Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

CAD/CAM versus 3D-printing/pressed lithium disilicate monolithic crowns: Adaptation and fatigue behavior.
J Dent. 2022 08; 123:104181.JD

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

this study aimed to evaluate the adaptation and fatigue behavior of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic (LD) monolithic crowns produced by press (combined with 3D-printing) and CAD/CAM milling (control) techniques.

METHODS

thirty abutment preparations with a chamfer finish line were produced with a dentin analogue material and scanned with extraoral scanner. Captured images were processed using CAD software to design a premolar. Blocks of LD were milled using CAD/CAM system. For the press technique, crowns were first 3D-printed using a polymeric material and the heat-pressing protocol was performed. Crowns were adhesively cemented to the abutments and scanned using micro-CT. Files were processed and cross-sectional images were analysed in five measuring points: marginal, axial angle, axial, occlusal angle and occlusal. Fatigue test was performed in a MTS universal testing machine (2 Hz, 37°C distilled water) using an anatomic composite piston, following the step-stress method. Failures were detected with an acoustic system and confirmed by transillumination. A cumulative damage-Weibull distribution (95% CI) was used to analyze the fatigue data. Gap thickness data were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and Student-Newman-Keuls tests (α=0.05).

RESULTS

CAD/CAM milling resulted in larger gap thickness in the occlusal area and smaller gap thickness in the axial angle and axial area than press (p<0.05). The probability of failure was similar for crowns produced with CAD/CAM milling and press. The most frequent failure mode was radial crack.

CONCLUSIONS

LD crowns produced using the combination of 3D-printing/press technique showed similar fatigue behavior than CAD/CAM milled control group, and resulted in smaller gap thickness at the occlusal region.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

A more controlled process can be achieved by replacing conventional restoration waxing with 3D printing, which in combination with the press technique produces lithium disilicate glass-ceramic monolithic crowns with good adaptation and high fatigue survival.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Graduate Program in Dentistry, University of Passo Fundo, BR 285, Km 171, Passo Fundo, São José, RS 99052-900, Brazil. Electronic address: cdrodrigoottoni@gmail.com.Department of Biomedical Materials Science, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, USA.Department of Biomedical Materials Science, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, USA.Graduate Program in Dentistry, University of Passo Fundo, BR 285, Km 171, Passo Fundo, São José, RS 99052-900, Brazil.

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Language

eng

PubMed ID

35679990

Citation

Ottoni, Rodrigo, et al. "CAD/CAM Versus 3D-printing/pressed Lithium Disilicate Monolithic Crowns: Adaptation and Fatigue Behavior." Journal of Dentistry, vol. 123, 2022, p. 104181.
Ottoni R, Marocho SMS, Griggs JA, et al. CAD/CAM versus 3D-printing/pressed lithium disilicate monolithic crowns: Adaptation and fatigue behavior. J Dent. 2022;123:104181.
Ottoni, R., Marocho, S. M. S., Griggs, J. A., & Borba, M. (2022). CAD/CAM versus 3D-printing/pressed lithium disilicate monolithic crowns: Adaptation and fatigue behavior. Journal of Dentistry, 123, 104181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104181
Ottoni R, et al. CAD/CAM Versus 3D-printing/pressed Lithium Disilicate Monolithic Crowns: Adaptation and Fatigue Behavior. J Dent. 2022;123:104181. PubMed PMID: 35679990.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - CAD/CAM versus 3D-printing/pressed lithium disilicate monolithic crowns: Adaptation and fatigue behavior. AU - Ottoni,Rodrigo, AU - Marocho,Susana M Salazar, AU - Griggs,Jason A, AU - Borba,Márcia, Y1 - 2022/06/07/ PY - 2021/11/15/received PY - 2022/05/13/revised PY - 2022/06/06/accepted PY - 2022/6/10/pubmed PY - 2022/7/20/medline PY - 2022/6/9/entrez KW - 3D printing KW - CAD/CAM KW - Ceramics KW - Dental prosthesis KW - Resin cement SP - 104181 EP - 104181 JF - Journal of dentistry JO - J Dent VL - 123 N2 - OBJECTIVES: this study aimed to evaluate the adaptation and fatigue behavior of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic (LD) monolithic crowns produced by press (combined with 3D-printing) and CAD/CAM milling (control) techniques. METHODS: thirty abutment preparations with a chamfer finish line were produced with a dentin analogue material and scanned with extraoral scanner. Captured images were processed using CAD software to design a premolar. Blocks of LD were milled using CAD/CAM system. For the press technique, crowns were first 3D-printed using a polymeric material and the heat-pressing protocol was performed. Crowns were adhesively cemented to the abutments and scanned using micro-CT. Files were processed and cross-sectional images were analysed in five measuring points: marginal, axial angle, axial, occlusal angle and occlusal. Fatigue test was performed in a MTS universal testing machine (2 Hz, 37°C distilled water) using an anatomic composite piston, following the step-stress method. Failures were detected with an acoustic system and confirmed by transillumination. A cumulative damage-Weibull distribution (95% CI) was used to analyze the fatigue data. Gap thickness data were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and Student-Newman-Keuls tests (α=0.05). RESULTS: CAD/CAM milling resulted in larger gap thickness in the occlusal area and smaller gap thickness in the axial angle and axial area than press (p<0.05). The probability of failure was similar for crowns produced with CAD/CAM milling and press. The most frequent failure mode was radial crack. CONCLUSIONS: LD crowns produced using the combination of 3D-printing/press technique showed similar fatigue behavior than CAD/CAM milled control group, and resulted in smaller gap thickness at the occlusal region. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: A more controlled process can be achieved by replacing conventional restoration waxing with 3D printing, which in combination with the press technique produces lithium disilicate glass-ceramic monolithic crowns with good adaptation and high fatigue survival. SN - 1879-176X UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/35679990/CAD/CAM_versus_3D_printing/pressed_lithium_disilicate_monolithic_crowns:_Adaptation_and_fatigue_behavior_ DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -