[Have new noninvasive study methods replaced invasive venous pressure measurement in dermatophlebology?].
Hautarzt. 1987 Jul; 38(7):385-7.H

Abstract

Preliminary answers are given to the question as to whether or not new, non-invasive methods, such as light reflection rheography or infrared-photoplethysmography, have replaced invasive venous pressure measurements (peripheral phlebodynamometry). The results of a recent study by the author are compared with opinions found in the literature. A detailed statistical analysis has confirmed the close relationship between phlebodynamometry and indirectly observed parameters. However, it has been shown that the prediction error can be important for the diagnosis and for the prognosis as to whether or not a chronic venous insufficiency can be improved by epifascial venous therapy. Therefore it may be advisable to confirm the results obtained with non-invasive methods by phlebodynamometry in complicated cases. Both non-invasive methods are certainly very useful for quick screening of the venous function.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Blank AA

Dermatologische Klinik, Universitätsspital Zürich.

MeSH

Blood Pressure DeterminationHumansRheologyVenous InsufficiencyVenous Pressure

Pub Type(s)

English Abstract

Journal Article

Language

ger

PubMed ID

3654208

Citation

Blank, A A.. "[Have New Noninvasive Study Methods Replaced Invasive Venous Pressure Measurement in Dermatophlebology?]." Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift Fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, Und Verwandte Gebiete, vol. 38, no. 7, 1987, pp. 385-7.

Blank AA. [Have new noninvasive study methods replaced invasive venous pressure measurement in dermatophlebology?]. Hautarzt. 1987;38(7):385-7.

Blank, A. A. (1987). [Have new noninvasive study methods replaced invasive venous pressure measurement in dermatophlebology?]. Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift Fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, Und Verwandte Gebiete, 38(7), 385-7.

Blank AA. [Have New Noninvasive Study Methods Replaced Invasive Venous Pressure Measurement in Dermatophlebology?]. Hautarzt. 1987;38(7):385-7. PubMed PMID: 3654208.

* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case

TY - JOUR T1 - [Have new noninvasive study methods replaced invasive venous pressure measurement in dermatophlebology?]. A1 - Blank,A A, PY - 1987/7/1/pubmed PY - 1987/7/1/medline PY - 1987/7/1/entrez SP - 385 EP - 7 JF - Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete JO - Hautarzt VL - 38 IS - 7 N2 - Preliminary answers are given to the question as to whether or not new, non-invasive methods, such as light reflection rheography or infrared-photoplethysmography, have replaced invasive venous pressure measurements (peripheral phlebodynamometry). The results of a recent study by the author are compared with opinions found in the literature. A detailed statistical analysis has confirmed the close relationship between phlebodynamometry and indirectly observed parameters. However, it has been shown that the prediction error can be important for the diagnosis and for the prognosis as to whether or not a chronic venous insufficiency can be improved by epifascial venous therapy. Therefore it may be advisable to confirm the results obtained with non-invasive methods by phlebodynamometry in complicated cases. Both non-invasive methods are certainly very useful for quick screening of the venous function. SN - 0017-8470 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/3654208/[Have_new_noninvasive_study_methods_replaced_invasive_venous_pressure_measurement_in_dermatophlebology]_ DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -

Tags

[Have new noninvasive study methods replaced invasive venous pressure measurement in dermatophlebology?].Hautarzt. 1987 Jul; 38(7):385-7.H