate of composite neonatal adverse outcome was significantly greater in detected small for gestational age than in undetected small for gestational age (10.0% vs 2.5%, respectively; P=.035).

CONCLUSION

Antenatal detection of small for gestational age was not associated with improved composite neonatal adverse outcomes, although some components of morbidity improved with detection. Maternal outcomes did not differ between detected small for gestational age and undetected small for gestational age.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX. Electronic address: beth.l.pineles@uth.tmc.edu.Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX.Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX.

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Intramural

Language

eng

PubMed ID

35667554

Citation

Pineles, Beth L., et al. "Diagnosis of Fetal Growth Restriction in a Cohort of Small-for-gestational-age Neonates at Term: Neonatal and Maternal Outcomes." American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM, vol. 4, no. 5, 2022, p. 100672.
Pineles BL, Mendez-Figueroa H, Chauhan SP. Diagnosis of fetal growth restriction in a cohort of small-for-gestational-age neonates at term: neonatal and maternal outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2022;4(5):100672.
Pineles, B. L., Mendez-Figueroa, H., & Chauhan, S. P. (2022). Diagnosis of fetal growth restriction in a cohort of small-for-gestational-age neonates at term: neonatal and maternal outcomes. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM, 4(5), 100672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajogmf.2022.100672
Pineles BL, Mendez-Figueroa H, Chauhan SP. Diagnosis of Fetal Growth Restriction in a Cohort of Small-for-gestational-age Neonates at Term: Neonatal and Maternal Outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2022;4(5):100672. PubMed PMID: 35667554.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Diagnosis of fetal growth restriction in a cohort of small-for-gestational-age neonates at term: neonatal and maternal outcomes. AU - Pineles,Beth L, AU - Mendez-Figueroa,Hector, AU - Chauhan,Suneet P, Y1 - 2022/06/03/ PY - 2021/09/17/received PY - 2022/05/20/revised PY - 2022/05/30/accepted PY - 2022/6/7/pubmed PY - 2022/9/9/medline PY - 2022/6/6/entrez KW - fetal growth restriction KW - intrauterine growth restriction KW - pregnancy KW - small for gestational age SP - 100672 EP - 100672 JF - American journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM JO - Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM VL - 4 IS - 5 N2 - BACKGROUND: Small-for-gestational-age neonates (birthweight of <10th percentile for gestational age) are significantly more likely to have multiple adverse outcomes than appropriate-for-gestational-age neonates (birthweight of 10th-90th percentile). Most small-for-gestational-age neonates are undetected during pregnancy (ie, not diagnosed as fetal growth restriction), but the sequela of being undetected remains uncertain. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study was to compare the composite neonatal adverse outcomes among singleton pregnancies that were at least 37 weeks and delivered small-for-gestational-age neonates, which were diagnosed as either fetal growth restriction during pregnancy (detected small for gestational age) or not (undetected small for gestational age). STUDY DESIGN: This was a secondary analysis of a retrospective cohort, the Consortium for Safe Labor. Singleton births at 37.0 to 41.6 weeks of gestation without congenital anomalies born small for gestational age were included in the analysis. The primary outcome was the rate of composite neonatal adverse outcome, defined as any of the following: Apgar score of <5 at 5 minutes, cardiopulmonary resuscitation at birth, respiratory distress syndrome, continuous positive airway pressure, mechanical ventilation, neonatal seizures, hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy or diagnosis of asphyxia, intraventricular hemorrhage, necrotizing enterocolitis, neonatal sepsis, or fetal or neonatal death. The secondary outcome was the rate of composite maternal adverse outcome, which included any of the following: postpartum hemorrhage, peripartum infection, thromboembolism, hysterectomy, uterine rupture, eclampsia, intensive care unit admission, or maternal death. Small for gestational age with a prenatal diagnosis of fetal growth restriction (detected small for gestational age) was compared with small for gestational age without a prenatal diagnosis of fetal growth restriction (undetected small for gestational age). Multivariate logistic regression models were used to compare groups. A P value of <.05 was considered statistically significant. Gestational age-specific risks of composite neonatal adverse outcome and perinatal death were computed for each week of gestation among ongoing pregnancies. RESULTS: Of the 228,438 deliveries in the Consortium for Safe Labor, 18,607 (8.1%) met the inclusion criteria. Among these deliveries, 17,689 (95.0%) were undetected small for gestational age, and 918 (5.0%) were detected small for gestational age. The overall rate of composite neonatal adverse outcome was 3.0%. Moreover, the rate of composite neonatal adverse outcome was similar between undetected small for gestational age and detected small for gestational age (3.0% vs 3.9%, respectively; adjusted odds ratio, 1.33; 95% confidence interval, 0.88-2.00). Some components of the composite-respiratory distress syndrome, mechanical ventilation, and necrotizing enterocolitis-were significantly higher among undetected small for gestational age than among detected small for gestational age. The overall rate of composite maternal adverse outcome was 6.2%. The rate of composite maternal adverse outcome between undetected small for gestational age and detected small for gestational age (6.2% vs 5.1%, respectively; adjusted odds ratio, 0.84; 95% confidence interval, 0.60-1.18) was similar. In gestational age-specific comparisons of composite neonatal adverse outcome, no difference was found between the undetected small-for-gestational-age group and the detected small-for-gestational-age group except for in pregnancies >41 weeks. In pregnancies at 41.0 to 41.6 weeks, the rate of composite neonatal adverse outcome was significantly greater in detected small for gestational age than in undetected small for gestational age (10.0% vs 2.5%, respectively; P=.035). CONCLUSION: Antenatal detection of small for gestational age was not associated with improved composite neonatal adverse outcomes, although some components of morbidity improved with detection. Maternal outcomes did not differ between detected small for gestational age and undetected small for gestational age. SN - 2589-9333 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/35667554/Diagnosis_of_fetal_growth_restriction_in_a_cohort_of_small_for_gestational_age_neonates_at_term:_neonatal_and_maternal_outcomes_ DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -