Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Photodynamic versus white-light-guided resection of first-diagnosis non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: PHOTO RCT.
Health Technol Assess. 2022 Oct; 26(40):1-144.HT

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Around 7500 people are diagnosed with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer in the UK annually. Recurrence following transurethral resection of bladder tumour is common, and the intensive monitoring schedule required after initial treatment has associated costs for patients and the NHS. In photodynamic diagnosis, before transurethral resection of bladder tumour, a photosensitiser that is preferentially absorbed by tumour cells is instilled intravesically. Transurethral resection of bladder tumour is then conducted under blue light, causing the photosensitiser to fluoresce. Photodynamic diagnosis-guided transurethral resection of bladder tumour offers better diagnostic accuracy than standard white-light-guided transurethral resection of bladder tumour, potentially reducing the chance of subsequent recurrence.

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to assess the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of photodynamic diagnosis-guided transurethral resection of bladder tumour.

DESIGN

This was a multicentre, pragmatic, open-label, parallel-group, non-masked, superiority randomised controlled trial. Allocation was by remote web-based service, using a 1 : 1 ratio and a minimisation algorithm balanced by centre and sex.

SETTING

The setting was 22 NHS hospitals.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients aged ≥ 16 years with a suspected first diagnosis of high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer, no contraindications to photodynamic diagnosis and written informed consent were eligible.

INTERVENTIONS

Photodynamic diagnosis-guided transurethral resection of bladder tumour and standard white-light cystoscopy transurethral resection of bladder tumour.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary clinical outcome measure was the time to recurrence from the date of randomisation to the date of pathologically proven first recurrence (or intercurrent bladder cancer death). The primary health economic outcome was the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year gained at 3 years.

RESULTS

We enrolled 538 participants from 22 UK hospitals between 11 November 2014 and 6 February 2018. Of these, 269 were allocated to photodynamic diagnosis and 269 were allocated to white light. A total of 112 participants were excluded from the analysis because of ineligibility (n = 5), lack of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer diagnosis following transurethral resection of bladder tumour (n = 89) or early cystectomy (n = 18). In total, 209 photodynamic diagnosis and 217 white-light participants were included in the clinical end-point analysis population. All randomised participants were included in the cost-effectiveness analysis. Over a median follow-up period of 21 months for the photodynamic diagnosis group and 22 months for the white-light group, there were 86 recurrences (3-year recurrence-free survival rate 57.8%, 95% confidence interval 50.7% to 64.2%) in the photodynamic diagnosis group and 84 recurrences (3-year recurrence-free survival rate 61.6%, 95% confidence interval 54.7% to 67.8%) in the white-light group (hazard ratio 0.94, 95% confidence interval 0.69 to 1.28; p = 0.70). Adverse event frequency was low and similar in both groups [12 (5.7%) in the photodynamic diagnosis group vs. 12 (5.5%) in the white-light group]. At 3 years, the total cost was £12,881 for photodynamic diagnosis-guided transurethral resection of bladder tumour and £12,005 for white light. There was no evidence of differences in the use of health services or total cost at 3 years. At 3 years, the quality-adjusted life-years gain was 2.094 in the photodynamic diagnosis transurethral resection of bladder tumour group and 2.087 in the white light group. The probability that photodynamic diagnosis-guided transurethral resection of bladder tumour was cost-effective was never > 30% over the range of society's cost-effectiveness thresholds.

LIMITATIONS

Fewer patients than anticipated were correctly diagnosed with intermediate- to high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer before transurethral resection of bladder tumour and the ratio of intermediate- to high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer was higher than expected, reducing the number of observed recurrences and the statistical power.

CONCLUSIONS

Photodynamic diagnosis-guided transurethral resection of bladder tumour did not reduce recurrences, nor was it likely to be cost-effective compared with white light at 3 years. Photodynamic diagnosis-guided transurethral resection of bladder tumour is not supported in the management of primary intermediate- to high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

FUTURE WORK

Further work should include the modelling of appropriate surveillance schedules and exploring predictive and prognostic biomarkers.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This trial is registered as ISRCTN84013636.

FUNDING

This project was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research ( NIHR ) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 26, No. 40. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Northern Institute for Cancer Research, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.Centre for Healthcare Randomised Trials (CHaRT), University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.Centre for Healthcare Randomised Trials (CHaRT), University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.Northern Institute for Cancer Research, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.Northern Institute for Cancer Research, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.Department of Urology, Western General Hospital, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK.Department of Urology, South Tees Hospitals NHS Trust, Middlesbrough, UK.Department of Urology, Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital NHS Trust, Exeter, UK.Academic Urology Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.Department of Urology, Basingstoke and North Hampshire NHS Foundation Trust, Basingstoke, UK.University College London Cancer Institute, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.Department of Urology, Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust, Liverpool, UK.Department of Urology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, NHS Grampian, Aberdeen, UK.Northern Institute for Cancer Research, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.Centre for Healthcare Randomised Trials (CHaRT), University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.Centre for Healthcare Randomised Trials (CHaRT), University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.University College London Cancer Institute, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.Centre for Healthcare Randomised Trials (CHaRT), University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.Edinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.Northern Institute for Cancer Research, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.Northern Institute for Cancer Research, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.University College London Cancer Institute, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.Tyne and Wear, UK.Northern Institute for Cancer Research, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.Northern Institute for Cancer Research, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.Centre for Healthcare Randomised Trials (CHaRT), University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.

Pub Type(s)

Randomized Controlled Trial
Multicenter Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Language

eng

PubMed ID

36300825

Citation

Heer, Rakesh, et al. "Photodynamic Versus White-light-guided Resection of First-diagnosis Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: PHOTO RCT." Health Technology Assessment (Winchester, England), vol. 26, no. 40, 2022, pp. 1-144.
Heer R, Lewis R, Duncan A, et al. Photodynamic versus white-light-guided resection of first-diagnosis non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: PHOTO RCT. Health Technol Assess. 2022;26(40):1-144.
Heer, R., Lewis, R., Duncan, A., Penegar, S., Vadiveloo, T., Clark, E., Yu, G., Mariappan, P., Cresswell, J., McGrath, J., N'Dow, J., Nabi, G., Mostafid, H., Kelly, J., Ramsay, C., Lazarowicz, H., Allan, A., Breckons, M., Campbell, K., ... Hall, E. (2022). Photodynamic versus white-light-guided resection of first-diagnosis non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: PHOTO RCT. Health Technology Assessment (Winchester, England), 26(40), 1-144. https://doi.org/10.3310/PLPU1526
Heer R, et al. Photodynamic Versus White-light-guided Resection of First-diagnosis Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: PHOTO RCT. Health Technol Assess. 2022;26(40):1-144. PubMed PMID: 36300825.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Photodynamic versus white-light-guided resection of first-diagnosis non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: PHOTO RCT. AU - Heer,Rakesh, AU - Lewis,Rebecca, AU - Duncan,Anne, AU - Penegar,Steven, AU - Vadiveloo,Thenmalar, AU - Clark,Emma, AU - Yu,Ge, AU - Mariappan,Paramananthan, AU - Cresswell,Joanne, AU - McGrath,John, AU - N'Dow,James, AU - Nabi,Ghulam, AU - Mostafid,Hugh, AU - Kelly,John, AU - Ramsay,Craig, AU - Lazarowicz,Henry, AU - Allan,Angela, AU - Breckons,Matthew, AU - Campbell,Karen, AU - Campbell,Louise, AU - Feber,Andy, AU - McDonald,Alison, AU - Norrie,John, AU - Orozco-Leal,Giovany, AU - Rice,Stephen, AU - Tandogdu,Zafer, AU - Taylor,Ernest, AU - Wilson,Laura, AU - Vale,Luke, AU - MacLennan,Graeme, AU - Hall,Emma, PY - 2022/10/27/entrez PY - 2022/10/28/pubmed PY - 2022/10/29/medline KW - BLADDER CANCER KW - NON-MUSCLE-INVASIVE BLADDER CANCER KW - PHASE III: TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION KW - PHOTODYNAMIC DETECTION KW - RANDOMISED TRIAL KW - SURGERY KW - TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION OF BLADDER TUMOUR KW - URINARY BLADDER NEOPLASMS SP - 1 EP - 144 JF - Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) JO - Health Technol Assess VL - 26 IS - 40 N2 - BACKGROUND: Around 7500 people are diagnosed with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer in the UK annually. Recurrence following transurethral resection of bladder tumour is common, and the intensive monitoring schedule required after initial treatment has associated costs for patients and the NHS. In photodynamic diagnosis, before transurethral resection of bladder tumour, a photosensitiser that is preferentially absorbed by tumour cells is instilled intravesically. Transurethral resection of bladder tumour is then conducted under blue light, causing the photosensitiser to fluoresce. Photodynamic diagnosis-guided transurethral resection of bladder tumour offers better diagnostic accuracy than standard white-light-guided transurethral resection of bladder tumour, potentially reducing the chance of subsequent recurrence. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to assess the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of photodynamic diagnosis-guided transurethral resection of bladder tumour. DESIGN: This was a multicentre, pragmatic, open-label, parallel-group, non-masked, superiority randomised controlled trial. Allocation was by remote web-based service, using a 1 : 1 ratio and a minimisation algorithm balanced by centre and sex. SETTING: The setting was 22 NHS hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: Patients aged ≥ 16 years with a suspected first diagnosis of high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer, no contraindications to photodynamic diagnosis and written informed consent were eligible. INTERVENTIONS: Photodynamic diagnosis-guided transurethral resection of bladder tumour and standard white-light cystoscopy transurethral resection of bladder tumour. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary clinical outcome measure was the time to recurrence from the date of randomisation to the date of pathologically proven first recurrence (or intercurrent bladder cancer death). The primary health economic outcome was the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year gained at 3 years. RESULTS: We enrolled 538 participants from 22 UK hospitals between 11 November 2014 and 6 February 2018. Of these, 269 were allocated to photodynamic diagnosis and 269 were allocated to white light. A total of 112 participants were excluded from the analysis because of ineligibility (n = 5), lack of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer diagnosis following transurethral resection of bladder tumour (n = 89) or early cystectomy (n = 18). In total, 209 photodynamic diagnosis and 217 white-light participants were included in the clinical end-point analysis population. All randomised participants were included in the cost-effectiveness analysis. Over a median follow-up period of 21 months for the photodynamic diagnosis group and 22 months for the white-light group, there were 86 recurrences (3-year recurrence-free survival rate 57.8%, 95% confidence interval 50.7% to 64.2%) in the photodynamic diagnosis group and 84 recurrences (3-year recurrence-free survival rate 61.6%, 95% confidence interval 54.7% to 67.8%) in the white-light group (hazard ratio 0.94, 95% confidence interval 0.69 to 1.28; p = 0.70). Adverse event frequency was low and similar in both groups [12 (5.7%) in the photodynamic diagnosis group vs. 12 (5.5%) in the white-light group]. At 3 years, the total cost was £12,881 for photodynamic diagnosis-guided transurethral resection of bladder tumour and £12,005 for white light. There was no evidence of differences in the use of health services or total cost at 3 years. At 3 years, the quality-adjusted life-years gain was 2.094 in the photodynamic diagnosis transurethral resection of bladder tumour group and 2.087 in the white light group. The probability that photodynamic diagnosis-guided transurethral resection of bladder tumour was cost-effective was never > 30% over the range of society's cost-effectiveness thresholds. LIMITATIONS: Fewer patients than anticipated were correctly diagnosed with intermediate- to high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer before transurethral resection of bladder tumour and the ratio of intermediate- to high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer was higher than expected, reducing the number of observed recurrences and the statistical power. CONCLUSIONS: Photodynamic diagnosis-guided transurethral resection of bladder tumour did not reduce recurrences, nor was it likely to be cost-effective compared with white light at 3 years. Photodynamic diagnosis-guided transurethral resection of bladder tumour is not supported in the management of primary intermediate- to high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. FUTURE WORK: Further work should include the modelling of appropriate surveillance schedules and exploring predictive and prognostic biomarkers. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial is registered as ISRCTN84013636. FUNDING: This project was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research ( NIHR ) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 26, No. 40. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information. SN - 2046-4924 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/36300825/Photodynamic_versus_white_light_guided_resection_of_first_diagnosis_non_muscle_invasive_bladder_cancer:_PHOTO_RCT_ DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -